Anyone I know is not the real state of that person, but the person "I think". I made up all kinds of data about the other party, and then put it in my head and declared to the outside world that this is that person.

I don't know anyone, all I know is dummy data in my head.

Isn't that a perception? Isn't it a distortion?

"How can you do that?"

Zhen Nyima is funny, why can't the other party be like this? Who is stipulating that the other party can't do this? Or is the other person's behavior conflicting with the data in their head, so they accuse the other party of changing?

Can you talk a little bit more nonsense? Use data that is itself fictitious to judge the truth of the other party. It's like thinking the sun is cold, and then you find out that the sun is warm, and you blame the sun for something.

How do I know what kind of person the other person is? Even, how do I know that the other person is not a program?

The information in the little head is so humble, how can you judge the words and deeds of the other party, and even ask the other party's words and deeds to be the same as you expect?

Any subsequent action of the other person is possible, and I can't explain everything based on what I know, and I want it to make sense. Because I know nothing but "I exist".

These self-definitions, self-definitions of others, still define ourselves. The so-called world view, the so-called treatment of others, and the so-called high emotional intelligence are all self-defined.

"I think everyone should live in harmony", which is to show that you are a person who loves harmony.

"I think that being a human being should be fun" is expressing himself as a person full of fun.

"I think that life should not be disappointed in time, look at those who play with mobile phones, it's really pitiful", this is just to show that he is a person who works hard and struggles.

Unfortunately, since these things can be added, they can also be killed. Although it seems very difficult to kill self-definition now, but so what, I still move forward slowly after all.

When one has had enough of falsehood, perhaps one will have to start the path of slashing, and of course, it is more likely to continue to endure.

"If you have to endure hardship, you will become a superior person", "A gentleman can not inherit what others can't inherit, and the way of great weapons", what is the difference between these things and the hard work that we are paying attention to now?

What's the point of changing one opinion to another? I've been doing stupid things like this for so many years to keep changing the color and shape of my shit to win the approval of others.

No matter how profound the views are, no matter how awesome the opinions, they are nothing but artificial distortions. Isn't it sad to guess the world with the pitiful information of a little head, and to think that your guess is true?

The outlook on love, the world, and the outlook on life, this Nima is all. A large group of people with similar views ridiculed another group of people and named them as having three views that are not correct. It's all limitations, it's all false, why should I kill them at this level?

Character, character, how long are you going to continue to deceive me? What else did I hold on to and not let go?

It's too much, so much distortion in my head. Various opinions, "no spitting", "no loud noise in public", "customer service staff should have a better attitude", "come first and come first", "apologize if you step on your foot", ......

Oh, my God!

It seems that these are small things, but it is these self-definitions that make up the character of Yuan Changwen, making the character plump, charming and charming.

Even, defining these are self-definitions of small things, which also need to be killed.

There are also so-called all kinds of precautions, which seem to be good for themselves, to avoid losses, or to obtain greater benefits. But it's all a trick of the character, in order to flesh out the character attributes and use fear to refine my self-definition.

Fear of your partner's departure, so prepare in advance, what prenuptial property notarization or something. In case my partner leaves, at least I won't have much to lose.

In order to avoid the marriage going to the graveyard, various rules are imposed, and even after the divorce has been planned beforehand. Isn't "both people having to be financially independent" the best proof of this?

The reason why too many perceptions seem to make sense is that they conform to the self-definition. The character feeds the character, that's all.

I'm just a rude little kid.

Remember the joke about adapting the countries of a certain planet into a class, and certain large countries with different class positions. Is this really a joke? The people who lead the development of the country are almost above the elite of the country. Look at these people, how are they different from the rest of the class?

And I, on the other hand, am a rude little child. What is the essential difference between the so-called family union, the so-called left and right, and the so-called political means, which are the essential differences between children and children saying, "I won't play with you, let's go, let's play others"?

Don't dare to let go, don't dare to let things develop on their own. It's like having a pet, always like to meddle in the life of the pet, and always think that you know what is good for the pet. This is true of all aspects of life, and fear controls me to spin and spin, as if this is the only way to avoid destruction.

"A woman's face is easy to age, and her inner beauty will slowly mellow over time", how did you agree with this kind of discourse in the first place? How many of them do not want to show that they are a superficial person? It is difficult to say that this sentence is wrong, but it is establishing an aesthetic, that is, inner beauty is better than outer beauty.

Isn't that a twist?

What is inner beauty? is it full of kindness, pity, gentleness, kindness, and so on? It's hard to say that these beautiful things are bad, but they're not real, they're all artificially distorted.

They limit me and make me identify with the character's attributes and think that these are real.

Poor me, alone here, simply don't know how to get out of the role.

What else is there to catch?

Yuan Changwen has asked this question countless times, but every time he catches something. I never thought that getting rid of the character would be such a difficult trip, and it would take effort and time to kill a fake thing.

It's funny, how can it be a thing that doesn't exist, how can it firmly bind me? It's really funny, how exaggerated the characters are, so that the false non-existent things are more real than the real ones.

Think about the boundless truth, how long does it take to fully believe in it? Objective things are real, and how many times has this self-definition been killed?

What's going on with all this? Could it be that the character of Yuan Changwen is destined to be deceived so easily? Or does the super VIP who "I exist" want to see this kind of distortion?

I don't know, that feeling of floating uncertainty is coming again.