At this time, the momentum of the opposing side has risen, if the three arguments of the positive side have not made a big move, then only Yu Lei needs to push forward lightly, and the victory can be established.

There is no need for the next free debate session and Zhu Quan, who is in the fourth debate, to easily win the game.

It's just that it will be so easy to win the game?

This is a question mark!

Although there is a gap in strength between the old depression reduction team and the Huaguo team, no matter what, if this old depression reduction team can break into the finals, it still has some strength.

Otherwise, even if it's shady, it won't work!

It's not like football, you can score if you kick a goal, and if you don't score, you don't score, so you can distinguish it very well.

No matter how dirty South Korea was when the island nation co-hosted the World Cup with South Korea, it could be fooled.

After all, athletes can only vent on the court, and they can't get any public opinion at all.

Come to think of it, who still remembers the dirty inside story of South Korea?

But the debate tournament is different.

The mouth of the literati is quite powerful, and whoever offends the literati is destined to "leave a stench for 10,000 years".

Even if he has made unprecedented contributions, he is not exempt from this.

Wasn't Qin Shi Huang a victim of this?

Unification of China, "the same track of the car, the same text of the book"... and other merits, but because of the matter of "burning books and pit Confucianism", he was scolded until now.

Therefore, under normal circumstances, things between cultural people are more fair, and everyone wants to be famous in history, not notorious.

Therefore, the "insider" in the debate tournament must also have a certain strength to be able to get it.

If you debate like the old depression reduction team now, it is doomed to lose.

The reason why the "College Debating Competition" started in 1993 has been able to be held for 13 sessions, and it is becoming more and more popular, and more and more people from countries and regions are participating in the competition, on the one hand, because of its external factors, the comprehensive national strength of China has risen, the influence of China is increasing day by day, and there are more and more schools and students learning Chinese.

On the other hand, there are internal factors!

The judging of this "College Debate Competition" is very fair, just and open.

Even if the old depression team eliminated several of their opponents one after another because of "good luck", it is reasonable, after all, the two sides participating in the competition are at the level of half a catty.

This is not like an international English competition, which has a lot of insider information, and always discriminates against non-English-speaking countries and regions, including China.

Simply so!

And as the "College Debate Competition" gets better and better, its three implicit benefits are gradually revealed.

The first is "new", the international college debate tournament held in 1993 can be described as "new", and with the help of the promotion and support of the government at that time, this debate tournament has a "spread" channel, which is also "new".

After seeing such wonderful debates, foreigners, especially people from some Asian countries, have the idea of learning Chinese and put it into practice, thus expanding the influence of China.

The second is "culture", a competition for college students from internationally renowned universities, where students from prestigious universities are not just famous, but truly have cultural literacy.

Take this competition as an example, we can see that in the debate arena, science includes Darwinian evolution and Copernican heliocentrism;

The history includes the battle for the survival of the Peking people, the Auschwitz concentration camp;

Literature includes Confucius and Mencius, Xunzi;

Philosophy has Hegel, Kant;

The contestants quoted scriptures and carried out discussions, which is worth seeing.

We have to admit that there are differences between people, and the best way to reduce this difference is to read books.

If the young people of our generation do not forge ahead, how can they gain a foothold in this bustling society.

It makes the Chinese people themselves have a spirit of "studying hard and making progress every day".

The third is "skill", which we call debate skills from a debating perspective.

As the saying goes, a debate tournament is a war without gunpowder.

This is very interesting, since it is a war, there will be a "conspiracy", and debate, of course, will make a fuss about speech, to put it nicely, it is called the art of communication.

It makes the intellectually and brain-beneficial activity of debate shine, and shifts the attention of the audience, especially the young audience, from the meaningless traffic apps such as Douyin and Weibo to the books.

After the host Cen Ying took control of the scene, the three debates of the positive side began their own discussions, but when they were talking, they were a little chaotic, and people didn't know what to say.

The three arguments suddenly became a little emotional, and the speed of speech flew so fast that people couldn't hear what they were saying at all, and they felt as if they were scolding.

Moreover, his hand is pointing directly at the opposite seat.

After Zhu Quan and the others heard such a discussion, their faces suddenly changed slightly.

What is going on?

Debating this matter is not telling the truth at all!

In other words, no matter whether the point of view is correct or wrong, as long as the debate is right, it is the "truth", and it is considered a win.

The debate is mainly based on momentum and etiquette. Look at the strategy, look at the impact of what is said.

Even if it is to say that the black is white, even if it is to say the false to be true, as long as the logical self-consistency is formed, and the opponent has no way to break through the created context, it is to win the game.

Is it difficult to engage in a debate question "It is correct to play with a mobile phone in class", is it possible to hold a positive view and think that "it is correct to play with a mobile phone in class" is valid, and then the debate will not be won?

So what's the use of coming up with this debate?!

What's the point?

Obviously.

This is not the case!

If you take the right view, you will still win.

Only in this way can we ensure that the debate is fundamental to its continued viability.

It's just that this kind of debate will be difficult to play!

And now, in the debate, the positive side is powerful, after all, the banner of "political correctness" is held high, and the opponent of "factually correct" does not dare to say too much, so as not to risk being "404".

Perhaps because of this, the positive side was forced to the edge of the cliff by the Chinese team aggressively when it had an advantage, and could not take a step back, causing the three arguments of the positive side to be extremely out of shape when speaking.

But, even if so, you can't do that!

There are rules for debate.

Debate, even in attack, will be polite and relaxed, even the gesture of speaking, you must be careful not to point at others.

The so-called emotional (angry) emotions (and) agitated (defeated) (bad) high-pitched (bad) behaviors and camera-grabbing behaviors are very, quite, and extremely low beeping behaviors.

The correct way to debate is that one side concentrates its firepower, bites a question and does not let go, and bounces back the opponent's question;

On the other hand, one side is scattered/bullets/Kikura strafing, and the other party's problems cannot be contained, no matter whether they win or lose, it is clear who is holding whom.

The gaffe of the three arguments made Zhu Quan and others sure: This game of the old depression reduction team may really be lost.