How Heroes Are Discredited (Part I)
How the hero was smeared, and the **** boss's "answer 30" [blog post]
The national hero Yuan Chonghuan has become a complete stupid and traitor suspect in the mouth of the **** boss, which is really amazing. Some people continue to praise the **** boss for his rich research, reasonableness, clearing the fog of history, and finding out the real sinners............ I don't know if it's the **** boss's vest who said these words, I only know that the "research" and "reasoning" of the **** boss are full of wanton fabrication, tampering and confusion.
Recently, the **** boss has published a large number of articles in the iron-blooded deep water area to denigrate Yuan Chonghuan, but in fact, the views and arguments are similar. This is also the characteristic of this leftist, who constantly copies himself to cheat his work. But strangely, this kind of repeated irrigation behavior, the system should not allow it, but the **** boss can do it. I only read this person's "Refutation Article" and found 30 serious falsifications and contradictions and pointed out them one by one. I didn't expect the **** boss to be cheeky enough to mess around, so he simply spent some effort and carefully broke these 30 questions and crushed them for everyone to see clearly. Articles 12, 22, 24, and 28 are extremely obvious and deliberately falsifying history books to falsify history, and are extremely egregious in nature. It can be said that such an act only needs to occur once, and it should be unqualified to talk about history.
1) There are three or five sentences in this paragraph that come from the mouth of someone who opposes my point of view, and it turns out to be a classic to refute his own point of view, so it is also a glory of victory to be able to use this matter, and it is not difficult to use your own narrative, but it does not have this flavor :)
In addition, you have more problems than being an idiot at the end of the world, after the "Ningyuan War", Jin was pouring out of the nest, the whole people were mobilized, and there were Mongolian tribes participating, and there were Mongolian cavalry who attacked Juehua Island, so it is not surprising that there are 130,000, and even the hardcore Yuan Fan like Yan Chongnian, president of the Beijing Manchu Society, has not denied it, and also used this as an important argument for "disparity in strength".
=========================
Compared with the original text of Tianya netizen "Mulong Yin", there are 6 plagiarized sentences in your entire paragraph. Quotes are OK, but be aware of the basic morality. 1. Please mark quotations and indicate the source for quotations;2. Please do not quote out of context.
"On the fourteenth day of the first month, the Mandate of Heaven Khan Nurhachi personally led the kings and ministers, commanding an army of 60,000, known as 200,000, to attack Ningyuan. Excerpt from Chapter 17 of "Sixty Years of the Death of the Ming Dynasty and the Reign of the Qing Dynasty", "Ningyuan Great Victory", Yan Chongnian.
2) Gao Di was in Shanhaiguan and ordered Ningyuan and Jinzhou to withdraw all the people who could withdraw, but it was not he who organized the retreat, but it should be Yuan Chonghuan and these people, but Lord Yuan went from Yang Fengyin to blatant disobedience, and did not organize the retreat at all, so it caused that kind of situation, you blame Gao Di who is far away in Shanhaiguan?
========================
During the Ningyuan War, Yuan Chonghuan's position was Ningqiandao, and the jurisdiction was Ningyuan and Qiantun. The 100,000 stone of grain that Gao Di dropped during the retreat of Jinzhou, can you also wronged Yuan Chonghuan? "It was not he himself who organized the retreat, but Yuan Chonghuan and these people", please come up with historical evidence, don't be untrue.
3) Gao Di also has no weather forecast, how can he know that he is going to retreat? Lord Yuan himself does not have a strategic vision and a degree of calculation of the weather, which can only show that he is a fool.
========================
In the Ming and Qing wars, the sixth year of the Apocalypse was the most unusually cold year. Until June, the sea was still frozen, and Mao Wenlong's Dongjiang River began to run out of grain in March, and it was not until June that he received food and salary from Jindeng. Therefore, the Ming army was unexpectedly defeated on Juehua Island in the Battle of Ningyuan that took place in the first month of this year. Juehua Island is located on several small islands 36 miles east of Ningyuan. Originally, before the Houjin army attacked, the defenders of Juehua Island dug a fifteen-mile-wide ice trough into the slightly frozen sea and built fortifications with a vehicle formation. But no one could have predicted that when Nurhachi attacked, the temperature dropped unprecedentedly sharply, and the sea near Juehua Island quickly froze, and the defenders on the island dug through the ice every day, and the next day it froze again. When Nurhachi failed to win for two consecutive days under the city of Ningyuan, he turned his attention to Juehua Island. The Eight Banners cavalry ran across the frozen sea and destroyed the Ming army's naval stronghold.
As an ancient man in the sixteenth century, Yuan Chonghuan did not have the ability and intelligence to predict the weather, which is a matter of course. But the **** boss obviously thinks that Gao Di, who ordered the retreat of Jinzhou, has this ability and foresight. So may I ask, what does the unusually cold weather have to do with the defense of Jinzhou, which is located inland? What can give the **** boss a powerful slap in the face is that if the Ming army can predict this abnormal climate, then it is obvious that the role of the Juehua Island arranged by Sun Chengzong will be greatly reduced, and the defense capability of the Ningyuan defense line will be weakened by God - the Jinzhou defense line should not be discarded. Therefore, there is a logical paradox here: if Gao Di could have predicted the weather in advance, it would have been a foolish move to abandon Jinzhou.
Whether it is the ancients of the Ming and Qing dynasties, or the full-time historical researchers of modern times, Gao Di's stupidity and cowardice have always been the most despicable one among the successive Liaodong Economic Strategies. The big guy deliberately concealed the historical fact that Gao Di retreated in panic and gave away 100,000 stone of grain to Nurhachi (now he is lying to this charge on the head of Yuan Chonghuan of Ningqian Dao), and praised Gao Di's shameless act of abandoning the land without permission, so reversing black and white and pointing to the deer as a horse to lift an incompetent person to the sky, the purpose of which is to insult the real hero Yuan Chonghuan. As everyone knows, this kind of shoddy trick of falsifying history, once it is exposed by others, can make people completely doubt whether the whole argument is based on truth.
4) The order to retreat was given by Gao Di, and Lord Yuan and others were the executors, and the execution was not effective, so this responsibility should naturally be borne by Lord Yuan and others, whether it was 80,000 stone or 100,000 stone, wasn't it all because there was no retreat? Didn't Gao Di call for the grain to be withdrawn? The failure to withdraw can only be said to be the evil result of Lord Yuan and others' disobedience and public disobedience.
In addition, I quoted the "tens of thousands" recorded in the "History of the Ming Dynasty", and you said that there was a problem, emphasizing that only more than 10,000 died, so you should go to court with the "History of the Ming Dynasty".
Besides, compared with the death of more than 10,000 people and the hundreds of casualties in Houjin, it is called "victory"? Of course, Lord Yuan's "victory" is indeed different :)
========================
The more than 100,000 stone of grain "sent" to Nurhachi by Jinzhou Youtun and other places was entirely the responsibility of Gao Di and the Jinzhou guards. The big guy repeatedly used "Lord Yuan and others" here, and he didn't dare to omit the word "wait" every time, which was actually a manifestation of his weakness of heart - he knew very well in his heart that Jinzhou Youtun and other places had nothing to do with Yuan Chonghuan during the Ningyuan War, so he could only use the word "wait" to fool - can the truth of history be fooled like this?
In all the figures related to Yuan Chonghuan's history, the **** boss has always adopted the standard: regardless of the facts, only take the most unfavorable figures for Yuan Chonghuan recorded in all historical books. For example, in the Battle of Ningyuan, even the figure of more than 500 dead and wounded recorded in the "Manchu Old Files" was not adopted, and only the number of 260 beheadings reported by Yuan Chonghuan after the war was the standard, and a large number of historical records recorded the fact that the Jin army burned the corpses outside the city during the war. In the battle of Juehua Island, this standard was once again applied by the **** boss. After countless historical researchers recognized the casualties of this battle as 14,000 soldiers and civilians based on the first-hand historical materials recorded by the Ming people, and I raised this fact to the **** boss in different forums, he still only used the "History of the Ming Dynasty", which recorded the largest number of this matter, as the standard. Without it, do everything possible to discredit Yuan Chonghuan to the greatest extent.
