"Wu Tian, look at you, you're all drooling!"

Sun Qiang, who was in the audience, said coldly.

"Huh? I don't! ”

Wu Tian immediately touched the corners of his mouth and found that it was dry, how could there be "saliva"!

As soon as the words fell, Wu Tian reacted, understood the meaning of Sun Qiang's words, and also said coldly: "Are you jealous that Zhu Quan is more popular than you?" I'm unmarried and don't have a boyfriend, even if it's Zhu Quan's body, it won't get in your way! ”

"Hmph... Hmph..."

Sun Qiang saw that Wu Tian, who had always been introverted, was so direct to himself, so he gave up his sarcastic thoughts, and he couldn't get off the stage when he could.

And Zhu Quan, who was on the stage, began to continue to expound his position after the second defense speech of the horse team, saying: "We believe that money is not the root of all evil.

Why?

Because money cannot cover all the evils in the world.

According to anthropological research, we know that there are four main types of evil, and three of them have nothing to do with money, and the other category has already been told by the other party.

We say that faith is the extreme evil.

In 1995, a poison gas incident occurred in a subway station in Tokyo, resulting in the death of 12 people and the hospitalization of 5,500 people.

And we also see that during the Crusades, not only adults were hurt, but many innocent, unarmed women and children hid in churches, and as a result, they were also burned alive.

We see this kind of case where the most casualties and bloodshed and the most people die, isn't it in the so-called evil of the other side?

If it is in all evils, then what does it have to do with money?

Please wait a little bit and waste a little time to explain to me. ”

To be honest, the arguments of the two arguments are eloquent, and the large paragraphs of the sentences are like rainbows, and I can't help but admire after listening to them, but people's hearts vaguely feel that something is still not right.

And what is wrong with them lies in the question that Zhu Quan asked them to answer.

Zhu Quan was very witty, for fear that the other party's next three arguments would ignore his own question, so he directly named the problem and said, "I hope they will answer it."

Again, this is a deliberate waste of the other party's time.

Jiang Feng and Yu Lei both wrote down this question on the manuscript paper.

The next thing they have to do is to focus on this question while debating, and listen to whether the other party has an answer.

If there is no answer, then urge it to answer;

If you answer, then enter your own trap and continue to refute what the other person says.

"We also see the excessive catharsis of lust.

There is a case in the United States where a woman used a Western knife to cut off the roots of her husband's offspring while her husband was asleep.

Do we say that this kind of tragedy happened because of the lack of family money, or because of hatred?

And we also saw that there was an infatuated man in Malaysia, because his girlfriend got a new love, and as a result, he split his girlfriend's body into 13 pieces. Was the cause of this evil because of the hatred in his heart, the hatred in his heart, or because his girlfriend didn't give him a breakup fee?

We know that today's disloyalty, unfilial piety, unkindness, and so on are all evil.

But we saw that Wu Sangui let the Qing soldiers enter the customs, and he did it for Chen Yuanyuan, not the dollar.

And today we see even more, if you are walking on the road today and you see a dog and you kick it, you see a cat and you step on it, is it because you are violent, or is it because the cat and the dog owe you money?

So we know that today, to sum up, many evil decisions in the world do not lie in money, and money cannot lead to the emergence of evil.

Can money be the root of all evil?

If it is really the root of all evil, ask the other party to explain how the above evils are directly related to money.

Thank you. ”

Zhu Quan also gave an example, but he was more down-to-earth and easier to understand than the other party, and won more enthusiastic applause.

The four categories of evil, one of which is caused by money, are expounded by the positive side and are quite sufficient.

And the remaining three categories of evil, one is extreme beliefs, one is the excessive catharsis of lust/desire, and the other is the irrational violation of values.

Compared with the square statement, Zhu Quan's statement can be described by the four words "unpretentious", but the logical power contained under the "unpretentious" is so powerful that people can't look at it directly.

The lethality is so great that the mentality of the players of the Zhengfang Lai Ma team has undergone subtle changes.

Gu Yuebiao, the debater who was sitting in the fourth debate position of the horse team, finally realized that the scene was a little out of control, so he secretly told himself that the third debate who was about to play next to him asked him to "all, i."

In the third debate, he tried to turn the tide.

Although, in the eyes of the audience, the situation on the field is once again unclear and falls into a state of anxiety.

But among professionals, the opposite side is already extremely advantageous.

The host Cen Ying once again controlled the scene and let the three sides stand up and discuss.

The third debater of the horse team is a man with glasses, who looks extremely gentle, slightly shorter than the rest of his teammates, but this mouth is an extremely rough voice, with a sense of "fierce" contrast.

It was not the first time that anyone present had seen the horse team play, and they all knew that this three debates had such a contrasting "fierce" sound.

Therefore, before the third debate of the horse team began to speak, the audience burst out laughing.

"Ha, the fiercest three arguments are coming!"

"That's so cute, too!"

"No one would dare to beat him just by listening to this voice!"

"Now it's not just the appearance that is deceptive, but so is the voice!"

...

With the laughter of the audience, the three debates began their own discussions.

"Thank you**.

First of all, the other party's second argument told everyone that "never" indicates the meaning of everything.

You are mistaken!

The word "10,000" in "absolutely not" is an adverb, and the word "10,000" in what we call "the root of all evil" today is an adjective.

When you compare adverbs and adjectives, do you call it "putting the horse's mouth on the head of the bull"? ”

As soon as these words came out, the senior debaters in the barrage couldn't help but post a barrage of praise:

"This angle is good! Directly explained the word "10,000"! If we are entangled in the definition of "ten thousand", it is tantamount to falling into the next place, and our argument has not been kept! ”

"Is it so miserable? I thought this was the other party's understanding of Chinese! Embarrassing .jpg"

"What are you commenting on upstairs? Do you understand debate? Here, the other party is talking more chaotic! Does it matter if "10,000" is an adjective or an adverb? I asked you if the meaning is the same, you tell me that the part of speech is different, you are kidding me? ”

"Haha, I thought it was funny when I saw a comment! 1. He's running so fast! Second, he ran as fast as he could. The "fast" in the first sentence is an adjective, and the "fast" in the second sentence is an adverb, and you tell me that these two "fast" do not mean the same thing! Few people can tell right away! ”

That is, the problem is not the difference in the parts of speech of the two words "ten thousand", just point out that the "ten thousand" of "the root of all evil" discussed today is not the "ten thousand" of "absolutely unavoidable", and there is no need to talk nonsense at all. ”

"This rough voice, coupled with this fierce language, feels very imposing!"

...

The three arguments continued to answer Zhu Quan's question just now:

"The first problem that the other classmate asked us to solve today is the cult/religion, where is the problem.

But do you know that in the example you gave Akira Asahara, a hair of Akira Asahara/Akira sold to his disciples for 30,000 yen, and a cup of bath water for 50,000 yen.

Secondly, the other classmate talked about domestic violence.

Let's think about it, domestic violence is mostly a man beating a woman. What do men say when they hit women? "I've worked hard to earn money to support my family, and you still don't serve me well!"

It's still money!

Thirdly, the other classmate also talked about hatred..."

The three arguments of the positive side unhurriedly refuted Zhu Quan's words one by one, and responded to the examples of "heretical/religious terrorist incidents", "domestic violence", "revenge for killing fathers", and "disloyalty and filial piety" just cited by Zhu Quan one by one.

There is a feeling of "Lao Tzu fought with you"!

The three debates of the positive side continued to talk eloquently, quite with a kind of courage to break the cauldron and sink the boat, and the mighty attack of the whole army.

It's just that Zhu Quan cited the Sha/Lin/Poison/Gas case in the example, and as a result, the three arguments stood up and directly described the case as the deeds of Asahara/Zhanghuang collecting money through preaching, which obviously evaded the question.

There is a second counter-point, making money to support the family is equal to money is the root of all evil!

Once again, the problem of avoiding the problem is secondary, and the most important thing is that the logic of the argumentation in this round of the three debates of the horse team is so confusing.

The third rebuttal point, how did the hatred of killing the father and the hatred of taking the wife become caused by money? The hatred of taking a wife is equal to selling a wife? Killing one's father is tantamount to betraying one's father?

How is this logic demonstrated?

The three arguments of the Laima team clearly avoided all the examples put forward by the opposing side Zhu Quan in a large paragraph of arguments, and it can be said that it is really very bullish!

However, Zhu Quan and the other four people, who were the opponents, still listened to the words with grim faces, frowning and thinking about how to debate in the next step.

They did not dare to let up in the slightest.

At this time, the atmosphere of the scene reached its climax at this moment!

It can be said that the ornamental nature of the debate is great, and the uninterrupted applause at the scene is enough to explain everything.

But as the three arguments continued, the few people who were originally frowning were relieved.

Because Zhu Quan and others have found errors and omissions in his exposition, some points of view are a little suspicious of imposing logic, and they have a bit of slapping their own mouths.

Because they have already established that "ten thousand" is not "everything", they are now trying to explain that all the evils they propose are caused by money.

It's like giving people heads!

So, this is really "heaven is beautiful"!

Although the momentum on the field is now very well done by the Laima team, and it is very hot, but the undercurrent surging underneath, they seem to have ignored it.

Here's your chance!