(Duplicate chapters, please do not subscribe again)

With He Fang's choking and Director Wang's explanation, the following "China Film Policy Dialogue" really discussed some useful topics, and some people in the audience also put forward some useful suggestions.

However, the directors of the two literary and artistic films were silent in the audience, and they were still angry, feeling that literary films were not treated fairly and justly.

Whether it has not been treated unjustly has to be seen from a higher dimension.

When a country or a system is at the top of the world, they will become much more open and open-minded, and they will not be afraid of being exposed and exposed, because they are strong enough and confident enough.

However, a country or a system is in a weak position, and at this time, the national confidence is a little insufficient, and even they want to run away after paying a sum of money. At this time, you have to learn from those top countries to play what to play with openness and open-mindedness, exposing shortcomings and self-deprecation...... Hehe, that plays a role is the reaction force.

Your country will think: no wonder we are not a developed country, not the richest civilization, or because we are so black, so many problems.

Once people reach such a consensus, they will hope for change, and perhaps social unrest will occur.

There is a saying called: know etiquette and know etiquette, and know honor and disgrace when you have enough food and clothing.

What honor and disgrace do people who can't eat enough talk about? How many people put down their dignity and kneel down their honor and disgrace because of a bite to eat?

What is it? This is a lack of food and clothing and not knowing honor and disgrace.

Why do many Chinese people yearn for the West and become the leading party? It's because you don't know honor and disgrace because you don't know rich. In such a situation, if news and film works are allowed to smear and criticize the country indiscriminately, the trust of the people will collapse completely.

This is like the Chinese who went abroad in the past, always felt inferior because of their poverty, and then curry favor with foreign adults. And in 2023, Chinese go abroad to look down at foreign countries, because many things abroad are not as good as China, in this case do they still please foreign adults? No, it's disgusting that foreigners stink all over and don't pay attention to hygiene, which is not good.

It's a pity that some people who rely on literary films to win awards can't understand these things, and they feel that the state restricts them from making certain works to affect them from winning awards, so they have to jump out and criticize.

He is not used to them, so he has criticized this practice in public more than once. Today, he didn't even know that this forum was openly discussing and criticizing policies, how could he bear this?

So where is the whole firepower to criticize some people who are selfish and pandering to the West?

In order to cater to the West and enhance the influence of the Shanghai Film Festival, they thought that they could let them show some more 'open' films and give awards to some more 'open' films.

After the end of the forum in the morning, the reporters who came to cover the Shanghai Film Festival also surrounded him.

"Director Fang, why are you so opposed to criticizing our own film and television works? Isn't it okay to self-correct? That's not a bad thing. The reporter asked.

"I'm not against making these films, but if someone treats this thing as a business, it distorts. I heard that some people searched all over Shanghai in order to shoot the dirty mess in Shanghai, and finally found a dirty mess in a corner, and then took it out and sent it to participate in the award abroad. Can this represent Shanghai?

When anything has an exchange value for profit, then that thing becomes distorted. As I said on the forum just now, my "Single Zoo" and "Sunburn Heart" did not criticize our system, but I can still win awards.

Some people can't make movies by themselves, and if they don't improve their own level, they blame the system for restricting them, and this kind of person is crooked. I'm against this, not literary films. ”

He Fang said indignantly.

"Where is the director, then why don't you continue to make literary films? Why don't you dare to criticize domestic things? A reporter asked.

"Who said I didn't make literary films? "Dallas Buyers Club" didn't win an award? "Room" didn't win an award? Some people just shrank in China to dig up some black material from their own homes to win an award, but I went out and went to the world to find something meaningful to shoot and win an award.

Besides, I am not a professional literary film director, I make more commercial films for ordinary audiences. I don't think winning awards is the only thing a film director is pursuing, and if that's the case, Cameron, Spielberg, Christopher Nolan, David Yates, Michael Bay, Peter Jackson and others are all people who can't get on the stage?

Also, is it implying that I don't have more awards than those directors who make literary films in China? How many directors in China have won more awards than me? Who is in a position to question me?

Some people secretly shoot some anti-national and anti-national film and television works every day, and then go to curry favor with foreigners, and if they can't win awards, they blame us for not letting them make more anti-national and anti-national works, how is such a person different from the Belt and Road Party? ”

He Fang is so hard-hearted, which is also the reason why he didn't give up award-winning movies much at the beginning of his career, because you haven't won an award, you don't speak hard in front of the public, and if you win an award and have a box office, it's different, and you are tough when you speak.

And this remark of He Fang will also cause a storm in the next public opinion, because he compares those who criticize to the leading party, isn't this a hornet's nest?

But the organizing committee of the Shanghai Film Festival is happy to see it, and the louder the noise at the Shanghai Film Festival, the more beneficial it will be to their attention.

Even if it is a quarrel, it also shows that the Shanghai Film Festival is the most open film festival in China and dares to discuss sensitive issues.

At noon, the organizing committee of the Shanghai Film Festival organized a luncheon, but the two directors of literary films did not participate and left angrily.

even said to reporters: "Director He Fang is too extreme and domineering, he doesn't allow people to talk and don't allow people to shoot different works, and he gives people the name of the party that leads the way at every turn, what is the difference between this and extremism?" ”

This time, it seemed that He Fang had completely broken with these people, and they also released cruel words. Since they are the leading party, they will label them as extremists.

As a result, some people said when talking to the media that He Fang is no longer suitable to be the leader of the Chinese film industry, because he does not know how to unite people in the film industry.

Then after He Fang finished lunch, a reporter asked him what he thought of someone proposing not to let him be the leader of the film industry, which made He Fang laugh.

"Who mentioned this? is still the film industry carrying the handle, is this a gangster? Besides, when are we going to carry the handle? I don't have any official position, and I don't have a civilian position, so don't talk nonsense.

I am very opposed to this statement, obviously a good film industry has to be portrayed as a triad in one word, this kind of person has ill intentions. He Fang criticized.

"The two directors said before that you were too extreme, too domineering. What do you think about this? The reporter continued to ask.

"Is it my extreme domineering, or are they extremely domineering? They want to go to extremes and make some film and television works that smear us, is this extreme? They mobilized insiders and public opinion to force them to change their policies, is this overbearing?

In order to maintain the normal order of the film and maintain the majesty it should have, I criticized them, and they actually bit me in turn and said that I was extremely domineering. Oh, thieves call thieves, and when someone doesn't let their plot succeed, they will pour dirty water on others to smear them.

You can be fair to say, is the whole process that they want to force the relevant departments to give them policies for making films that can win awards abroad and make profits? I'm just publishing what they're doing, even though I'm describing them with a term that they are ashamed of, 'the Belt and Road Party'. But is that the description wrong? Isn't that what they're doing?

Therefore, the eyes of the masses are bright, and everyone can judge for themselves, who is the extreme hegemonism? Who went to extremes? Is it extreme for someone to stop them from being the Belt and Road Party? Some people criticize them for being overbearing?

Don't they shout every day that they want freedom of criticism and freedom of speech? Why can they say that others say that they should be accused of being extremely domineering when others say that they are overbearing? These people play double standards, but it's really slippery. ”

He Fang's sharp rebuttal directly put the reporters alive, they really saw how the most eloquent directors fought the heroes.

The reporters didn't know where Alima was, and they couldn't even fool what was known as China's biggest fool, and they were refuted by him completely, which was quite embarrassing.

At two o'clock in the afternoon, the forum "The Next Stop of Chinese Films: Prosperity on the Left, Crisis on the Right" had not yet begun, and guests from all walks of life who knew who they were going to participate in immediately began to study their positions and speeches.

Otherwise, it would be embarrassing to be sprayed to death by He Fang at the scene, and just as they were studying their speeches at the afternoon forum, the Internet also turned up because of He Fang's remarks in the morning.

"I unswervingly support He, he is right, the eyes of the masses are clear. Are these two directors of literary films forcing us to relax our policies? What is the purpose of their persecution? is to criticize domestic film and television works to win awards, smear the country for their own benefit. I don't think there is anything excessive in saying that they are the leading party, but it is a bit inappropriate for them to criticize He Fang as extremely domineering. ”

"I don't understand, why can't I be critical? How can you make progress without criticizing or exposing? Can turning a blind eye allow the country to develop and the nation to rejuvenate? I also don't understand why someone is trying to cover it up. I used to admire him, but now...... Hehe, it's really extreme. ”

(End of chapter)