Christ said that we have been expelled from Paradise and need to return to Paradise. It's about "not being afraid of life", and then you can play uncontrollably.

But again, this is just a guess, what if the whole world is deliberately set to run rampant with fear, that is, to be aware of how people can be immobilized in the trivial things of life within the limits of the world's fear.

It's entirely possible, but if you just want to be aware of Paradise, why not just set the world as Paradise? It's all speculation, maybe there is Paradise, maybe there is fear, maybe there is freedom from fear and go to Paradise, who knows?

That awareness is everything, and there is no reason to be aware of only our world. Of course, again, this sentence is still a speculation.

I don't know anything.

The characters are not real, so why should I try to do things to flesh out the characters? Why should I keep a good character and not kill? Yes, the characters are kind, kind, and loving, which makes the other characters feel very comfortable.

But why should I keep these character attributes? If I don't have the opportunity to break these character attributes, then it's not a big problem to still exist, after all, in my mind, these character attributes don't exist at all, but I just don't have the opportunity to do something evil.

Or rather, life flow doesn't require me to do something evil. At this time, in the eyes of other characters, the role of Yuan Changwen is kind, benevolent, and loving. I don't have to keep these character attributes, but alas, I've missed a chance to break them.

Obviously, I only need to poke it out to end the other person's life, but I hesitated for half an hour without making a move. Now that I think about it, the characters are still bound by morality, and they still want to maintain these high-quality character attributes.

On the other hand, these are all fixed numbers, just what I perceive. However, at this moment, this thinking still belongs to the character and is false, and after all, it is just simulating the position of awareness.

I don't even know how to move forward.

When it comes to slashing, it's just the character using his thoughts to destroy the distortion in his mind, and it's the character who is on a suicide mission. It seems to have free will, and it seems that it wants to cultivate to the truth. However, no matter what the character says or does, it is only what he perceives, and it is always false.

In other words, the act of beheading is itself a kind of falsity. So, can this kind of false behavior be cultivated to the truth? What is left of the character after being killed? Without this thinking, who will touch the truth at that time?

If the character wants to break free from the false and come to the truth, and then finds that when he touches the truth, the character of Yuan Changwen no longer exists, then what is going on with all this?

The point is, do you want to continue to kill, or do you take the initiative to write words to stimulate hatred of falsehood?

Movie characters can never break through the light and become movie screens. In other words, no one can cultivate to the truth. Because after cultivating to the truth, there is no such thing as "human", and there are no more characters.

And those characters who preach to the real will always give people a feeling of being on top. No matter which sect it is, it will seem that "I am the one who leads to the real path, you are all still bound by the trivial things of life, you are all scum, and I am the most powerful one." ”

Or, "Wake up, this world is false, we have to pursue the truth, don't be busy in this false life, don't waste our time, we must go to the truth" This kind of compassionate nonsense attitude.

Confused, I'm really, really confused.

Even with so many chapters of slashing, it's still hard for me to imagine what it's like to touch the truth. If you want to know, maybe you have to see it for yourself.

However, this act of slashing characters can be found to be very stupid just by thinking about it. For what? If you just want to live well, then it is enough to "not be afraid of life", as long as you are not afraid, then the whole universe will become your own playground.

So, why keep going? What's so good about that truth? Am I really fed up with falsehood? I've been living in falsehood for so many years, and I haven't realized how uncomfortable I am?

Do I really want to continue to cultivate to the truth?

Why do you have to interact with other people? Who is the other person? Is it a humanoid robot that is set up?

Yuan Changwen was very uncomfortable, as if there was a volcano in his chest waiting to erupt. But it didn't erupt, as if it was always a little bit close to erupting. This has been the case several times, but it just didn't break out, and every time it was suppressed by the so-called sanity.

Damn it!

How I wish I could explode, how I wish I could go crazy and then break through the falsehood in desperation. Even if I ruined my life, ruined my family, well, in fact, I have ruined my own life.

I don't know what happened to the family of the empire, maybe they have already suffered a catastrophe. Of course, maybe it will be better, who knows?

I still have worries, I still have worries, as if I have a wild beast hidden in my heart, and if I don't control it, then the beast will run out and devour myself in an instant.

But how do I know it's a beast?

Now I am the one who is twisted, forcibly changed by the twist in my head. As long as I believe in the distortion in my head, then there is no way to return to the natural state.

Because of the unknown of the innermost impulses, imagining them as beasts inadvertently devalues the inner's impulses. Because it's wild, it's a beast, and the characters claim to be civilized, gentlemanly, elegant, and so on.

The world of civilization is the only world I know about, and those disguises and distortions are the only character attributes I know. Even though it's all a twist in theory, I'm still reluctant to throw away this shit.

Who knows what I'm unleashing?

It's not about believing in the impulses of the heart, it's not about believing in the forces of nature. There was only one reason why I didn't kill, and that was that I believed that the twist in my head outweighed the twist in my hate.

My fear of losing my familiar life, my fear of discarding my familiar distortions, is more powerful than the hatred I have for the twists in my head. So, I chose to believe in the distortion of the mind, which is the so-called kindness, benevolence, and other character attributes.

This statement appears to me to have free will to decide whether to choose fear or hate.

It's really confusing, like a new sect believer, who is preached to be "compassionate", so he is ready to be a good person. But then I heard words like "This world is empty," and I didn't know if I should continue to be a good person.

Whether the character can be killed or not, I don't know. I don't know what the character's next will do.

If the character's words and deeds are fixed, then why should I try to kill them? But this kind of thinking itself is also a certainty.

What am I going to do?