As to whether the Battle of Ningyuan was a victory, we might as well compare it with the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression -- the number of Chinese deaths was much higher than that of Japan, and the victors were counted as China or Japan? Quite simply, Japan's attempt to invade China did not succeed, China maintained its territorial integrity, and the victor was, of course, China. Similarly, although the Ming Dynasty suffered more casualties than the Later Jin Dynasty (and it is rare to include the casualties of the non-military population in the casualty ratio between the two sides), the Battle of Ningyuan was the first time that the Ming Dynasty successfully defended its territory since the war with the Jurchens. "Records of Emperor Taizuwu of the Qing Dynasty", "(Nurhachi) since the age of 20 since the expedition, invincible, invincible, only Ning Yuan could not go down a city, so he returned with great resentment."
5) On the 25th, the cannon was fired, and on the 27th, Nurhachi received a report from the fast horse, which is normal...... Shenyang to Ningyuan 600 miles, converted into kilometers is only 300 kilometers, a fast horse can't run in a day?30 kilometers per hour what is the speed? 10 hours to finish, and the horse's running speed is 60 kilometers per hour :)
========================
On the night of the 25th, the artillery was fired, and on the morning of the 27th, Nurhachi withdrew his troops, so assuming that Nurhachi did withdraw his troops after receiving a message from Shenyang, the time taken by the messenger was almost only one day and one night, that is, 24 hours. If the horse's running speed is indeed 60 kilometers per hour, running 600 miles in 24 hours is really nothing. But what horse can run at top speed for 24 hours in a row? It is estimated that only the German BMW is the only one. In ancient times, it was true that there was an expedited delivery speed of 800 miles, but this could only be achieved when the horses were constantly changing along the way. Nurhachi conquered Ningyuan, and arranged a lot of post stations along the way?
I also have an error in the distance I estimated earlier, refer to the actual map according to the scale roughly calculated, the distance from Shenyang to Ningyuan is no less than 800 miles.
There is a record that can be referred to is that in the battle of Ding Mao in the seventh year of the Apocalypse, Yizhou was conquered on the morning of the 14th day of the first month, and the report was only received in Shenyang on the 16th, and the distance from Shenyang to Yizhou was about 500 miles. It was almost a day and a night to run 250 miles ~ 300 miles, and the speed of Houjin information transmission was at this level at that time.
In addition, regarding the fact that Mao Wenlong sent a few people to set off cannons outside Shenyang on the night of the 25th, only Mao Wenlong's own Tang newspaper said so. However, it has long been a tradition for Mao Wenlong to falsely report his military exploits, and more than two-thirds of the battles reported by him in the Tang Newspaper over the years cannot be found in the historical materials of the Manchu Qing Dynasty, and even if there is a right one, the number of enemies injured is at least ten times the difference. And the matter of setting off guns in Shenyang happens to be unrecorded in "Manchu Old Files" and "Qing Taizu Records". In fact, after the Battle of Ningyuan, Mao Wenlong, who was Wei Zhongxian's godson, was questioned by the Ministry of War for his ineffective containment, and was ordered to explain by the Emperor of the Apocalypse, which is enough to witness Mao Wenlong's inaction.
However, the **** boss is missing to use Mao Wenlongtang's report as the basis for this lonely evidence, leaving aside all the official records of the Ming and Qing dynasties, and even far-fetched Mao Wenlong's role to the decisive factor, and even creating a 24-hour horse race for 800 miles.
6) In March of the sixth year of the Apocalypse (1626), "the eunuch Liu Yingkun guarded the mountain customs", "ordered the ministers of the king of Liaodong to supervise the pass, and the outside of the pass was commanded by Yuan Chonghuan, the governor of Liaodong", "Yuan Chonghuan accompanied Yingkun, Yong, and led the teaching to tour Jinzhou, Da and Xiaoling River, and discussed the great development of Tuntian, and gradually restored the abandoned old land", and then Nurhachi died of illness in August of the sixth year of the Apocalypse (1626), and Yuan went to mourn.
Lord Yuan's repair of Jinzhou and other cities should have begun in the first half of the sixth year of the Apocalypse (1626), while the Battle of Ningjin was carried out in May and June of the following year, the seventh year of the Apocalypse (1627......
Sun Chengzong garrisoned Jinzhou and other cities in June of the fifth year of the Apocalypse (1625), and Gaodi came in October.
=======================
"Touring" is the meaning of building a city? ****The understanding of the ancient text of the **** boss is really unique. In February of the seventh year of the Apocalypse, Yuan Chonghuan asked to build the three cities of Jinzhou, but it was clear that there was a record of twists and turns. Do you think that just after the end of the Ningyuan War in March of the sixth year, Yuan Chonghuan could start to build Jinzhou without repairing Ningyuan first? Do you think that Yuan Chonghuan could master a lot of resources at that time and could continuously overhaul the fortified city?
Jinzhou was repaired for three months before the Ningjin War, and Jinzhou City was repaired for four months when Gao withdrew in the tenth month. Can Jinzhou, which has been repaired for three months, be able to hold it, but it can't be held after four months? Moreover, Nurhachi only came over at the end of the first month of the following year, and the one who gave up the construction of the fortifications in advance was the wise and martial man in the mouth of the **** boss.
7) According to Yan Chongnian, president of the Beijing Manchurian Society of the hardcore Yuan Fan, when Houjin attacked Ningyuan, he found that there was cooking smoke on Juehua Island, so he reconnoitred and found out the situation on Juehua Island
======================
Note that your own original text is "Houjin came here to rob the grain and grass, and they began to attack Ningyuan City, of course, they wanted to break the city and plunder the heavy grain and grass inside, but later they found that the grain and grass on Juehua Island did not retreat into Ningyuan City";
Here, you first changed the topic and changed whether there was grain and grass in Ningyuan City to whether there was grain and grass on Juehua Island. Secondly, "I found that there was cooking smoke on Juehua Island, so I reconnoitred and found out the situation on Juehua Island" from which book by Yan Chongnian, you might as well quote it in the original text. In the chapter "The Battle of Juehua Island" in "The Fifteenth Year of the Ming Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty", there is definitely none. I really want to know, before Houjin attacked Juehua Island, he had already reconnoitred and knew that Ningyuan City had no grain and Juehua Island had accumulated a large amount of grain and grass, whether it was Yan Chongnian or the **** boss.
In fact, on the issue of Nurhachi's 130,000-strong army conquering Ningyuan in the front, we have found that the **** boss has a very ridiculous bad habit: pushing his own nonsense onto Yan Chongnian's head. As everyone knows, because Yan Chongnian showed his face on CCTV, his things are everywhere on the Internet - if you want to plant a false accusation, find an unpopular person to spread.
8) If Lord Yuan can turn his own losses into "tens of thousands" and his opponent's only a few hundred battles can be turned into "victory", can't he say that the looted grain was "burned"?
=====================
In the Tang newspaper, it was reported that 80,000 grains were burned by the minister of the governor of Liaodong. It is not only the Ming side that was burned but also the Qing side, and all the historical materials are very consistent.
The big guy once again insulted Yuan Chonghuan.
9) A fast horse is at least 60 kilometers an hour, and it only takes 5 hours to run 10,000 kilometers and 300 kilometers, and there are 24 hours a day...... In addition, your BMW "new" can't run 300 kilometers in a day or two?haha~!!
=====================
This is a conjecture that has already been analyzed. The Houjin messenger, who can keep running at the highest speed for 24 hours in a row, is not riding a "BMW", can it still be a horse of flesh and blood?
10) Whether there is the word "Mao" or not does not affect the fact that there are only two days to attack "Ningyuan", and this proves that it is not that Houjin cannot attack, but that there is no white-hot offensive at all, and what is the reason for the lack of time to attack, isn't it that Mao Shuai plagiarized the rear?
=====================
Your original text is:
'A man's heart is like iron' proposed in the article: "In the "Records of Emperor Taizuwu of the Qing Dynasty", it is recorded that '(Nurhachi) has been invincible and invincible since he was twenty years old. It has been made clear that even Houjin admits that this is a defeat. ”
- Comment: This sentence can only show that Nurhachi did not capture Ningyuan City, and the real reason is not that Ningyuan is holding very well, but because Mao Shuai copied its rear and forced it to retreat in a hurry.
