At this moment, I feel that the lost time is the same, no matter what I have done in the past, what is the meaning of recalling my past? I don't feel the past that has disappeared at all, what is the meaning to myself, maybe the current achievements, or the future achievements will be different, is this the personal meaning?

It can be said that what you do now is meaningful for your future, and it is meaningless for your past, and it is like this in your own feelings, and in the feelings of others, it is meaningful to do what you will do for a while. Pen | fun | pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

Ordinary people will not be entangled in this matter, only find what they like to do to do, this understanding is just an academic sense of analysis and research, or let people who like to distinguish more clearly what they are doing, this social phenomenon is that many people live in ignorance, but those who know these things feel that they are bored, or maybe they can use these things to do some malicious control, otherwise it is kind to understand some ignorant people.

Or just treat these as academic research, do nothing, and just watch this social phenomenon happen, and if it works like this, maybe it is also good, just as technology can be used in bad ways, used in good things, or just as technology.

I have said that the instantaneity of emotions is that a person cannot always maintain a certain emotion and continue forever, so if you describe your personal emotions at certain times, and only mention that moment, he has a certain emotion, rather than saying that this is the emotion of his life, and magnifying what happened at a certain point in time to a lifetime to evaluate a person itself is a wrong approach, no one always maintains a certain feeling, and bad people will not keep themselves in a bad state all the time, only when they encounter some things and some situations, they make the choices made by bad people。

Many times, we prefer to imitate and learn from other people's lives, this is a phenomenon that exists, it can be seen everywhere, sometimes because of this, we are always led astray by the people around us, and we ourselves will not find out, we are imitating others, then how can we find other people's mistakes, only after comparing with each other, we will find mistakes, and this opportunity to compare with each other is generally less, have been assimilated.

At some stage in the past, I was very receptive to other people's views, and when I read other people's narratives, I always accepted them without resistance, and I always felt that they were all right, and there was nothing to think about.

From my own performance, it is true that after a certain age, it becomes more difficult to accept new points of view, and there are fewer points of view that I agree with, and I can always find the bias and limitations of the other party's narrative, so I don't comment, I don't want to debate, I just know it.

The sense of powerlessness lies in how to write, it is only for oneself to comprehend, and it is only oneself that touches it, in fact, it is also the first time that I comprehend it, and then narrate, some feelings are difficult to describe, and some comprehensions seem to be very superficial, like learning to praise others, this is just according to the phenomenon, comprehend how to get along with others.

There are a lot of this kind of realization in this world, and it is easy for people to summarize their own experience, life experience, and then tell their children that they will pass it on, in fact, it is just like this, and the way of getting along with each other according to the hearts of others is just like this, is there anything else?

Is the comprehension of the relationship between man and other things regarded as a person's personal outlook on life? In addition to these relational comprehensions that make people feel the appearance of feelings, the observation and understanding of phenomena tends to be more emotionless, and it is an objective observation, and in fact, there are phenomena in the relational comprehension, and these are all regarded as objective observations and understandings, which can be regarded as materialist understanding.

What is idealism? The phenomena of one's own imagination do not exist in the real world, just like I have special functions, but in fact I do not, so the difference seems to be relatively clear, and the phenomena of materialism and objective viewing are also easier to understand, and the phenomena that really occur exist in reality.

Of course, when it cannot be proven, cannot be displayed in reality, we say that these are idealistic, science fiction, and imaginative, and when this is proved and shown in reality, we can say that it is a materialistic thing.

Is it so weird? It's not weird, it's just a cautious approach to idealistic things, not an objection, as long as it's proven, it's shown and observed in reality, this kind of idealism doesn't matter, and as for some idealism that has been proven to be wrong, of course we regard it as idealism for the time being, why temporary? So how can you prove that your proof is correct?

It seems that the talk is more deep, more winding, then don't discuss these, these and other differences are prejudices, are subjective idealistic differences, and human beings themselves think that these distinctions are materialistic, reality has proved that this is not materialistic, this is just the definition of human idealism, it is a kind of prejudice, and it is also a kind of arrogance.

If you say it this way, it's not that human beings don't do anything, it's also an extreme, it can describe the phenomenon for the time being, it can be used temporarily, of course it can be used, why can't it be used, if it is good for human beings, then use it, and if you find a better one, then use a better one, this is also the right way, not to do nothing, you have to find the only truth, then human beings really don't want to live.

Not to mention this, I have also read a lot of books, a lot, I know this kind of thing myself, I don't need to prove anything to others, these books, I can say now, I basically forgot all of them, this is a fact, some may only remember the name of one person, some may remember some plots.

Can I say that it was a waste of time for me to read so many books in the past? I can say that if I were to look at it again, a lot of it would be a little impression, I knew that I had read those books, and if I took them out and read them again, I would be familiar again, I couldn't say that I was wasting time, I wouldn't deny my past, and as for distinguishing whether it was a useless past, I wouldn't comment, because it was my past, and I didn't know what the past had on me now, and I knew that the past at that time had a lot of influence on my past, and then it came to the present.

I can say that I have written so much, except for some of the more useful and influential understandings that I remember, and many other understandings that I cannot remember, and if I don't turn the book, I will not deny my past creation, because it is a gradual process, and it seems to be a continuous process.

;