Look at the current Internet, how developed it is, it can be said that if you have the Internet, you will own the whole world.

In the past, I often heard someone calling, put down my phone and put down the Internet. There are also people who shout that the Internet makes people inert and unrealistically powerful.

It seems that there is so much knowledge and so much information on the Internet, and I must be online every day so that I will not be eliminated by the times. The illusory sense of power comes from the accumulation of all kinds of knowledge, and the little worship of everyone when showing off to others.

I used to scoff at this kind of statement, thinking that it was nothing more than conservative resistance to the Internet. How good is the network, it is convenient to do things, and such new knowledge, doesn't it need to be supplemented in time?

Now it seems that he is nothing more than a puppet. Just like the brain, can you turn off the brain like you turn off the computer?

And it seems that I don't go online for a day, which is a very difficult thing.

Even if you try not to surf the Internet or touch WeChat, then you must have something else to divert, anyway, you just can't do nothing to spend the day.

Even now, if you don't think about the so-called slashing, you will feel that you are wasting your time.

You know, every time you breathe, you lose one less breath in your life.

Isn't this the means by which the "self" survives?

I made up countless things for myself to do, but in fact, there was nothing to do at all. The world is all false, the identity is false, it's just one character.

What else must be done?

It's not a question of what to do, it's a matter of having to get rid of those influences in your mind.

The people and things that occupy my mind, they make me think about them before I do things, think about the effect on them while doing things, and fear the negative impact on them after doing things.

Doing things is no longer about doing things, it's about doing things for a specific goal. Once you can't achieve that goal, emotions such as hesitation, anxiety, fear, etc., will start to pull.

Slash!

These things shouldn't exist in my head, and they're not qualified to manipulate me.

Yes, it's manipulation. I was manipulated by these people and things, and it's no wonder that I can analyze the behavior patterns of certain people. Knowing who and what he is doing is clear, the prediction behavior becomes clear.

Mom, mom, what is it that makes you so important in my mind?

Even now, I still think about you and put you among the important considerations in my choice.

Is it because you raised me? So I have to spend the rest of my life in return?

But, in fact, I spend more time at work than I spend with you at dinner, so why are you so important?

I value money more, why do you still occupy my mind?

People have to compare their hearts to their hearts, and no one forces themselves to be filial to you, but it seems that this is the unspoken rule of the whole society. The unspoken rule that provocation is not allowed, once the bottom line is touched, then it is blame and insults from all over the world.

But I don't care about these insults, but why do I still want to be filial to you, and even afraid to do something to make you uncomfortable.

I often tell myself, "If I do this, my mother will probably break my leg", "No, my mother is still at home, it will make her sad." ”

Why is this happening? How can it have such an influence when it's just a character, it's just a false existence in my mind?

This influence is given by me, but why can't I take it back? I always hold on to this meaning as if it were real.

You gave me life and raised me, is that why I have to repay you?

If so, what's the difference with trading?

Moreover, filial piety to one's parents seems to be self-evident, there is no need to think about it at all, everyone must abide by it. Filial piety is allowed to vary in degree, but it is not permissible to openly denigrate the virtue of filial piety.

Human nature!

It turned out to be human nature, because of the existence of this character, everyone must have something to abide by together. And then elevate this thing infinitely, so that society as a whole cannot provoke it in any way.

It's a struggle, a cover-up. As if filial piety to parents is a matter of course, in this way, we grasp a meaning and identify this thing as true.

So as to inject a lot of effort into their roles and strengthen the fullness of their roles.

and his wife, whether she is a person or a title. Do I have to need a specific woman, or is it just a woman who occupies that title?

If I change to a woman as a wife and still live happily, then what is the previous responsibility?

At the end of the day, I need a woman to take over the title of wife, and it doesn't matter who that woman is. The so-called "love you" and "reluctant to leave you" are just because they are worried that they will not find a suitable one.

If I knew, very surely, that my next woman was better than my current woman in every way, would I still be nostalgic? Or for how long?

The "self" doesn't care about that, it just needs to have a definition, and it doesn't care who occupies that definition. There is a definition that makes the "self" strong and identifies something as real.

This character is plump up again.

All of them are characters, they are all labels called human nature, and they all belong to Yuan Changwen instead of me.

Whether it is filial piety or not, whether it is a wife or not, it is a trade-off based on human nature. But human nature itself is not real, so discussing it yourself is going round and round after all.

Family affection and love seem to be two words that are not allowed to be tarnished. Every time there is a variety of things that challenge the nerves, it will trigger discussions and even abuse among the majority of netizens.

That's not the result of thinking at all, it's the "ego" that wants to defend. Once you start thinking about it, you will inevitably find that these are nothing more than social conventions. Continuing to think about it, as long as you are honest, you simply can't escape the question of who is setting all this.

In the end, all the questions come down to, who am I?

A person who does not surf the Internet has such a narrow thinking and a narrow vision. How much I once agreed with this sentence, because without the Internet, it is equivalent to missing a large part of the channel for information intake.

But is this information and knowledge real?

If you can't even be sure if you're a person or a piece of, what knowledge is there?

After all, it was in the devil's deception, and he was deceived like this for more than twenty years, and he never doubted it. The preaching of those masters, the upgrading of cognition, and the hard work, I believe it so easily.

Why should you be filial to your mother?

It seems like this question can't be asked at all, but why can't it be asked?

Is it because there is no answer, or is it not allowed to ask, or is it because once asked, it destroys the question?

Human nature, these are all things that belong to Yuan Changwen, not mine.

I'm just that stupid background, that awareness, how can I talk about human nature?

The character of Yuan Changwen seems to be prescribed that certain things must be adhered to in order to be allowed to walk on the stage of human nature. But these are all false, and they should not and cannot manipulate me in this way.

I want to take back these influences.