Since the press conference of the film awards, it has been known all over the country, even in Asia, and even in the United States and the West.

But that's not all, all of a sudden, there were overwhelming advertisements on the whole network and even many media outlets, including world-famous film directors, screenwriters, actors, critics, etc.

The same sentence they said in the video was: "Aside from language, geographical restrictions, and ideology, let the film return to the art of film itself, and the first Annual Film Awards look forward to your participation." As one of the judges of the film awards, I will uphold the principle of fairness, justice and openness, cast my sacred vote, and accept the inspection and supervision of the public. ”

The lethality of this advertisement is still there, because there are thousands of judges densely packed, and they are all verifiable.

The newly established official website of the Film of the Year Award also details the information of each judge, which is publicly available, and they have been verified and registered on the Tuan Tuan Video website.

And through the introduction of the official website, the number of judges will be increased to 12,000 before the official award, and a mathematical model is also listed, the rules and procedures of the voting room, how to be open and fair, etc.

The number of visitors to the website has also increased by leaps and bounds, with many people flocking to the website to see more details.

"The film award with the largest number of judges in history will be born"

"The film awards, which claim to break all obstacles, will be held, we can wait and see"

"The so-called putting aside all prejudices, but still restricting conditions"

"Where to challenge Hollywood's layout step by step, the United States should be vigilant"

"The world needs a second Oscar, a more open Oscar, and it should move towards diversity"

"It is important to support the new film awards, to build a more open and inclusive film awards, and to allow global films to compete on a level playing field"

……

The attitudes and comments of each country are different, and the netizen judges in each country are also different.

There are those who are for it, and there are those who are against.

The supportive recognition of He Fang said to break all restrictions and let more people participate in the evaluation of awards, which is not in line with the Western price concept, it must be a good movie, and if it does not meet it, it must not be a good movie.

What is opposed is who is challenging the ideology of the West and challenging the values of the West, and this is absolutely not allowed.

How did the Berlinale come about? That is, the Americans want to hold a film festival that specifically promotes the good system of the West, and this film festival is specially awarded to those films that promote the good system of the West and expose the bad things of the Soviet Union.

Therefore, at the insistence of the Berlin Film Festival, they slowly corrupted the ideology of the Soviets, and they were also one of the helpers in the final collapse of the Soviet Union.

And the 'Film of the Year Award' held by He Fang looks mediocre and not brilliant at all, but what he does will corrode the authority of the Oscars.

Because once the annual film award has set a benchmark in the hearts of various filmmakers, then the Oscar will be reduced to an Oscar that only Americans or English-speaking regions care about, and the global audience will pay more attention to the annual film award.

After all, the Oscars can't be participated in by their country's films, but the films of their countries can participate in the Film of the Year Awards fairly, and then compete with the best films from various countries.

It's like a country's national games, you can't compete in the Olympics, the national games, but your own people are competing, but the Olympics are global people competing, how can this attention compare?

There are also discussions on the Internet that He Fang's annual film awards are so open, which is obviously fighting with the Oscars. What if the Oscars also loosened restrictions and engaged in a global opening up that 'put aside language, geography, and ideology'? Didn't it directly kill the limelight of the annual film awards?

In response to this discussion, wise netizens replied.

"This is a conspiracy of He Fang, which means playing with open cards. Where can he do this kind of open film awards, but you can't Oscar. Why can't the Oscars be opened? Because the Oscars are not open in order to control the output of ideology, once it is released, it may not be a Hollywood movie at all that may win the award, nor will it be a film in the English-speaking region, so what should we do? What is the significance of this Oscar? Therefore, if the Oscars do not follow, they will fall behind the Annual Film Award in form, and follow, then the ideological control of the Oscars will be dismantled. He Fang's trick is clever and admired. ”

"The three major film festivals are also global film selections and awards for global films, why can they control ideology the same? Can't the Oscars choose movies from all over the world? Some netizens were not convinced and raised this question.

"Upstairs, the reason why the three major film festivals can still control their ideology is because of the nine-person jury system adopted by the three major film festivals, that is, the minority judging system, as long as they affect these nine people. But if there are more than 10,000 judges from all over the world, how can we control it? ”

"That's right, the judges let go, and the movies are released, so they lose control over what movies to choose and what movies to choose. This is wonderful, although it is not the most clever, but it can also give Americans a headache. ”

"I'm a little puzzled, why did the Americans allow this film award to be put up somewhere?"

