Yuan Changwen fell quietly, the temperature of the lake was changing, the depth of the lake was changing, and everything seemed to be changing.

I don't know what else I'm going to do, and I don't know what I'm in. What the hell is going on here, the so-called slashing, the so-called real, what the hell are these things?

And those words that you can't understand, how did you understand them?

A wave of gloom enveloped Yuan Changwen, but he wanted to cry but couldn't cry, and he didn't even know why he wanted to cry. Of course, I don't want to know.

What do you know?

Since all knowledge is nothing but a distortion in the mind, why spend a lifetime pursuing any knowledge? This well-planned dream is definitely not used like this.

But on the other hand, if everybody is in the moment, if everybody is not afraid, then the world will seem a little monotonous. The so-called "man is the spirit of all things" is not at all what civilization and wisdom everyone understands, perhaps simply because it can be shrouded in fear.

Because of the control of the bewitching woman who feared it, there was such a colorful world, so there were so many collisions of ideas. Will life among animals be as colorful as humans, will humans be so miserable, will humans be so distorted?

Yuan Changwen didn't know why he was thinking about these things, as if these sentences were running into his mind by himself, and then he just moved them out of his mind.

What does it have to do with me, and what reason is there to think that these things are self-conceived?

Control, I still want to control.

The role of Yuan Changwen has nothing to do with me, and the thinking of Yuan Changwen's character is also not something I can control. It's just that it looks like I can control my mind, it's just how it looks.

I realized that I was thinking about the apple falling to the ground, and the memory in my head that I was thinking about apples. Is it possible to correlate and claim that you can control your mind?

It's all the content of the picture that is perceived at the moment, and there is no reason to make a connection, although the connection is very reasonable.

The two perceived elements of the picture are that I am thinking about the apple at the moment, and the other is the memory of me thinking about the apple that I am about to think about. So, it seems that I go through the thinking patterns of "I'm going to think about apples" to "I'm thinking about apples".

Explain that I can control my thinking. I was thinking about apples just now, and now I'm thinking about apples, isn't that the best evidence of controlled thinking?

That's how stupid I became.

This seemingly plausible correlation is also very easy to understand and allows humans to live more conveniently in this false world. It seems that time has no secrets in front of him, as if he has mastered everything except for the long river of time.

Correlation is a kind of speculation, that is, to want to explain, that is, to combine the fragmented elements of the picture into an intelligible film. It's not, it's just a picture element.

I've been doing this all the time, and that's why I'm scared by a single word, and I always don't feel right about that fear.

I'm still thinking about how to deal with fear, and I'm still thinking that I can control the thinking of Yuan Changwen's character, so I can get rid of fear by thinking. In other words, you can find a way to cope with your fear by thinking.

And in this way, I have already regarded myself as the character of Yuan Changwen, and I already think that my thinking is my own and can be controlled. Of course, all the above thoughts also belong to the role of Yuan Changwen.

The world is not real, and it is impossible for the mind to touch the truth. And the truth cannot be manifested in this false world. This is a fundamental contradiction, because the person who pursues the truth is not real himself, so he can still only use falsehood to kill falsehood.

But how can the part of the falsehood be killed?

I do not know.

The point is not to kill all falsehoods, because this is simply not possible. The existence of the character of Yuan Changwen is itself a kind of falsehood. This kind of falsehood cannot be killed under any circumstances, unless he physically commits suicide.

And what I want to achieve is obviously to touch the truth while the body is alive.

So, there will definitely be falsehoods that cannot be killed.

Perhaps, the key point is whether you still take the false as the truth. That compulsion that doesn't allow you to have something, that tension that gets entangled in your heart once you give birth to something, that kind of thing that rants out loud "how can you be like this".

I used to think it was very funny, after all, I wasn't even afraid of death, but I was worried about things like I didn't have money. But in fact, "I don't have money" is also one of the character's self-definitions, and the dissipation of these self-definitions is equivalent to the character's death.

So, when I slash at these self-definitions, the tension is no less than thinking about death. are all self-definitions of roles, and these views on things are the basic elements that constitute the role of Yuan Changwen.

"I must have money", this self-definition supports many other self-definitions, and it is also a very important self-definition of Yuan Changwen's role. So, to kill these self-definitions is to make the character die.

These self-definitions are all equivalent, and some may be more deeply solid, some of which may be indifferent. But it is also a self-definition, and there is no such thing as "not afraid of death" that is much more advanced or profound than the self-definition of "I must be rich".

Death, on the other hand, already contains other self-definitions. If you think about the death of a character, then other self-definitions naturally cannot exist. And I didn't do it, I wasn't afraid of death and I didn't uproot other self-definitions.

Perhaps, this is the inconvenience of labeling.

Every time I talk about not being afraid of death, embracing death, and looking forward to reuniting with the Grim Reaper, I always focus on the label of "death". Rather than deeply feeling what the label is trying to express, as if it is enough to always talk about the word "death".

Labelling words like "everything" and "all" can mislead people to focus on the label rather than delve into what is inside the label. What's everything? What's everything?

When you list everything you say, you will find too many things that you haven't thought about at all. Perhaps, it is precisely for this reason that I seem to have killed the self-definition of "fear of death", but in fact, the other self-definitions of the connotation are still alive and well.

There's still a long way to go. ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: