"You know again?"

Yuan Changwen muttered to himself, this rhetorical question seemed to be a pointer, constantly flashing to remind that he was still self-righteous "knowing".

All of them are just the picture elements that are perceived at the moment, but the self-righteous connection makes the whole picture element look alive. There is time and space, there is the past and the future, there is the whole universe and people of all kinds of ideologies.

Why do I want to relate to it? Why do I think something is self-righteous? Do I perceive that the relevant elements of yesterday mean that everything that happened yesterday is real?

I'm alone, falling in the depths of the lake, so what reason do I have to think that I really have a pet in the Empire, and why do I think I have a pet and think about it with the idea that I am a person with a pet?

None of this is real, pets, families, empires, the universe, etc., when I think about these false things, I am already in the midst of falsehood. No matter how amazing, how remarkable, or prescient these ideas may be, they are all false.

I consider myself a man with a wife, so when faced with some temptations, I think of responsibility and my wife and children at home. But how do I know I'm a man with a wife and children, and why didn't I just believe those elements without verifying it?

Of course, maybe after what is presumptuous, after doing things with the impulse of the heart, it will lead to a series of family disharmony, quarrels and fights, and even the separation of wives. But this argument only shows that one's behavior is manipulated by fear, and it is not convincing at all.

Isn't it good to act according to fear? Isn't it okay to be afraid of being burned by the flames, so you don't touch the flames. Fearing the breakup of the family, so I do my best to maintain the family.

Is that wrong? Of course not, it's just not true.

The question seems to have been entangled all along, and the sages of the past have put forward their own views, some of which are similar and some of which are far from each other. But it is undeniable that most of the views of these sages were limited by the times.

Live how you want, and any rest of the discussion is based on fear. The source of fear is the distortion in the mind. The content of fear is difficult to refute, it is always full of reasons and possibilities, otherwise how can I be afraid.

For example, should life be lived in peace, or should you experience a different life without inhibition?

This kind of discussion is pointless, and anyone who tries to convince others is someone who is manipulated by fear and does not know it. There is truth to this statement, and there is truth to that statement, in order to keep the character's self-definition from being destroyed, to prove that he is right, to make sure that his choice is correct, he will try to convince others.

It seems that as long as more people stand on their side, the more their words and deeds will represent the truth.

When your choice comes from a whim, it's hard to argue with others. Because I don't know why I chose this way, let alone what the benefits of this choice are, I haven't done a survey and I don't have data to support it, I'm just excited.

In this case, how do you argue with others? How do you convince others? and even the next moment, the distortion in your mind begins to deny and pound. Moreover, this negation is quite valid, and its content is quite plausible. After all, the thrill lies in the unknown.

Is this method of believing in the thrill of the heart good? Is it correct?

I don't know, but I just can't believe that after the distortion in my head, there must be something as a source of choice. After all, characters are always fake, so what difference does it make if they think about what they say or do, or how they make their choices?

It's funny to think about, who would argue about?

Do you have to at seven o'clock in the morning, or do you have to at half past seven? Who would be involved in this kind of argument? And who would give an example of how to poop at eight o'clock every day to be healthy?

When should you in life? The answer is most like, it doesn't matter, there is no fixed number, when you want to do, look at yourself, when you feel it...... Right, it's exactly this kind of answer that doesn't have a definite number.

So why does everything else have to be fixed? It's as if before I was born, I should have set all sorts of guidelines for how I should spend my life. But doesn't this certainty itself become a shackle?

Even if you have to travel around the world in your life, what about people who don't like to travel, who can smile all day looking at potted plants in their bedrooms, and who like to sit and sit in a daze?

The influence of the times, the limitations of the times, the ideas that seem to be contrary to the mainstream of society, and the ideas that are different from those of parents and elders are the right truth, which is the so-called "should".

No one likes to be controlled, but they always like to be in control.

It was the "should" in my head that gave me the urge to take control. When things don't happen the way I think they should be, I feel very wrong and uncomfortable.

How do I know how things are supposed to happen? That mind, again, is just a visual element of awareness, on the same level as things. So, what reason is there to think that the "event" screen element of the same level must be carried out according to the "thinking" screen element?

All of these are the elements of the picture that are perceived at this moment, and none of them are real. So, why is it that I am always on the side of my own thinking? being controlled by the distortion in my head without knowing it, and then saying out loud that I hate being controlled.

It's like those who shout out to change their fate, but never think about changing gender, discarding the twists in their minds, and so on. I just want to change my life environment, I just want to have more money or stand at the top of my life.

Is this fate? Isn't gender part of fate? Isn't the idea in the head part of fate?

If you want money, just say it, and if you are afraid of being poor, just say it. Right, this can also know the goal more clearly, so that you can work towards the goal more clearly.

When my pet is out of view. Am I just like I don't have a pet? No, it's a black and white trap. The presence of pets should not be an obstacle to heartbeat. Whether you think you have a pet or don't have a pet, when the excitement comes, there should be no obstacles.

Yuan Changwen is a little confused, the role is fake, what's not to do? This role is an obstacle, this role is not an obstacle, is there anything wrong with all this?

And, is a slash a must?

Nothing is a must, and the phrase itself becomes a "must".

So, there will always be a "must"?