From this sentence (since the age of twenty years old, invincible, invincible, only Ningyuan can not take a city, so he returned with great resentment) It can be seen that Nurhachi thinks that the reason why he did not defeat Ningyuan is Mao Wenlong's plagiarism, and the **** boss is really meritorious. As everyone knows, all the historical materials of the Manchu Qing Dynasty do not record that Mao Wenlong had any military actions before and after the Battle of Ningyuan, and even Mao Wenlong's Tang newspaper only said that he sent a few people to shoot guns outside Shenyang to bluff - this kind of small action is called "plagiarism"?!
Ning Yuan only fought for two days, and the battle did not enter the white heat, and Houjin retreated, what is the reason? "The cannon went through, killed the northern cavalry, and the Yellow Dragon Curtain, and injured the king", but the **** boss had to ignore history and create a Mao Shuai to plagiarize the rear.
11) I'm sorry, but Yan Chongnian, the hardcore Yuan Fan and president of the Beijing Manchu Society, didn't find such a big thing in the Manchu Qing archives, which is the same as there is no "anti-plot" in the archives of the Ming Dynasty :)
====================
If there is no record in the Manchu archives, there must not exist? Why don't you use the Manchu archives when you list Mao Wenlong's military exploits?
Mao Wenlong's record is the only evidence of his family's words, but the incident of shelling and wounding the enemy chief is recorded in both the Ming Dynasty and North Korea.
The reason for the Jin retreat after the Ningyuan War, the content recorded by the Ming Dynasty and Korea is not acceptable, but you can also accept it. So, the Qing Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty, and North Korea have not recorded that they all rely on Mao Wenlong's plagiarism, why do you want to fabricate it without any basis?
12) The time of the recorded archives is not the time when the chapter was issued, this phenomenon has appeared many times in the archives of both the Ming and Qing dynasties, it is not surprising, your specialty is to say that the historical materials are wrong, and you are correct, I am used to it.
In addition, August of the sixth year of the Apocalypse was the time when Nurhachi died, and at that time, Houjin still had a mind about Da Ning Jin? Lord Yuan was afraid of going to mourn at that time, if Mao Shuai went to fight Houjin at that time, then Lord Yuan would still repay the merits, and the anger was almost ......
====================
What I have pointed out is that the "Records of the Liao Facts of the Three Dynasties" and the "Records of the Letters of the Two Dynasties" are very clearly recorded that Yuan Chonghuan's letter was reported in August of the sixth year of the Apocalypse, but you arbitrarily changed it to "The Records of the Liao Facts of the Three Dynasties, Volume 18, August of the 7th Year of the Apocalypse, Yuan Chonghuan, the Governor of Liaodong; There are no mistakes at all in the history books of the Ming Dynasty, but the clear and understandable history books have been secretly tampered with by you!
In August of the seventh year of the Apocalypse, Yuan Chonghuan had already resigned from the government and served the people a month earlier, so what kind of twists and turns did he make?
After the Ningyuan War in the first month of the sixth year of the Apocalypse, the imperial court added officials to the meritorious ministers, and the matter of rewarding them did not end until March. After the reward was over, the imperial court began to withdraw the guilty people. The first to bear the brunt was Gao Di and the Liaodong General Army, followed by Mao Wenlong, who did nothing. Under Mao Wenlong's repeated requests, from the fourth year of the Apocalypse, the imperial court began to give Mao Wenlong's Dongjiang an annual salary of 400,000 yuan. However, the facts of the Ningyuan War found that the town of Dongjiang, which had spent a lot of food, was almost useless. As a result, the imperial court began to doubt Mao Wenlong's unilateral reports over the years, and the two officials who sent the envoy to Korea "incidentally" verified the actual strength of the Dongjiang army on the return trip: the 170,000 troops that Mao Wenlong had been reporting could only use 20,000 or 30,000. By August, the imperial court found that all of the 200,000 grains and 200,000 salaries each year had not been distributed to the soldiers. As a result, Mao Wenlong claimed that the amount had been embezzled by successive financial officers, and he had not known anything about it for two years. According to Mao's report, the results of his investigation were that the financial officer's method of corruption was to take a kickback of 30% of the money disbursed. Then at least sixty percent or seventy percent of them have been implemented. But Mao Wenlong's report was that all the salary was gone. Obviously, Mao Wenlong himself may well have embezzled the biggest piece. From the 2nd of August to 22nd of August, the Lushun City under the Dongjiang mutinied, and the chaos in the management of the Dongjiang River reached its peak.
Yuan Chonghuan's letter was reported in August of that year, and after careful investigation of its contents, it should be about Mao Wenlong's attack on Anshan in April. This is the only diversion operation that Mao Wenlong can confirm, but unfortunately it is not the action of Houjin to attack Ming, but Nurhachi's battle against Mongolia. After the Ningyuan War, Yuan Chonghuan was appointed as the governor of Liaodong, and he naturally wanted to accomplish something with a heavy responsibility on his shoulders. Around June, Yuan Chonghuan sent his general Xu Fujuan to the Dongjiang River to liaise with Mao Wenlong to coordinate the plan of recovering Liao. Therefore, when Mao Wenlong faced the criticism of the court, Yuan Chonghuan took this letter in August and said good things for Mao Wenlong. This is the chronological background of Yuan Chonghuan's writing of this letter.
However, because there is the word "Jinning" in this letter, the **** boss has found something that can be done. Because the "Three Dynasties Liao Facts" and "Two Dynasties from the Letter" that recorded this letter are relatively unpopular wild histories, ordinary people will not see them, so the **** boss took the initiative to change the time recorded in the history book to report the folds by one year, and simply interpreted the word "Jinning" in the text as the Ningjin War a year later!
13) Your logic is too peculiar, since you all know that someone's brother betrayed the Ming Dynasty and killed him, then may I ask if this person's brother was betraying the Ming Dynasty? And are these people reused by Lord Yuan? I said that Lord Yuan appointed a group of traitors who had been in charge of more than 20 years to hold important positions in Dongjiang Town, and later re-joined Houjin? You have already admitted in your own words that these people did betray, what else do you quibble?
=====================
"This person's brother" betrayed the Ming Dynasty, which means that these people all betrayed the Ming Dynasty? You can expand it to "a group of traitors who have been in charge of the Ming Dynasty for more than 20 years and held important positions in Dongjiang Town, and later returned to Houjin"?
Liu Xingqi has seven brothers, and he was indeed engaged in Houjin at the beginning, and Liu Xingqi was accepted as a son-in-law by Nurhachi. But in the Chongzhen period, Liu Xingqi fled to the Ming Dynasty, and the rest of the brothers also returned to the Ming Dynasty from Houjin and became Dongjiang generals. It is undeniable that the Liu brothers have been traitors, although the time is not more than 20 years when you are untrustworthy, but about 10 years, but this is also an unchangeable fact. However, what did the Liu brothers do after they returned to the Ming Dynasty? Among the seven brothers, the most famous deeds are Liu Xingqi, Liu Xingji, and Liu Xingzhi, who are ranked second, third, and fifth respectively. After Yuan Chonghuan killed Mao Wenlong on Phi Dao, he reorganized the Dongjiang Army into the Four Associations and appointed Liu Xingqi as the commander of one of them. Soon after, the four associations were changed to the second associations, and Liu Xingqi still served as the leader of one of the associations. It should be pointed out that in the two reorganizations, another Chen Jisheng has always been the co-leader. And until Yuan Chonghuan was imprisoned, the supreme person in charge of Dongjiang was Chen Jisheng, and Liu Xingqi needed to obey his command. And Chen Jisheng's identity is Mao Wenlong's father-in-law and think tank - Yuan Chonghuan was so appointed, obviously for the stability of the Dongjiang army. After Yuan Chonghuan was imprisoned, Sun Chengzong took over the Liao affairs and transferred Liu Xingzhu to Ningyuan, and Liu Xingzhu's position as the assistant leader of Phi Dao was taken over by Liu Xingzhi. After that, Liu Xingqi used his expertise in knowing the command banner in the Later Jin Army to achieve a victory in a small-scale war, which was rewarded by the imperial court. But in the next battle, Liu Xingqi, who took the lead, was hit by mistake and died on the front line of the anti-Qing Dynasty. At this time, Liu Xingzhi in Phi Dao also achieved a winning record. However, at Liu Xingzheng's memorial ceremony, Liu Xingzhi launched a mutiny on the grounds of unfair treatment of Liu Xingqi after his death, and killed Chen Jisheng, the commander-in-chief of Phi Dao, and a group of his subordinate officers. After the mutiny, Sun Chengzong sent Zhou Wenyu, the deputy commander-in-chief, to Phi Dao to negotiate. The result of the negotiations was a compromise with the imperial court, and Liu Xingzhi led the military affairs on Phi Dao. After that, Liu Xingzhi defeated the Qing army in a small battle. But a few months later, Liu Xingzhi rebelled again, this time the purpose was to reduce the Qing, in this rebellion, Liu Xingji, who had just been transferred back to Phi Dao, resolutely opposed it, and was tied up and beaten by Liu Xingzhi. As a result of Liu Xingzhi's second Phi Dao rebellion, the Ming army sent by Lushun was pacified.
