One: about the signing

Applying for a VIP sign-contract, like applying for Sanjiang recommendation, is also applied in the special channel in the author's area. However,It's completely different from Sanjiang's standards,Signing-contract standards are completely based on the commerciality that Sanjiang values the least,As long as the work has a high popularity potential,Then even if the text is poor,Even if there are more typos or something,Or a little **rubbing,It won't affect the VIP application,And Sanjiang basically won't consider the martial arts homo theme,There is also the possibility of applying for VIP success。

As for what kind of books have commercial potential, and what kind of books are easier to sign and succeed, this is actually the content of the royal road above. I won't say much here.

In addition to the quality of the work itself, if you apply for a VIP sign-contract, I think the number of words of about 100,000 is the most suitable, but the specific number of words depends on the content of the work.

Compared with the Sanjiang application, there is no need to consider the time problem when applying for VIP, from Monday to Sunday, you can apply on any day, and the editor-editor will review it in the same way.

In addition, I would like to remind you of two points, both of which have been mentioned above, and which I would like to emphasize again. First, the failure of applying for Sanjiang's recommendation and the low data of the work will not affect the success rate of applying for the contract, Sanjiang does not represent commerciality, and in the absence of recommendation, it is completely normal for the work to be less popular, and the editor-editor judges the commercial potential of the work, rather than the current performance. Second, after the application for signing a contract fails, it is best to reapply after a while, if you apply once a day, then it will only cause the editor's disgust, after all, the changes that can be made in one day are very limited, and it is difficult for anyone to believe that the work can be changed in one day.

Two: What to do on the street

This is something that all authors are unwilling to face, but it is a situation that must be taken into account by anyone, especially for newcomers. What should I do if the work is on the street? Do you insist on writing it, or do you go straight to the eunuch?

In my view, neither approach is advisable. We want to write things that can make money, and we don't want to write books in vain, so if you are sure that the work is no longer effective, you still have to keep writing it, which is certainly admirable, but it is not a very wise behavior. Some open-minded authors will say, I just think it's a practice pen. It's good to think so, but I think that even if you're a newcomer, you can combine practicing and making money, at least to try, and if you can earn some income while practicing writing, it's obviously more ideal.

Compared with insisting on writing it down, direct eunuchs are the other extreme. From the perspective of short-term interests, I think this is not a way, as the starting point editor-editor, to encourage the author eunuch, this is a very ridiculous thing, but from a private point of view, I don't think this is completely impossible to consider, after all, as long as it is not a work on the shelves, the starting point is not so strictly supervised.

However, from the perspective of long-term development, eunuchs are also unwise, because this will leave a bad impression on the reader and reduce the reader's confidence in the author's next work, and second, it is more or less a "stain", and the editor-editor will use it as a reference basis for applying for a contract or something else in the future.

Therefore, I think the most reasonable thing to do is to finish it in time. If the work is sure that there is no future, then you can consider the ending, cut the plot you thought about before, cut it as much as you can, and even arrange some accidents directly for the protagonist, for example, let him get an adventure, suddenly have an epiphany, or suddenly increase his strength, so he flew to the fairy world and never returned to the world. This kind of anticlimactic ending will cause a backlash from some readers, but after all, it is better than a eunuch.

In addition, some authors will attach great importance to their debut novels, and they don't want to end here, and they want to come back one day to revise and update, so that they can add a suspension announcement at the end of the work, indicating that the work is going to be overhauled, and there will be no updates for the time being, please understand. It is better to have an explanation in this way than to be a eunuch without saying anything. Of course, it would be best if the author could write the ending first and let the work come to an end, even if he wanted to go back and rewrite it later. The whole text is not precluded from being amended.

What I said above is the treatment of the works of the servant street. Here I would like to add that the author's judgment on the service street must be very cautious, whether the work is good or bad, it is his own hard work, and do not easily draw conclusions and let it become a waste product. I would like to emphasize here that there are two situations that cannot be used as a basis for the work to serve the street.

First, the popularity was dismal in the early days of uploading. Now there are more than 10,000 works at the starting point.,Among them, it's a huge number that is being updated.,In this case,The updated chapters can only stay on the front page for a while.,It will be brushed down.,And the list of updated works on the home page,In fact, it's not the focus of readers' attention.,Therefore,In the case of no recommendation for the work.,In the absence of advertising,No matter how low the popularity,It can't explain anything.。 Only after the work has been strongly advertised, or has been recommended, and the final score is much lower than the average level, then the service street can be determined.

The second is that the application recommended by Sanjiang Pavilion is rejected. Regarding Sanjiang, I will explain below, here is to emphasize that the Sanjiang list is not a commercial list, and being reviewed by Sanjiang does not mean that the work can be popular, but it is rejected by Sanjiang, nor does it mean that the work is on the street. This is a misunderstanding that newcomers should avoid.

How to apply for a Sanjiangkaku recommendation

Here, I would like to make it clear that I am not in charge of the compilation of Sanjiang, and what I say here is only my personal opinion and does not represent the official opinion.

Often, the writer of the contract comes to me and tells me to arrange a Sanjiang recommendation for me next week. When encountering this kind of request, I always reply directly with two words, no. It's not that I don't want to help the author, in fact, many of the authors I rejected are key authors that I value very much, and I will fight for every possible recommendation opportunity for him, but Sanjiang recommends it, not among them.

Sanjiang Pavilion recommendation is independently reviewed and operated by Sanjiang editors, and no other editors have the right to interfere in any form with it, even if it is only outside of work, it is absolutely not allowed to recommend some works to relevant editors. Therefore, no matter who wants Sanjiang to recommend, you have to go to the author area to apply, even if I wrote a book by myself, if you want to recommend it, you have to go to the author area to apply according to the procedure.

The author's resentment against Sanjiang Pavilion has never been interrupted since the beginning to the present, saying that Sanjiang is incompetent, saying that Sanjiang recommends black-box operations, or all kinds of strange remarks, all of which have a certain market. What I want to say here is that Sanjiang recommendation is not the author's welfare, for non-contracted authors, the author provides the work as a starting point to increase traffic, and the starting point provides a stage for the author to play, which is the cooperative relationship between the two parties, among them, the author must pay hard work, the starting point also has to invest money in hardware facilities such as servers, as well as to invest manpower in the maintenance and operation of the website, the starting point is not obliged to recommend publicity to non-contracted authors, and even, even if it is a signed author, the starting point is only to ensure publicity, not to be sure that he can be recommended to Sanjiang。

Some people say that Sanjiang recommendation is a black-box operation, in fact, to a certain extent, it is true, because Sanjiang recommendation is a personalized list, it is a list that reflects personal taste. As I said above, Sanjiang's recommendation is not what the author deserves, it is just an opportunity for new books to be selected from the starting point, and it is naturally a good thing to be selected, but not to be selected, and there is no need to complain.

One of the main principles of Sanjiang's recommendation is to take care of new books, so all works with a certain number before a certain number are not allowed to apply for Sanjiang, and this number will increase with the number of works at the starting point. Despite this, there are still many authors who believe that Sanjiang is bullying newcomers, because many of the selected works are new books by old authors, and almost all the works of those big-name authors can be on the list, which is also an important basis for the author's attack on the starting point of the black-box operation.

In fact, it is not without reason that old authors are easy to apply successfully. In general, they are more familiar with the rules of the starting point, and they know how to operate and how to cater to them, so that they are naturally more likely to succeed. So, how can I make it easier to apply?

First of all, Sanjiang's recommended standard is to take sex as the core, and the quality of the text comes first. Therefore, if it is a work that is simple YY stream and improves speed by reducing the quality of the text, you generally do not want to consider applying for Sanjiang. Because of this, there is a small link, if done well, it will help improve the success rate of the application, that is, try to make the page tidy, make the work look more formal, reduce the typo rate, reduce oral language, Internet language, reasonable segmentation, reasonable use of punctuation, all of the above are small problems, but if you pay attention, then it will be of great help to the success rate of the application.

Secondly, the subject matter is also an important criterion for Sanjiang review, in fact, this point is more important than the text, not that some themes are easy to apply for, but on the contrary, if certain themes are involved, the application will not be successful. Here,Mainly works with political problems and ** problems,This part of the works,The general situation is not very serious,It has not yet reached the standard of refusal to enter the library,But obviously,Sanjiang's standards will be stricter,If it's ** works,Especially works with ** as the main line,And works whose titles are obviously ambiguously suggested,Sanjiang will not pass。 In addition, the works of the same human beings are basically ignored by Sanjiang's recommendation. Thirdly, it will be slightly more difficult to apply for online games.

In addition to the text and subject matter, it is a little secondary, but it is still important to be creative in the work. Generally speaking, works that seem to be relatively new are more likely to pass the review, and if they are written about old-fashioned themes and won by skill, under the same circumstances, they will be cut.

Finally, and most importantly, the commerciality of the work. Compared with the above points, this is a relatively minor factor, and it is only under the same conditions that commerciality will be considered, that is, more popular works will be recommended first.

The above points are the problems of the work itself. Outside of the work, there are still some things to pay attention to.

First of all, it is the time to apply for a recommendation. According to Sanjiang's regulations, the text must exceed 10,000 words when applying for recommendation, and if it is too late, it will not get the opportunity to apply if it exceeds the book number standard. Therefore, in general, when the number of words in the work is between 10,000 and 150,000, the application is more appropriate, and if the scope is narrowed down, then it is the easiest to apply when the number of words is roughly **10,000 words.

In addition to the number of words, the time of application is also particular, because in the second half of every week, especially on Thursday and Friday, the starting point of various lists has been set, and Sanjiang recommendation is naturally no exception. Therefore, to improve the success rate of the application, it is best to apply in the first half of the week, that is, Monday and Tuesday.

In addition, when applying for Sanjiang recommendation, you must fill in the title of the work, especially your own contact information, to facilitate the editor-editor contact, otherwise, the editor-editor will not find anyone, and you will suffer the loss.

Finally, if the application is unsuccessful, don't be discouraged, after all, Sanjiang does not represent commercial, and if the application fails, you can apply for another contract, or you can apply for Sanjiang again after a while. It should be noted here that it is best not to apply repeatedly in a short period of time, because the review of applications is the same editor, and if you apply repeatedly, you will only be rejected again and again, and even let the editor-editor remember the book, which will be more difficult to be approved in the future.

Three: explicit depictions

Here, I don't want to preach as an editor, like a child, telling everyone that the ** description is not good, and that it is not good to write this kind of thing, so everyone should not write. In fact, a lot of the time ** depiction can have a positive effect, and I don't want to deny that.

Descriptive, I think it's a double-edged sword, it has a positive meaning, but it also has a negative effect. In this regard, I actually mentioned above that adding this kind of description will obviously help the popularity of the work, especially in the early stage of the work, which is very good for the work to hit the list, but at the same time, it also restricts the further development of the work and restricts the work from getting more and better recommendations. I think it depends on the type and characteristics of the work.

If the work itself has a strong attraction and already has enough selling points, then, I think it would be wise to strictly control the ** description, because such a work does not need to rely on this kind of side-door to attract popularity, after removing the relevant description, the work still maintains a strong enough vitality, and at the same time, it will also become the official key recommendation object, so that the benefits are endless.

And if the content of the work is ordinary, lacks enough selling points, or the signs of the street are already very obvious, at this time, it is also worth considering adding ** description to save the scene, after all, at this time, it is no longer a problem of long-term development, but an imminent need for survival. Of course, we must grasp the problem of this degree here, and it must definitely be controlled within a range and cannot be exceeded. This must be noted, once the ** is exceeded, once there is a criminal record, the editor will strictly control the author's work from now on, and in the future, with the same degree of description, he will be more likely to violate the ban than other authors, and in this way, it is obviously worth the loss.

Four: Update skills

In general, there is no essential difference between the update of the VIP chapter and the public chapter, only slightly different in a few places.

The main point is that the number of words in a single chapter does not have to be based on 2,000. For works on the shelves, under the premise of stability, the number of words updated is what readers care about, not the specific number of updates. So, if a chapter is five or six thousand words, there is no need to take them apart and send them together. As for how many words are most appropriate for a chapter, I think the first thing to consider is to look at the content, to divide the plot of the paragraphs reasonably, and to stop at the key points in each chapter, that is the first thing to consider. And without affecting the content, four or five thousand words in a chapter is more appropriate, and if there are more, the starting point of subscribing to a single chapter will appear to be more, which will make readers spend heartache, and if it is controlled below 10 starting coins, they will feel much better, in addition, the number of words in a single chapter is too small and not good, if it is too little, readers will have more trouble reading it, and it is difficult to enjoy reading, and the more chapters are divided, the greater the possibility of a fractional number of words, which is easy to cause the loss of words.

In addition, the big difference between the VIP chapter and the public chapter is that the VIP chapter is difficult to modify, especially the title error, the author himself cannot change it, and the error of the text is also troublesome, the modified word count must be more than the previous one, and even if it is corrected, it will affect the reading of readers who have subscribed before. Therefore, you must be cautious when uploading VIP chapters and confirm that they are correct before starting to upload.

If you find that there is a mistake in the chapter after uploading, then you can not publish it, and directly lift the ban, which is equivalent to deleting the chapter, and you can re-transmit it, and if it has been published, then you must modify it in time, or solve the wrong chapter in time, and set the new chapter to be free and publish it.

To set up a free chapter, the correct way is to upload the chapter first, but don't publish it, and then contact your editor-in-charge and ask them to modify it to be free, and then publish it. In addition, there is another trick to set up a free chapter, that is, to determine the correct title first, and then enter a character as the text casually, upload it, because the number of body text is less than 1,000 at this time, so the system is directly set as free, at this time, you can use the modification function to modify the correct text, and then publish.

As for the lifting of the ban on VIP works, in addition to the regulations, the number of VIP words is less than 60,000 and the ban is not allowed to be lifted when it is on the shelves for less than two weeks, other can be based on the actual situation of the author, for example, if the update speed is fast, the ban can be lifted slightly faster, and if the update speed is slow, the ban can be lifted quickly, in addition, if the work is in some particularly important recommended positions, it can be appropriately lifted more, especially when the update of the public version is expected to hit the weekly list, it is still beneficial to lift the ban more. Also, when the subscription of the work is about to break through a certain level, you can also pause the lifting of the ban for a while, and then resume the public's update after the subscription has passed.

The last point to mention is VIP deposit. Some authors think that there is no need to save the manuscript after it is put on the shelf, and it is still more dangerous to write as much as you want, once the author has any accidents, such as illness, busy work, friends visiting, computer damage, etc., if the update is suspended for a while, it will cause a very bad impact, and it will be directly reflected in the subscription. It is very difficult to recover the subscription that has declined in this situation, even if it is very difficult to guarantee recommendations and updates later. In addition, if you have the opportunity to make a big recommendation such as a seal push in the future, you can take the opportunity to update more manuscripts and make the most of the recommendation opportunities, which is very advantageous. Therefore, it is best to keep some manuscripts for the VIP part as well. Of course, whether it is the public or the VIP's deposit, you must pay attention to the backup to avoid unnecessary losses.

Five: If you make friends with big-name writers

In the above advertisement, I mentioned that it is more advantageous to exchange advertisements with popular works. It's just that behind the popular works, there are popular authors, and big names are often understood as being high, putting on a show, and playing tempers, so is it possible to get their advertisements?

In my opinion, this is somewhat difficult, but not completely impossible. In fact, most of the authors of the starting point are very kind, even those platinum authors, they will not put on any shows, and they are polite to people. Of course, these authors are often very busy, and most of them rarely spend time chatting, and if you don't know them, just get a Q number, and then rush to add them and beg them for advertising, which is very unwise and impolite.

To make friends with those authors, the best way is to wait in the author group, although big-name authors generally rarely appear in the group, but occasionally they will come out to breathe, relax, if you want to wait for a certain author, then it may be difficult, but if you just want to find a high subscription author, it is not difficult. After those authors come up, you can chat with them in the group, get acquainted, and after a few times, when they have a little impression of you, then ask for an advertisement, then some authors will agree.

In addition, there is a better way to reach out directly to those authors, and that is to become a fan of their books. Whether you're really obsessed with his books or hypocritical, in short, be sure to read the author's work carefully. In fact, the main purpose of my suggestion here is not to let newcomers please the old authors, but I think that for newcomers, the works of those popular authors are indeed very worthy of study, and it is beneficial to read their works carefully.

After reading the work, you will have some thoughts, whether you think the best place to write, whether you like the characters in the book, or feel that there are any shortcomings in the book, you can mention it to the author, of course, remember to be tactful when making criticisms. The general principle is that if it is of a praising nature, it is better to put it forward publicly, such as posting on a forum or speaking in a group, and if it is a critical nature, it is better to communicate privately. Either way, the author is very welcome, and for them it is natural to be happy to receive real praise, and the advice of loyal readers is also valuable, and they are very much in need of the help of some readers who can give real opinions.

However, I would also like to remind you here that the so-called things gather like and people are grouped, and if there is too much difference in strength or popularity among the authors, it is difficult to become real friends, and it is difficult to really integrate into each other's small circles. Therefore, for newcomers who have just entered the industry, it is completely feasible to directly find the author of the biggest name to advertise, but it is limited to this kind of small help, if you want to really make friends with them, and even integrate into the circle of high-end authors, you have to rely on your own efforts, step by step development, so that you have enough capital.

In addition, if you want popular authors to help advertise, you must first ensure that they are pleasing to the eye, and first of all, you must clean the façade of the work according to what I said in the packaging section above, such as the introduction of the work, and don't look too childish. At the very least, when the authors come over and take a look, they feel generally comfortable, and they don't think it will disgrace them.

Six: Treat book reviews correctly

When you write a book, it is naturally meant to be read by others, and when there are more people who read it, there will naturally be those who like it and those who don't like it, so all kinds of comments will follow.

For many authors, it is very contradictory to deal with readers' book reviews, some of which make people flutter, only to find out that they are panacea and rejoice, some of which are genuine compliments that make people feel comfortable but are easy to get lost, some criticisms hit the nail on the head but make people have high blood pressure, and some comments are really uncomfortable to look at, but their deletion will cause a bigger backlash......

Dealing with readers' book reviews is first and foremost a question of whether to read or not. In my opinion, this is mainly based on the psychological capacity of the author. If you are psychologically fragile, you will be sad when you see all kinds of criticism or abuse, and even be made unable to write a book or eat, then simply don't read any comments, and every time you log in to the author's area and update a new chapter, you will close it directly, out of sight and out of mind. And if you have a strong psychological tolerance, then I think reading book reviews is still very beneficial, although there are also many fake flattery and malicious troubles in book reviews, but there is no shortage of really valuable comments, although the author has the most say in the work, but readers can often from different angles, If you can carefully analyze the readers' comments, find your own shortcomings and strengths, and learn from the lessons, it will be very beneficial, and it will be very beneficial to improve the level of writing. If you don't read the message, it's a pity.

What should we do if we have a poor psychological capacity, but we don't want to let go of this opportunity to improve, and we don't want the hard work of loyal readers to go to waste? I think the more feasible way is to find a trusted friend to manage the book review area, let him handle all kinds of book reviews, and select really constructive opinions among them, sort them out, and then pass them on to the author. In this way, the author can avoid being depressed when he sees some excessive messages, and can get all kinds of effective reader feedback. Of course, this friend must be trustworthy.

In fact, I don't think it's necessary to be overly angry at readers' criticism. In general, their criticism will be as follows.

The first is well-intentioned criticism, which is the improvement opinions put forward by some book lovers on the work, and for the author, this kind of criticism is actually difficult to change, which not only reflects the value of the work, can make a book lover care so much, but also an important evidence for the author to effectively improve the level of writing and improve the quality of the book. Readers who can write this kind of book review are lovely, and we have no reason to hate them.

The second is blind criticism. For example, some readers follow others blindly without reading the book carefully. This kind of comment is indeed a bit infuriating, but on second thought, we don't need it at all, because for these readers, they haven't really read the work seriously, so their criticism can only be regarded as fart, so why bother too much?

The third is the harassment of boring people and the malicious troublemaking of people with ulterior motives. These book reviews are often dominated by unreasonable abuse, and they are generally empty in content and vulgar in language. It's normal for us to be annoyed about these, but there's no need to be too angry about it, as long as we think about it, those who come to make trouble actually increase the clicks of the work and increase the popularity of the work, then, our psychology will be much more balanced. Moreover, if you can attract some people to make trouble, then understand it from another angle, it also reflects the value of the work, indicating that your work is strong enough to block someone's wealth, or the popularity is so high that it makes them blush. If you can think like that, then I believe you will not be so angry.

Of course, if you don't get angry, you don't get angry, and these malicious comments still need to be dealt with, because if left unchecked, they may drive public opinion and cause an unfavorable situation. However, we must be cautious in dealing with this kind of criticism, mainly to distinguish the dissatisfaction expressed by ordinary readers after reading it from the remarks of malicious troublemakers. If it is the former, then the comment can be deleted as it is, but it is best to communicate with the reader, use the text message on the site, etc., explain his thinking, and thank him for his suggestion;

Finally, I would like to add. Authors should have their own opinions, don't be too easily swayed by other people's remarks, and don't deny their own works because of the comments of some readers, after all, no matter who they are, what they write cannot be perfect, and it is impossible for everyone to praise them. Therefore, before accepting the advice of others and starting to modify the work, it is best to be cautious and think more about it yourself, and many times, it may not be a good thing to listen to others to revise it.

Seven: How many manuscripts are left

I don't think there is a definite number for this question, because different situations, different periods, different writing speeds, and the amount of manuscript required is different.

First of all, for the development of a single work, the more manuscripts are saved, the better, if there are a large number of manuscripts in hand, then for all kinds of lists, for canvassing, and to deal with various emergencies, it is very helpful, however, for newcomers, there is a very serious problem, that is, whether the book written is a hit, will it be useless to write all the books?

This is a very headache problem, the deposit of manuscripts is less, it is very detrimental to the development of new books, and the accumulation of manuscripts day by day, but it is also a great adventure, in case the work is on the street, then writing for so many days, is not all useless work? I think, for newcomers, first of all, they should find a way to judge whether their work is a blockbuster, if it is really impossible to judge, then you can only save a little manuscript, after all, it is not easy to write a book, and the things that have worked hard for many days become waste overnight, this blow is quite big.

There are three main ways to determine whether a work is a hit. The best way is to find an editor after writing a beginning, and show the editor the beginning and his own creative ideas, so that he can judge whether the work has a future. As to how the editors can be contacted, this will be mentioned below.

The second option is to find a friend and ask them to read the beginning of the work and listen to their opinions. After all, these people are also part of the reader, and their opinions are more or less representative of the thoughts of a part of the reader. However, this method may not be accurate, especially when friends know whose work it is, there will be subtle changes in psychology that affect their judgment. So, if you show it to a friend, the opinion can only be used as a reference, and besides, try not to let them know whose work it is beforehand.

The third way is to really improve your vision, combine the YY points I mentioned above, and combine your own feelings about popular works, and compare and contrast them, so as to judge the level of your works. Of course, this approach is more likely to be biased, and it is best not to use it as the main basis for judgment.

It is best to use these three methods in combination to comprehensively judge the future of the work. After that, if you are very confident in your work, then you can save more manuscripts, and if most people say that it is not good-looking, then you should upload it as soon as possible and see how readers react first.

The above is the impact of author's confidence on the amount of manuscripts, in addition, the speed of writing is also an important basis for determining the amount of manuscripts to be saved. If you write fast, then you can naturally save less manuscripts, if you can ensure both speed and stable writing, then you can even save manuscripts without saving, of course, if there are some, it is still good.

In a sense, manuscript storage is actually a kind of adjustment and supplement to the speed of writing. I often hear some authors complain, saying that the starting point is the world of fast gunners, and the reason why their works can't heat up is because of the lack of speed. I see this kind of remarks, all laugh it off, in fact, what really affects the popularity of the work, is the quality of the work itself, the speed of writing, and the amount of manuscripts I am talking about here, are just an auxiliary thing, and do not occupy a major position. Moreover, after there is a deposit of manuscripts, speed should not be an excuse, even if you write slowly, how many more manuscripts can be saved? Wait until you finish writing and then send it, not how much speed and how much speed you want? Even if your lack of popularity is due to the problem of speed, then you can only blame yourself for your own improper business strategy.

Next, I will talk about the number of manuscripts that need to be deposited at each stage. Note that the number I'm mentioning now is based on the premise that the writing speed is extremely slow, and it doesn't add the author's new writing, which can be reduced if you write fast enough.

After the new book is put into the library, you must first have a manuscript of 30,000 words, and try to make your work enter the editorial background as quickly as possible, and be reviewed by the editor as soon as possible. Then, when rushing the list, the total number of words should be more than 50,000, so as to meet the conditions for being on the list, in addition, 10,000 words is a criterion for applying for Sanjiang recommendation, if the number of words is enough, you can apply for Sanjiang recommendation first, if you can be on, you must be able to ensure more than two changes a day, preferably three changes a day, so that a week, you need 30,000 to 40,000 words of manuscript. After that, it is the day of strong push, and on this day, it is best to do three changes a day, that is, 45,000 manuscripts. After that, it is on the shelf, in the early stage of the shelf, it is very advantageous to have a rapid update speed, one is to make up enough 60,000 words in the VIP as soon as possible, to resume the public update, and the other is to make the chapters in the VIP look less shabby, to please the reader, this part of the manuscript, two to 50,000 words, is more appropriate.

Therefore, if you want to be safe, then save 150,000 words, and if you really don't have confidence in yourself, then start uploading 50,000 words, this number is the bottom line.

Manuscript storage is most needed during the new book period, and it is also important during the following three periods. First, when there is a strong recommendation, for example, when the upper seal is pushed, it is very necessary to have some manuscripts in hand, and there are fewer updates in those two days, which is a great waste. The second is the period of travel or some planned activity, before that, it is best to have a small amount of manuscripts, and then let the editor-editor update it during the outing, at this time the update can be slowed down a little, but definitely do not stop, otherwise, it is very detrimental to the subscription. The third is that when the work is about to end, it is best to save the manuscript at this time, so that the author can write a new book while dragging the old work down, so that when the old work is finished, the new book should also have a certain number of manuscripts, and the new book can be opened directly, avoiding the time difference in the middle, which is very helpful for stabilizing readers.

ps: From Baidu resources

This book was first published from 17k, the first time to see the genuine content!

#includevirtual="/fragment/6/3236.html".qrcode{width:590px; margin:0auto; background:#fff; border:1pxsolidc; padding:15px20px; overflow:hidden;}. qrcodeimg{float:left;}. qrcodeul{margin-left:120px; font:14px/1.5"microsoftyahei"; padding-left:15px;}. qrcodeli{list-style:square; margin-bottom:5px;}

Scan the QR code to pay attention to the 17k official WeChat, and the latest chapters can also be seen on WeChat!Click on the + sign in the upper right corner of WeChat, select Add Friends, and search for the official account "wap_17k" to follow us. Reply to "Grand Prize + Your QQ Number" to participate in the event. 10 iPhone6, 10,000 QQ members are waiting for you!