The second debate of the old depression reduction team is a man with glasses named Cai Zhongda, who immediately got up after Jiang Ge finished speaking, and the host Cen Ying took control of the scene, and violently attacked the speech of the Hua Guo team:

“... Just now, the other student talked a lot, so let's examine them one by one whether good is the foundation or evil is the foundation?

Is good a manifestation or is evil an appearance?

Let's start with an example, if we want to eat watermelon today, do we have to plant watermelon seeds first? If we grow red beans and mung beans, will we grow watermelons? ...”

After undertaking a debate, and taking watermelon seeds as an example, it is particularly appropriate to "plant melons and get melons, plant beans and get beans".

"The second argument of this square is obviously much, much better than the previous first argument of the square!"

"I think too! I think it's hard to understand after a long day of debate, although I know that she is talking about "human nature is inherently good", but the examples she gave are indeed saying that "human nature is inherently evil". ”

"I feel like the old depression team is pulling the crotch! The example of what kind of traffic rules is simply that it directly lowers the level of the debate competition. ”

This proposition can locate the cruel rules of life survival as the "source of evil", and it can also position the sacrificial individual interests of the development of social civilization as the "source of goodness". ”

"Positive: All of the above have made sense, why don't you come to the stage and debate? It's okay for everyone to put forward their own suggestions, but don't look down on the strength of the old depression reduction players. After all, they're a lot better than most of us! ”

...

Cai Zhongda, the second debater of the old depression reduction team, continued to argue, arguing that desire itself is not evil, but also reasonable:

“... Human evil is because human beings have desires, and human beings have such an essence, so I don't understand, why does desire necessarily bring evil?

I like a girl today, and this girl likes me too, and we both want to marry each other, and we form a beautiful family, is this evil?

Besides, people have instincts, and when they are hungry, they want to eat, and that person is not the same as a lion?

How do you explain that?

In addition, let's think about it again, the other classmate said that human nature can be educated, so the evil nature can be educated to be good, let's think about it, why can human nature be educated to be good?

We say that a bird can fly, and it can fly as long as it learns to fly, so why can't we fly by ourselves, no matter how we teach it?

Because we don't have the nature to fly in our nature!

Why, then, are people taught to do good?

It's because we believe that there is goodness in human nature.

It would be strange to say that human nature is evil and can be taught to be good.

If human nature does not have goodness, why do we know what good is as soon as we learn it, and we know how to do good when we teach it, but we can't teach you how to fly?

Even if our nature is evil, then who will teach us, and who will teach us who is evil?

Why do they teach us?

What exactly are their motives, and can we trust him? ”

Hearing now, Zhu Quan and others can be regarded as reminiscing, and the feelings are transformed from "physiological instinct" into "emotional instinct", which is obviously wrong!

Cats eat fish, dogs eat meat, Ultraman fights little monsters, is it just because "fish" is an endangered species, "meat" is particularly expensive, and "little monsters" do not do bad things, can they condemn "cats", "dogs", and "little monsters" as evil?

Do they want to suppress their "physiological" instincts and "starve to death"?

Zhu Quan handed Jiang Feng a piece of A4 paper that he had written down, and only wrote one sentence on it: "The greatest evil is to be evil to yourself."

Jiang Feng glanced down, nodded at Zhu Quan, and then shook his head slightly at the second argument of the square, and sneered.

And such an action happened to be recorded by the camera lens, and Jiang Feng's "disdain" could be revealed from the screen.

"The King's Contempt!"

"A confident smile!"

"Honey smile!"

"Is this the legendary laughter without saying anything?"

"This smile is so arrogant! Crooked, 110, there are people here who don't respect their opponents, you don't care?! ”

"Police Department: Sorry, not in the service area!"

"Jiang Feng: Sister, I have already seen through everything!"

"Haha, it's a real hammer! Goddess Jiang Feng was extremely dissatisfied with the speeches of the two members of the old depression reduction team! ”

A contemptuous smile. Sister talked to you about Cao Cao and Louis XV, why did you talk to me about growing watermelons? Our debate is not in one dimension at all! ”

I smiled nobly and coldly: You know what a fart! Hehehe..."

"If I were to debate, I would be dissatisfied! How can metaphors be used in debates, which are all embellished scraps, to dominate? There is no distinction between priority and priority, and it is not convincing! ”

...

After seeing Jiang Feng's "smile that sees through everything", the audience on the barrage shook their wits and "laughed" at the defense of the second argument.

I don't know if I sensed something, but I gave an example:

"Let's say, for example, an old man falls and we pick him up;

We have made so many friends in the old depression, and we have sincere affection;

We see the hungry people in Africa, everyone has a feeling of loneliness, sorrow, and compassion for the world and the world. It's hypocrisy to make friends...

Thank you! ”

With a "beep", the time is up.

And Jiang Feng couldn't bear the power of the flood in his body, so he came up and asked a question that pointed directly to people's hearts:

"Since society is made up of people, but the other party thinks that the evil in the social environment has nothing to do with the evil of people, then I ask you:

Where does the evil in the external environment come from?

How does your good lead to evil? ”

Ruthless!

The witty words are like pearls, which not only undertakes the viewpoint of their own first debate, but also gives full play to it and attacks the empirical basis of the second argument.

"This damn aura has been suppressed again!"

"I think it's because Zhengfang always says that he wants to help the old man and help the old man, so he was suppressed!"

"Can the old man be able to help him around?"

"Square I exploded, exploded, how can this be fought? Completely crushed! ”

"I feel that Jiang Feng's tone is like saying: This is the target given to us by the Zhengfang defense friend!"

"The winner is decided!"

"Please, don't milk! After all, the old depression reduction team is not much better than the South Korean team! ”

...

Jiang Feng continued: "We have never thought that human instincts and desires are evil, and that man's unbridled expansion of his own instincts and desires is evil! Confucius told us a long time ago: "Hearsay, virtue is abandoned." ””

After emphasizing his own point of view again, Jiang Feng began to discuss his own point of view:

"First, the inherent evil of human nature is the crystallization of human rational understanding throughout the ages.

As early as 2,000 years ago, in the so-called axial age of human civilization, Xunzi's theory of sexual evil echoed the original sin theory of Judaism.

In modern times, from Machiavelli to Freud, all of them have advocated the inherently evil of human nature, is this just a historical coincidence?

No!

The great philosopher Hegel said, 'When they say that human nature is inherently good, they say a great idea, but they forget.' When they say that human nature is inherently evil, they are speaking of a great mind. ’

Regrettably, the fact that the opposing side has not yet woken up to such insight reminds me of Josie Billings' quote, 'Truth, though scarce, is always in oversupply.' ’

...”

As soon as these remarks came out, applause immediately rang out in the venue.

This is the correct use of famous sayings!

At this moment, the advantage seems to be leaning again on the side of the Chinese national team.

Finally, there is the quote of Issy Billings, "Truth is scarce, but there is always an oversupply." To be sarcastic.

Now that the high-level things have been explained, I will now talk about some of the lower riba people's arguments.

In a debate, it has to be comprehensive, and if it is not comprehensive, then it has to be qualified.

In short, don't put yourself in the range of being attacked, or likely to be attacked.

Jiang Feng continued: "Second, the evil nature of human nature is a truth that daily life has repeatedly shown us.

From King Lear's unfilial daughters to the husbands who punched their wives in the face on Lianhe Zaobao, from the UN peacekeepers who resold their plasma to the Latin American drugs/scots who killed people without blinking, the list of wicked people and evil deeds is really traversing the past and the present.

Friend of the other party, do you still want to talk about the inherent goodness of human nature against the four evildoers in "Dragon Babu", who are full of evil, do no evil, fierce and evil, and extremely vicious? ”

The audience burst into good-natured laughter.

Jiang Feng was full of firepower, continued to state his own views, and once again ridiculed the other party's false arguments:

"Third, although we acknowledge that human nature is inherently evil, it does not mean that the future of humanity is dark.

The reason why man has become the essence of the universe and the primate of all things is not because he is flawless and perfect, but because he has the courage to recognize himself and admit the inherent evil of human nature.

People have the rationality to judge right and wrong, and can promote good and abandon evil.

In order to rectify the original evil of human nature, people not only enacted laws to quell violence, regulate morality to reduce strife, and set up governments to punish rebellion, but also advocated steadfastness against indiscretion and wrote fairy tales to curse ingratitude.

It's really painstaking and exhaustive.

However, the opponent's defense friend insists that human nature is inherently good, and the implication is that all the moral education of human beings is superfluous! ”

This is yet another mockery of the strength of the old Depression Reduction Team, an attempt to nail it to the pillar of shame that negates the achievements of human education.

Jiang Feng glanced at the remaining time, paused, and said in a deep voice:

"In addition to the heartache, I can't help but ask the other side, if human nature is good, then what do we want moral, legal, and traffic rules for?

If human nature is inherently good, is there still a need for personal cultivation and social education?

Thank you! ”

"Di", the time is just right.

The applause was warm and long-lasting.