Just when netizens wondered why the Americans allowed him to get this film award, a media reporter interviewed Sid Gannis, president of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

"Chairman Sid, what do you think of the annual film award initiated by Chinese directors? Will it affect the status of the Oscars? The reporter asked Sid.

"As for where to hold this film award, they have been communicating with us for a long time. The selection of films for this annual film award is limited to the Asian region and will not affect the Oscars.

The Oscars have been held for more than 80 years, and during this time, many new film awards have been established, but they have always shaken our position in the future. So, I don't think an Asian award can replace the Oscars.

Of course, the concept of 'regardless of language, region, and ideology' is indeed very novel, but the number of high-quality films in Asia every year is limited, and except for a few countries such as China, Japan and South Korea, which have some acceptable films, other countries and regions cannot produce very good films.

The quality of the film is not comparable to the quality of Western films, so there is no need to worry at this point, maybe with the competition for the annual film awards, the Oscars will become even better. ”

Sid Gannis said confidently.

"What about Mr. Sid, will the Oscars break the restrictions of language, region and ideology, and also expand the scope of the Oscars?" The journalist asked.

"Not for the time being, but if some foreign language films are really outstanding, our Oscars have always been very open, and we will also give some awards to foreign language films, which has been proven in countless Oscars."

What Sid said is true, it is true that some foreign language films will also be nominated for Best Picture, nominated for Best Director, Best Actor, etc., and even won Best Director, Best Actor, etc.

"Then the Oscars will be held at any party's annual film awards?" The journalist asked.

"This family is going to hold a film festival, and we can't stop it. U.S. hegemony is not about restricting other people's legitimate behavior, we can only say that we try to improve our own competitiveness. Sid said this very vaguely, that is, this thing may have gone beyond the ordinary level and risen to a higher level.

So, it's not like they can stop it if they say stop it.

A lot of things are exchanges and compromises, since people can do this award, it means that all the links have been opened.

As soon as the interview with Sid came out, the whole world understood.

Sid is nothing more than expressing two meanings, one is to belittle the status and strength of the Annual Film Award as much as possible, and the other is to say that the United States cannot suppress the Annual Film Award.

Since even Sid said so, many of those who shouted for the suppression of the annual film awards were silent, just saying that there are no good movies in Asia.

But in fact, it is not up to others to decide whether there are good movies in Asia, and many people only see the side of the annual film awards, and do not see the hidden line of this award.

In fact, the hidden thread of the annual film award is that it has reached an agreement with the film departments of various countries, that is, the nominated films must have the legal broadcast rights in cinemas, TV and the Internet in various countries.

What is this? This is an alternative unified market, breaking through the barriers of various countries for the promotion and distribution of films, this is another means of Hefang.

For example, in the Indian market, it was difficult for films from other countries to enter before, right? So after signing this agreement, did the movie go in? That's a big market of 1.3 billion people.

Is the rest of Asia hungry for this market? Of course.

In the same way, China will also be open to other countries, so there will be an incentive for Indian films to participate in this award.

Moreover, in proportion, the number of judges in China is comparable to that in India, and the number of judges in China is less than 10 percent more.

This makes the Indians feel that this is quite fair, the number of judges is about the same, and the open market is about the same size. Although they still want the lion to open their mouths and ask for more shares, this is not okay.

When talking to Indians, they are very cunning, always trying to take all the benefits into their arms, this kind of thing is very ungenerous. Because of this character of the Indians, such a country cannot develop.

How can you always want to take advantage of others, but you don't fulfill your obligations? Therefore, in order to prevent them from playing tricks, the relevant provisions have blocked the way for them to play tricks.

There are only two ways for them to play tricks, one is not to screen a considerable number of films in India according to the agreement, and not to show a considerable number of films on television and on the Internet. The second is that they refuse to pay the income from the screening, which they often do, and there is a saying in the international community that 'India makes money and India spends, and they want to take it home'.

In order to prevent this, the agreement has long stipulated that it must be subject to the supervision and review of the organizing committee, and then transfer the relevant expenses.

It is a very reasonable thing for other countries to think that there is no problem with these equality clauses, and that is why they have done so long.

Double monthly pass at the end of the month, all the old irons, support it!

(End of chapter)