Through the above brief description of history, it can be known that although the Liu brothers used to be traitors, after returning to the Ming Dynasty, at least Liu Xingqi and Liu Xingji were always loyal to the Ming family. And Liu Xingzhi did not have the idea of defecting to the enemy before the second rebellion. Before Yuan Chonghuan's death, it was Liu Xingqi and Liu Xingji who were reused, the former was the co-leader of Phi Dao, and the latter was taken by Yuan Chonghuan to accompany the army in Ningyuan. The rest of the Liu brothers, including Liu Xingzhi, were not given any "important positions" at all when Yuan Chonghuan was in charge of Liao. However, the **** boss recklessly told the truth, called the seven Liu brothers traitors, and framed the rebellion of Liu Xingzhi during Sun Chengzong's tenure on Yuan Chonghuan's head, in essence, he still used ordinary people to not know this deed, and wantonly tampered with history to smear Yuan Chonghuan.
14) At the time of the "Great Battle of Quang Ninh", Hou Jin first attacked Mao Wenlong and then Guangning, and at that time Mao Wenlong had been forced to withdraw to North Korea, and then Jin let go of the attack on Guangning. During the "Ningyuan War", Mao Wenlong attacked the rear of Houjin and forced Houjin to retreat hastily, which has been demonstrated just now. After the "Battle of Ningjin", Jin still fought Mao Shuai first, and when Mao Shuai retreated to Phi Island, he turned to attack Ningjin, and Mao Shuai still killed Liaoyang from Phi Island, which was proved by Lord Yuan in a twist and turn.
In addition, the traitor reused by Lord Yuan in the seven letters said very clearly: "Chief Officer Mao is half-true and half-false in his heart of wanting to surrender...... In my opinion, Khan hesitated and doubted, and it was also said that Chief Officer Mao was indulgent, undetermined at first, and then he was involved, and it was not easy to conclude things. Then the chief military officer Mao deliberately rebelled, that is, he secretly told Yuan Dusi to kill him. I was promoted to the rank of deputy general for my meritorious rebelliousness. ”
=====================
Qing Taizu record: "On November 18, he ordered the second king to lead 5,000 troops, cross the Zhenjiang River, enter Korea, and want to suppress Mao Wenlong's soldiers. To Zhenjiang, he entered the territory of North Korea overnight, killed Liu guerrilla and 1,500 soldiers, and Wenlong was only spared, but returned. ...... The first month of the seventh year of the Mandate of Heaven,...... On the 18th, the emperor led the princes and ministers to conquer Quang Ninh". Indeed, two months before the Guangning War, Houjin beat Mao Wenlong first. But it's not what you said "Mao Wenlong has been forced to withdraw to North Korea", but Mao Wenlong who was killed by Houjin to North Korea to beat - before Houjin sent troops, Mao Wenlong did not enter the Houjin border at all. However, what was the purpose of the imperial court in opening a town in Dongjiang? It was for Mao Wenlong to use guerrilla warfare to contain behind enemy lines. When the enemy advances, I retreat, and when the enemy retreats, I advance, this is Mao Wenlong's own job. He was beaten two months ago, and two months later he did nothing in the Guangning War, is Mao Wenlong a dereliction of duty?
As for the Ningyuan War, I won't repeat it here. If you have to put aside all the history books and conclude out of thin air that it was because Mao Wenlong sent a few people to fire artillery in Shenyang to let Houjin retreat in a hurry (whether this matter is true or not), then first demonstrate how the Houjin messenger ran 800 miles in 24 hours.
As for Mao Wenlong's "contribution" in the Ningjin War, your evidence is purely perjury from tampering with historical data, and I have analyzed it very clearly in question 12.
Finally, there is the "Book of Mao Wenlong" that you quoted, and I have already pointed out the contradictions between this paragraph and the facts. What is strange to me is that I have a lot of things that I have justified and verified in the history books, but you still have to sell treasures everywhere, except for bullying ordinary people for their lack of mastery of historical materials, I can't think of a second explanation.
"Chief Officer Mao is in the heart of his desire to surrender, half-truths and half-truths...... In my opinion, Khan hesitated and doubted, and it was also said that Chief Officer Mao was indulgent, undetermined at first, and then he was involved, and it was not easy to conclude things. Then the chief military officer Mao deliberately rebelled, that is, he secretly told Yuan Dusi to kill him. I was promoted to the rank of deputy general for my meritorious rebelliousness. This passage is recorded in the seventh chapter of the "Book of Mao Wenlong" in the "Manchu Old Files". The meaning of the original words is roughly that Mao Wenlong's attitude towards surrendering to Houjin is half-true and half-false (that is, Mao Wenlong is at both ends of the first mouse between the Ming and Qing dynasties), so the writer simply denounced Mao Wenlong's "deliberate rebellion" to Yuan Chonghuan, so that Yuan Chonghuan killed Mao, and used this as his own way to adopt Yuan Chonghuan's promotion. According to modern general analysis, the second half of the seventh part of the Book of Mao Wenlong was actually originally written by another person, but it was mistakenly classified into the Book of Mao Wenlong when it was archived by the Manchu Dynasty. According to "I was promoted to the rank of deputy general for my meritorious service in rebellion", the most likely identity of the person who judged this passage was Liu Xingqi. But after this text intercepted by the **** boss, there is also a speech that "the third brother is in Ningyuan, and the fourth brother is in Shandong", so it can't be cleared immediately. Liu Xingqi's third brother is Liu Xingji. Therefore, even if Liu Xingqi's death in front of the battle is interpreted as playing too much of a bitter trick, Liu Xingji is undoubtedly loyal to the Ming family. Therefore, if the whole text is analyzed together, we can only draw the following conclusions: 1. The writer of the letter is more likely to be Liu Xingqi; 2. The content of this letter is a lie made in order to win the trust of Huang Taiji as a spy.
In fact, the twelve major crimes listed by Yuan Chonghuan when he killed Mao are enough to discuss Mao Wenlong's capital crimes, among which Mao Wenlong alone said that "Mu Ma Dengzhou takes Nanjing as a backhand" is enough to prove that General Mao's death was not unjust at all.
15) I don't even know how to read the map, I only know YY, which is really pitiful.
How the Laoha River crosses the Great Wall, you can check the map yourself, how it connects to the Luan River, I have already made it very clear.
====================
Take an administrative map, mix the administrative area line and the river route, and boldly write nonsense if you read it wrong, and you are really ignorant and fearless.
Encyclopedia of China (Popular Edition) 1999 edition: "The Liao River, one of the great rivers in northern China. The Laoha River in the upper reaches of the mainstream originates from the Bald Mountain of the Qilaotu Mountains of Hebei Province, and joins the Xila Murong River called the Xiliao River. ”
The source of the Luan River is the boundary river, and the main tributaries are the Xiaoluan River, Xingzhou River, Yixun River, Ant Ant Tu River, Wulie River, Lao Niu River, Liu River, Pu River, Lu River, Qinglong River, there is nothing to do with the Lao Ha River, and the **** boss actually said that the Lao Ha River has been continuously to the mouth of the Luan River, which is really whimsical.
Click on the image link: