In fact, the focus of this interview is how Western countries deceive ordinary people, tamper with the truth of scientific facts, and propose a virtual "carbon emission right" resource, so as to continue to exploit and plunder the development rights of developing countries.

Exposing these pickled things and informing them to all the Chinese people is the purpose of this program.

Zhu Quan, a fledgling boy, can see that naturally, Chai Jing'er, who has rich experience in interviewing and stronger business ability, naturally knows it.

It's just that, compared with Zhu Quan, who has a red heart, Chai Jing'er, the "banana man", has already knelt down in front of Western capitalism and doesn't want to understand it.

Such people still occupy a lot of people in China.

For example, those public knowledge on Weibo are typical representatives.

Regarding the issue of China's emission reduction, when Chai Jinger interviewed Academician Ding yesterday, two levels of problems were raised:

The first level is whether China needs to reduce emissions;

The second level is what plan China needs to follow to reduce emissions;

Therefore, if the answer to the first level question is no, then the second level question does not need to be answered.

But whether it is the point of view represented by Academician Ding in the video, or the point of view represented by Chai Jinger, the answer to the first question is actually yes, so the question they are facing is actually at the second level.

In the case of the Copenhagen climate conference, which the two men debated, both the IPCC and the G8 have actually set a cap on human emissions.

In this way, there is a ceiling on emissions from developing countries when given emission caps for developed countries.

And if this ceiling is followed, when the expected target is reached, the per capita carbon emissions of developed countries will be twice or more than that of developing countries.

The difference between Academician Ding and Chai Jing'er is that these distribution plans are fair?

Or, to put it more bluntly, is it acceptable?

From the perspective of economic development, developed countries have basically completed industrialization and infrastructure construction, and related high-energy consumption industries have basically been upgraded or eliminated or transferred.

In developing countries, including the BRIC countries, industrialization and infrastructure are far from perfect, and at the same time, the upgrading of industrial structure requires a considerable industrialization foundation.

Therefore, according to the emission reduction plan of the Copenhagen climate conference, it means that the pace of industrialization in developing countries will be blocked all of a sudden, and it will take longer and longer to reach the current level of development of developed countries, and may even never reach it.

Therefore, this is equivalent to putting a "rope" on the development of the country, and whenever you want to move forward, you will be "constrained", and in the end you can only watch the developed countries become stronger and stronger.

It has been said that, according to the Copenhagen proposal, developed countries will reduce their emissions more and developing countries will reduce their emissions to a lesser extent.

But for developed and developing countries, the implications of emissions reductions are quite different.

Developed countries are simply building on what they already have, while developing countries will either have to jump directly to the industrial level of developed countries, or they will have to reduce the speed of their industrialization.

For example, if a millionaire earns a million a month and a salaryman earns 10,000 a month, even if the rich man loses 90 percent of his income, he can do more than a 10 percent salaryman.

Moreover, the most, most critical thing is that the IPCC cannot even produce an accurate global carbon emission assessment report.

Note that this is an accurate carbon emission assessment report, and not all numerical estimates are 10±3 Pg/y

C's kind.

In other words, if the IPCC can come up with an accurate report to ask developing countries to give up the future in exchange for a very clear and bright future for the planet, then at least the views represented by Chai Jing'er and others still have a little moral advantage.

But now, this prospect is vague or even illusory.

Naturally, Academician Nadin, a genuine scientist who seeks legitimate interests for the developing countries and the people of the developing countries, is naturally unable to agree.

Taking a step back, even if the IPCC could produce an accurate and necessary feasibility report, it would not be able to agree.

There are always people or countries to be sacrificed, and that person or country, why should we people from developing countries?

To be more specific, what is Huaguo?

Aren't the Chinese people human?

This is also the sentence that Academician Ding questioned Chai Jing'er at the end of yesterday's interview, which made Chai Jing'er speechless.

After a series of oral broadcasts, Zhu Quan immediately introduced Academician Ding Zhongli, and then raised his first question.

It can be said that Zhu Quan maintains the fine tradition of the host of national television, that is, he does not play routines, never fools, and plays real directly.

Zhu Quan opened his mouth and asked, "Academician Ding, hello." I noticed that before you went to the Copenhagen climate conference, you published a paper that proved that there is no real causal relationship between carbon dioxide and global warming, right? ”

"Yes!"

Academician Ding nodded.

"This is different from what we know..."Zhu Quan smiled and continued: "Can you briefly tell us how you came to such a conclusion?" ”

Zhu Quan knows the reason, but as an interviewer, he must let the audience understand, let the guests play, and increase the credibility of the show.

Otherwise, what interviews are needed?

Just come to a press conference and announce it!

Academician Ding then nodded with a smile and said, "This can be easily explained very clearly. I ask you to think about it, is it that the winter of the last ten years or so has become colder and colder? ”

"That's right! It's getting colder! I remember when I was in junior high school, I didn't feel cold when I wore a thick sweater and a padded jacket on the outside, but now I wear two of them, and it's still enough to choke! ”

Zhu Quan replied empathetically.

"You see, that's a concrete manifestation of global cooling." Academician Ding spread his hands, and then continued: "The turn of the century is a warm platform, and after this warm platform has already begun to decline, so now this kind of strong cold weather is a signal of decline. ”

Zhu Quan continued to sigh: "You are making a point that surprises us very much!

Because before almost everyone thought that we are now on a global warming trend, and very dangerous upwards.

You tell us now that we're on the verge of cooling down. ”

After a pause, Zhu Quan asked the first set of questions about the truth revealed in this interview: "... If I say I don't believe it, then I'll have to dismiss the specific example you just given. So I think the conclusion you came up with is correct.

So, can "global warming" be considered a lie?

If it's a lie, then who made it up?

What is the purpose of making up the lie of "global warming"? ”

When Academician Ding Zhongli heard Zhu Quan's set of questions that went straight to the truth, he was in a trance:

What kind of host is this!

It's just too sharp!

It's so special to my heart!

No wonder the leaders of Guotv repeatedly assured him when he called him to request a revisit, and there would never be such a situation as Chai Jing'er!

I dared to find a like-minded "comrade" for myself!