There are a lot of people who support the views of all sides.

The audience was full of thousands of people.

In addition to the teachers and students of the university, there are also many people from the community.

They were all interested in this debate topic after seeing the announcement of the debate competition posted by this well-known university on various channels, and they came to watch it one after another.

At this time, the alumni on both sides of the debate tournament are also cheering for their teams, hoping to win the debate.

After the pros and cons finished their speeches, they then came to the tense stage of attacking and debating.

The two arguments stood up and asked questions about the two arguments of the opposing side.

"Just now, the opposing view is that there is no deadline for getting married and having children."

"Then I would like to ask the opposing debater three questions."

"First, do you agree that the human body has the best time to give birth?"

"Or, if you think that people don't have to get married and have children, then when you go to the second question, what do you think of the ancestral teachings left by your ancestors: there are three unfilial pieties, and no descendants are greater?"

"The third problem is if you have the idea of getting married and having children, but you can't do it at the right age."

"When you are old, other conditions are met, and the fertility window has been closed."

"In this case, will the opposing side still stick to the original point of view?"

"Please answer the second defense of the opposing party, thank you!"

These three questions, layer by layer, can not be described as sharp.

The students in the audience who supported the opposing views all sweated for them.

"These questions are hard to answer!"

"yes, if you're not careful, you'll fall into the pit."

And the students who supported the positive point of view excitedly shouted: "Well done!" ”

In fact, the students of these colleges and universities also have their own considerations and worries about the topic of this debate.

Although their age seems to be a bit young for marriage.

However, in the current social atmosphere, basically after graduating from college, you will begin to face marriage urging in a few years.

And before getting married, they also need a certain amount of time to contact and screen the partner.

Therefore, from a practical point of view, many students subjectively believe that the sooner they consider this matter, the better.

If you think about it early, you will leave yourself plenty of time to prepare.

At this time, the second argument of the opposing side is also ready to answer.

She stood up and answered one by one.

"To answer the first question of the opposing debater, we agree that there is a best window for human reproduction."

"But we don't think it's necessary for everyone to get married and have children."

"If you don't find a suitable partner, or the pressure to survive is too great, or you just don't like it, you don't need married life, etc., in these cases, there is no need to go against your personal will and living conditions to choose someone who is not sincere to marry."

As the words fell, many of the audience applauded loudly.

Hearing this classmate completely speak their minds, they felt a long sigh of relief in their chests.

If they can successfully meet the right person in all aspects and they like, and the economic and life pressure is not so great, there is no need for them to resist marriage and refuse to have children.

What they resist is marrying and having children with someone they can't accept, or entering into marriage without the conditions.

What they are afraid of is that they have chosen the wrong person, so that they will not only ruin their present and the rest of their lives, but also fail to create a good nurturing environment for their children.

The debater continued.

"So on this premise, let me answer the second question of the square."

"That is, how to look at the ancestral teachings 'there are three unfilial pieties, and no queen is great'."

"In the case that the core needs of individuals for marriage cannot be satisfied, even if they are reluctant, they must meet their parents' wishes to get married and have children, is this the 'filial piety' that is understood by the positive side?"

"If yes, please forgive me for not agreeing."

Hearing this, many viewers nodded in satisfaction.

The debater was not led into the ditch by the other side, but jumped out of the framework set by the other side.

brought everyone into the situation she set, which can be said to be a very clever solution to the problem.

At the same time, more viewers are curious about what they have to say to really refute this fallacy.

This is also a common dilemma that everyone faces when communicating with their parents.

Many people don't agree with it in their hearts, but they can't say it even if they are stupid, and they can't say the view that their parents are morally kidnapped.

So I'm looking forward to learning from the answers of these excellent debaters in today's debate competition.

On the stage, the female debater continued in a clear and eloquent manner: "There are three unfilial pieties, and there are two others. ”

"Ah Yi is obedient, trapped in injustice, and unfilial."

"The family is poor and the elderly, not for Lu Shi, and the second is not filial."

"The first sentence means that if you do not correct your parents' wrong words and deeds, you are obedient to them, and you are trapped in the injustice of your parents, which is one of the manifestations of unfilial piety."

"Knowing that it is not the partner or time we want to get married, our parents insist on pushing us into marriage in order for us to keep offspring."

"These are wrong words and deeds, and we should correct them, not blindly follow them."

"Because we are responsible for our own lives."

"As for the second sentence, it means that the family is poor and the parents are old, if they can't mix up an official and a half-job, and receive a salary to support their parents, it is the second manifestation of unfilial piety."

"I believe that not many people will take this sentence to the modern society to discipline young people."

"Because it is neither suitable for the mainstream values of modern society, nor does it make much sense, because there is no industry that cannot make money to support parents."

"This just shows that the words of the ancients have their corresponding social environment and context at that time."

"If you copy everything, you will only appear blind and ignorant."

"To sum up, we need to look at and listen to the ancient teachings dialectically, rather than blindly following them like the Holy Decree!"

After this paragraph, the audience once again burst into warm applause.

The initial relaxation on the faces of the debaters on the front side was gone, replaced by nervous looks.

Each of them felt threatened by their opponents.

The brain is also constantly spinning, thinking about how to refute it for a while.

And off the stage, the audience who supported the opposing view was so addicted that even the supporters of the positive view had to admit that the anti-argument had a point.

"Reasonable, justified and just-in-place!"

"I finally know how to deal with my parents, and next time I'll try to convince them with these arguments."

"Obviously, the opposing side has made very adequate preparations in advance, and the argument is really good!"

"It's so enjoyable to listen to, it's so cool to watch the master's moves!"

"I thought the opponent would fall into the trap! However, it reversed so quickly, haha! ”

"Don't jump to conclusions, it's too early!"