It's a pity that any literal expression is nonsense, how can it be possible to use words to describe the truth? to use limitations to describe infinity, and to make limitations understand?

The origins of writing are all based on this dualistic world, and are themselves prepared to describe duality.

Labeling kills!

Is that awareness just an awareness?

Well, I can completely replace it with "that awareness". For example, I became aware of these graphic elements, I realized that I was thinking, I realized that I was typing these words.

Can we replace it with "that perception"?

"That awareness"?

"That perception"?

"That experience"?

If "awareness" means the same thing as "awareness," "perception," and "awareness," then why invent these different words?

Even, I can describe it in great detail, "It is to be able to see what the character of Yuan Changwen is seeing, hearing what the character of Yuan Changwen is hearing, and feeling what the character of Yuan Changwen is feeling, and that existence is the only reality." ”

But this kind of complicated description, not only does not have the beauty of the words, but also has the so-called spiritual profundity, like a crappy schoolboy trying to explain the problem, cumbersome.

What is true? The long passage that I have described is the only truth.

Just like the projection of a movie, there will always be a being watching the movie, and there will always be a screen carrying the light of the movie.

But this metaphor also has a problem, can you not go to the movie? Does the screen have to carry the light of the movie?

That's the problem of metaphors, and it's always going to be a problem. Reality is infinite, and there is no character. The idea of not going to the movie means that the moviegoer can do something else, meaning that there is something else besides the screen and the light of the movie.

It's never clear what the real thing is. In other words, it is not possible to explain it very clearly within the scope of our understanding.

It's like a four-dimensional space, who can come up with a model of a four-dimensional space in the three-dimensional space that we are in? It's like taking out an apple in front of me and telling me, this is the four-dimensional space?

I can't do it.

The so-called mathematical model is just an inference of what characteristics the four-dimensional space should have, and what would happen in the three-dimensional space if the four-dimensional space was reduced.

But I've never been able to understand the four-dimensional space as clearly and intuitively as I see an apple.

Creatures in two-dimensional space may be able to understand the situation of three-dimensional figures in two-dimensional space after dimensionality reduction. In other words, what kind of graphic transformation will occur when a three-dimensional figure passes through a two-dimensional plane.

However, a two-dimensional creature can never directly and clearly face a three-dimensional figure, not even an imagination. It's like we can't imagine how two-dimensional creatures survive. We don't know what they eat, what they eat, what they reproduce.

What's more, this is the only truth, a place where there are no characters, a place where there is no distinction. What's the use of saying something like "one is all"?

"I exist" will mislead people into thinking that this real existence has something to do with the character of Yuan Changwen. Also, they mistakenly think that "you exist" or "he exists" or something like that.

"That awareness" is also misleading, and "that perception" and "that awareness" are all misleading caused by labeling. It's as if "awareness" and "perception" are two different things, and "that awareness" seems to be something called "awareness", just like something called "apple".

Where is the truth?

It is in the place where you can hear the question "where is the truth", where you can see the question "where is the truth", and where you can feel that the character of Yuan Changwen is asking the question "Where is the truth".

It's very tongue-twisting, and it looks like it didn't say it.

But it doesn't matter, the world is false, and I'm still being manipulated by fear. That's the key, and that's the next step in my slashing.

It's not about describing the truth, it's not about making others better understand what is true, it's about seeing the fear spreading in your body and cutting it down with your own hands.

I'm still thinking that it's a good thing to go on a trip, and that being alone in the mountains might help to kill.

Shit!

What's the use of these? It's nothing more than enriching the characters, it's nothing more than making all kinds of excuses, such as not having to meet all kinds of people in the mountains, and not having to deal with all kinds of things. And where does this judgment come from?

A twist in the head!

Slashing, this moment is the best, this place is the best location.

I'm still thinking about finding myself on a trip, bullshit, I don't have a self at all, what else am I looking for?

Everything I thought was my own and needed to be killed. What you think you can't happen, you need to be killed.

Truth, it doesn't exist in this world, I can't find the truth. The only thing that can be done is to kill these falsehoods and stop believing that these things are real.

What am I still hesitating about? Why don't I just jump off a cliff? What are I still grabbing? Is it so difficult to discard these falsehoods?

I also want to defend myself, I want to promote my theories, and I want everyone to know that I am a person who seeks truth.

Shit!

These are nothing more than the attributes of the character, nothing more than the aura that hangs over the character. As long as the character is real, he will do everything he can to try to solidify the character.

From the occurrence of various things, Yuan Changwen's role is constantly consolidated. Every moment of his choice is based on the distortion in his mind, and he wants to keep enriching the role of Yuan Changwen.

"I've always been ......," or, "I've never been ......."

Do you still hear little of this kind of declaration?

Isn't this just introducing yourself, or chatting with others, constantly consolidating the existence of Yuan Changwen's character and its character attributes?

I don't dare to live according to the heartbeat, because many heartbeats are contrary to the character attributes I set. And those set character attributes are completely shaped by the propaganda of the entire empire.

It seems that the fear of future failure, the fear that after living according to the heartbeat, it will be worse than the present and lead to the collapse of life. But in fact, he is afraid of the collapse of his own character, and he is afraid that the character attributes he has set will be destroyed.

Further, it is the fear that "there is no character".

Without me, why should I maintain the role of Yuan Changwen all the time? Or in other words, maintain the perception of the role of Yuan Changwen in the hearts of others?

Strictly speaking, it is such a virtual data that maintains the image of Yuan Changwen's character in his own mind, "how do I think others will perceive it".

Shit.