There may also be a man of the same blood type involved in the case, but the police did not take the matter into account at all. No possibility can be overlooked in the investigation of the case. Therefore, it was erred to conclude that the defendant was suspected of being of blood type AB only because of his blood type.

The circumstances of the defendant are roughly as follows:

Prior to 4:35 a.m., four persons who were unknown to the defendant had witnessed the defendant walking on the path in the opposite direction to the victim's home. At about 4:50 a.m., the defendant was seen continuing in the same direction a mile further from the aforementioned location on the same trail. The man even stopped to chat for about 15 minutes at the defendant's suggestion, and at 5:25 a.m., someone saw the defendant walking in the direction of his house on the road about half a mile away. The distance from Mrs. Butler's house to the waterhole was about a quarter and a quarter of a mile.

It is presumed that the victim walked this distance for about 20 minutes, so the walk to the waterhole should have been around 4:35 a.m. The defendant was first witnessed by the four persons between 4:30 and 4:35 a.m., and the distance from the site to the waterhole was two and a half miles, so it was impossible for the defendant to be near the waterhole at 4:30. If the defendant is presumed to be the real murderer, the defendant must walk three and a quarter miles (part of which is walking side by side with the victim) after the victim leaves Mrs. Butler's house, complete the tracking, intercourse, murder, etc., within 20 minutes to 25 minutes, and place the victim's hat, shoes, bags, etc. on the river embankment. The defendant was arrested within two or three hours of the discovery of the victim's body, but emphasized his alibi, a defence that remained the case at the post-mortem, jury and interrogation stages, as well as at the public trial. The plaintiff did not adduce any rebuttal to this point and did not question the credibility of the witnesses' testimony in this defence.

Although the testimony of the witnesses in terms of the time factor was somewhat disjointed, after careful verification on the day after the incident, it was found that the testimony of these witnesses was indeed broadly consistent with the facts. In such a case, the defendant should have no grounds for conviction in accordance with the contents of the indictment. However, this incident has become a sensation and the defendant has been outraged by the world, and if the court acquits him, he will certainly be seriously attacked by public opinion. Therefore, this case is a good example of the officers who have fulfilled their mission with composure and calmness.

It can be said that there was no definite incriminating evidence on the basis of which the jury could try the guilt. It is not impossible for the victim to be tempted by the defendant to commit suicide by throwing himself into the pool after the defendant leaves; In addition, on the morning of the meeting with the defendant in the lounge, the victim had walked to the market, and that night he had been dancing wildly all night without getting a drop of water, and had trekked a long way on the vegetable garden.

After the defendant raped the victim, fearing that the latter would publicize the matter, he pushed him into the pool in order to kill people and kill him, which is just pure speculation. Judging from the fact that the victim stayed with the defendant all night and was in high spirits during his visit to Mrs. Butler's home, there can be no doubt that the intercourse was voluntary.

In addition, the dew on the blood-stained weeds did not fall, and the basis for inference is equally weak. Because no one could prove that the weeds were condensing before the blood stains were stained, on the contrary, although the defendant and the victim were indeed in the opposite direction of the grass that night, the grass did not see their footprints.

If the defendant's alibi is incomplete, the defendant and the victim have not met anyone since they parted, and the defendant and the victim were indeed together that night in the grass in opposite directions where no footprints were seen, in this case, the defendant would have been unable to be cunning, and would have been sentenced to death in the face of conclusive evidence. However, none of the above facts have anything to do with the facts of the crime, so it is a matter of course to acquit the defendant if there is insufficient evidence of the crime.

After reading it, Tian Chunda said: I am surprised that such a similar case exists. Although this is an example of a foreign country, it should not be surprising that the same human beings live on Earth, so it should not be surprising that the same situation is happening, right? Seeing this almost identical case made me even more convinced.

Tian Chunda also said: "According to the description of the previous investigation materials, the victim He Shan was brought to the scene under the rhetoric of the defendant Ren Ping, and He Shan did not know Ren Ping at all. But when a woman is accosted by a strange man, who can't be instinctively wary? What's more, the defendant was just a handyman in a small hotel, and his appearance was very ordinary. I think it's unlikely that the victim will obediently follow such a man. Moreover, I went to a sparsely populated place, and it was already dark. The victim was a woman who worked in a bar, and it was said that she did not hesitate to sell herself in order to make money, but where did the defendant have such money? ”

"So, you think He Shan went to that scene with her lover, isn't that so?" Hao Dong said.

"That should be the only possibility, right? Kasugi took the 6 o'clock bus and got off at Momijiya Station. She walked across the suspension bridge at 7 o'clock, and during this time she was waiting in front of the station for her lover to take the next bus, and then went to the scene together, right? The first-line bus runs every half hour, so her lover should take the 6:30 bus. In this way, the two of them walked over with a smile and a smile, and when they came to the suspension bridge, it should have been around 7 o'clock. ”

The walking time from the station to the suspension bridge should be 20 minutes, however, it will be slower for a couple to walk while talking. The stroll coincided with what the daughter of the charcoal shop owner said about seeing people in red walking across the suspension bridge in front of the 7 o'clock TV news.

Tian Chunda believes that he has found a breakthrough that can overturn the previous argument of Ren Ping's guilt. He continued to talk about his views on Hao Dong:

The previous investigation materials stated that the defendant's possession of the victim's silver necklace was the only physical evidence. The possession of the victim's belongings before his death in order to prove that the defendant is the real murderer is not insignificant. However, according to the defendant's confession, it was found in the corner of the clock shop in front of Momijiya Station. The necklace is extremely delicate, and women are often heard of falling off their necks without realizing it. The hook of the necklace in this exhibit is indeed loose, so it cannot be concluded that it was broken by violence. Therefore, it is not impossible that the victim walked in front of the watch shop and fell off the necklace without realizing it. In other words, the defendant's possession of the object cannot be inferred as the result of his crime.

What's more, at 10 o'clock in the evening of the 24th, the defendant once gave this thing to Tian Lian, a waitress who also worked in the "Spring and Autumn Villa". The time of the victim's death was between 6 and 8 p.m. on the 24th, and assuming that the time of the murder was between 7 and 8 p.m., would anyone give the victim's belongings to others a few hours after the murder was carried out? Putting aside what will happen after the transition for the time being, is there really such a murderer in the world who is willing to give away the object that proves his crime to others shortly after committing the crime? For fear of being searched by the police, it is natural for the killer to hide this kind of thing as much as possible. Isn't what the defendant did the counter-evidence that the silver necklace was found on the road? In addition, according to the contents of the previous investigation materials, the blood type of the semen collected from the victim's body was AB type. The defendant's blood type was AB. In this case, it is normal to assume that the defendant has violated the victim.

However, the basis for concluding that only the defendant and the victim had had sexual relations is too weak. It is not impossible for the victim to have sex with another man soon after having sexual intercourse with the defendant. If the blood type of the second man is type B, the semen and fluid of the second man can only be identified as AB because the semen and fluid are mixed with the AB type of the previous defendant in the victim's genitals. It is not uncommon for a woman to have sex with two men in a short period of time, especially if she is raped. In this case, since the defendant was determined to be the only person who had sexual intercourse, the police did not conduct such an analysis and examination at all, and it was incorrect to conclude that he was the defendant just because he saw the semen-fluid of type AB as mentioned above. There may have been a man with blood type B who had sex with a woman.