When it comes to particles, photons are naturally inseparable. We know that the speed of tachyon is infinitely close to the speed of light, and it is greater than the speed of light.

Earlier when we talked about strings, we said that the speed of a string exceeds the speed of light because it has an imaginary mass, so can it also be said here that the tachyon has an imaginary mass?

In one vlogger's introduction, this is true. So, what about neutrinos? We know that we are in a slow quantum universe, so the speed of motion of all objects should be less than the speed of light.

However, neutrinos are moving faster than the speed of light. So, what's the situation? I am a math enthusiast and like to think about problems from a mathematical perspective.

There is a class of numbers in mathematics called irrational numbers. Whereas, irrational numbers are large and small, not imaginary numbers. But, again, it's limitless.

Based on this, I speculate that the velocity value of the neutrino is probably an irrational number. Superons sound special, and they are.

According to the list, almost all hyperons decay to produce π mesons. However, Σozi does not.

However, it decays to produce Λo subs. It has two decay modes, both of which can produce π mesons.

And they are all hypertons, but the magnitude is different. However, the decayed Λo continues to undergo halving decay.

But it just doesn't generate π mesons anymore. It is important to note that the decay that produces the π meson is not a halved decay.

Since it has a short half-life, the Λo seed will continue to decay. The newly generated particles then continue to decay.

In this case, even if a π meson is generated, it will be dismantled by decay. The ideological origin of Yang Zhenning's conclusion that the universe is not conserved is the mystery of the difference between the decay products of τ and θ sons, and what I want to say is why τ is the only lepton that can decay into hadrons.

From the decay products, it can be seen that all three types of decay contain τon neutrinos. Among them, there is one that produces anti-π mesons.

The reason for this is that its quality is sufficient. Since the π meson is the lightest meson, then its anti-π meson must be the lightest anti-meson.

Although the τ mass is large, it is still small compared to the meson. Therefore, only the lightest anti-mesons can be produced.

It can decay to produce electrons, and they are both negatively charged. So, is the negative charge of τ provided by electrons?

We said that all three decays produce τ neutrinos, but they are not charged. In this way, isn't it very obvious?

If you still think it's not right, then let's look at μ. The facts prove that the μ is negatively charged.

So, the question arises, how does the negative charge of the τ exist? Since the products of both decay modes are negatively charged, it is said that there is a negatively charged group with a complex structure in the yin τ.

。 We know that a proton becomes a neutron when it gets an electron, so where does a α particle enter when it gets an electron?

α particle has two protons, will the electrons combine with Proton 1 or Proton 2?

Electrons are identical particles, and so are protons. Theoretically, then, the two protons should be the same.

That is, there is no difference. However, for electrons, there is a difference. I think the electrons will bind to the protons at the edge of the α particle, rather than going through the edge to the center to find the particle to bind.

In the world of particles, there have always been many legends.