Always talking about what Yuan Changwen's role has nothing to do with me, but in fact, it's just lip service.

Did it really happen?

After all, it's just an imitation of that awareness, how can it be irrelevant?

If it really has nothing to do with it, then why bother killing here, and why bother with the progress of the killing?

On the other hand, these thoughts are not controllable, but just appear in the picture that they are aware of. But can this kind of thinking help to kill, or can you stand in that position of awareness?

There are no people and things outside, everything is inside.

There is no other feeling for this statement. It seems that this is an ordinary sentence, if you don't remember that this sentence brought a little trance, you can't believe that this sentence is so powerful.

However, isn't it a little too weak to want to make a breakthrough through those words that once brought a different feeling? Because you can't find a way forward, you're going to fry leftovers?

So, if this continues, will you keep going around? and then become dishonest, claiming that this spinning is a step forward, and no one is allowed to challenge your authority?

So, start paying attention to the so-called qualifications?

Funny, is there anything to show off and respect for a person who hasn't graduated from a driving school for 20 years? Or is it a very important qualification that can overpower many other things?

I don't take all the people and things in it, I still think that there is a character named Yuan Changwen walking in this world, and there are many uncontrolled people and things around him.

But in fact, that awareness is everything.

"I don't want anything", this sentence sounds great, so do I want "I don't want anything"? I don't want money or status, I want "I want nothing".

Or rather, "wanting nothing" is itself a want.

The paradox is that the character always thinks that there must be some rules, that he must know his actions in advance. And if you follow the flow of life, how do you know what kind of choice it will be. Maybe today is a good person, tomorrow is a bad person. Maybe today it will be environmentally friendly, and tomorrow it will set fire to the mountains.

All of this is possible.

Moreover, it is misleading to think about these questions. Because I'm not trying to make life better, or to make the character lighter or more glamorous. To kill is to kill falsehood, or to kill the attachment to thinking that "such a thing cannot be born".

Well, discussing the character's behavior doesn't help with the killing.

Exactly what is true is the key point.

The character's behavior is only a visual element that is perceived at the moment, and changing the character's behavior is just a transition from one side of the binary opposition to the other, what does it have to do with slashing?

It's just like the so-called cognitive upgrade, but it's just the same thing. If cognitive upgrading is really possible, then the end result must be to discard all cognition. Only in this way can we break out of the binary opposition.

It doesn't matter how the character acts or thinks, the key is real, real!

Yuan Changwen has never appeared, and this so-called truth is so troublesome. And those falsehoods are also hiding at the moment, and there is no trace at all.

There is a misunderstanding, that is, to kill falsehood. I used to think that falsehood is falsehood, and when I wanted to kill falsehood, I had already identified falsehood as true. Therefore, once the time is removed, the act of killing the false itself becomes.

But the crux of the matter is that I've identified those false ones as true. It's not because I kill those falsehoods that I identify those falsehoods as true. It's that I've identified those falsehoods as true, so I'm going to kill the things that I think are real but are actually false.

Strictly speaking, it's not about killing falsehood, it's about killing the emotion of "I take falsehood as truth." This is the limitation of words, "killing falsehood" is easy to listen to and remember, and it is easy to understand, and of course it is better to promote. And wouldn't it be too troublesome to emphasize the emotion of "I take falsehood as truth" every time?

Perhaps, it is because of this that human civilization has developed a large number of words to refer to certain descriptive words that are too long. For example, the term black hole is a complete replacement for "a celestial body whose space-time curvature is so great that light cannot escape from its event horizon"

However, it is also very misleading, like killing falsehood.

Also, once the time is removed, it is true that slashing can be used as. But did I remove the time? Am I already in the state of removing the time? Obviously, I don't. Because it's in the state of removal time, then it is estimated that it has already been completed.

At least, they won't continue to grasp anything, and they won't be frightened by a word. And when I'm not in the state of removing time, but I say that I should behave in the state of removing time, then I am just evading the killing.

Or rather, to be a character that can be flaunted with this.

Yuan Changwen didn't know how to continue, and he didn't know what he should do. The anger before, the fear before, the burning state before, the ease and ease like the gods before, these are gone.

And in the face of the removal time, I can't continue to believe in the previous things. As a result, I can't continue to use the previous way to kill and move forward, after all, how do I know that what I did before did work?

Having tried, there is no outside society, and this phrase does not cause any different feelings.

But that awareness is everything. In this respect, there is no outside person or thing at all, and there is no real entity corresponding to anything that is perceived.

I'll never know what something really looks like, because it's not real at all, and all the images are just the elements that I perceive at the moment.

Society is very realistic? This is just a distorted answer in the mind, what is worth proclaiming and what is worth grasping? There is no society, let alone an attribute such as whether society is realistic or not. All of them are just twists in the brain.

Those views and those views are all made of thinking. It is in itself absurd to make unwarranted associations of perceived images and to claim certain perceptions and concepts.

Yes, I do see a so-called society at this moment. But these are only the visual elements that are perceived at the moment, and there is nothing worth analyzing and discussing. Once the time is removed, how can it be analyzed and discussed?

I always seem to like to play with my own brain, and when I perceive an element of a picture, I always like to analyze it according to the distortions in my head. And firmly grasp certain distortions, asserting what properties a certain picture element has.

For example, when I became aware of a car accident, the distortion in my mind began to work, and the distinction between who was right and who was wrong was only a low-level discernment. How can you say that there was this car before the car accident? There were these people before the car accident?

Like Mario is moving, but is there really a path to the Great Demon for Mario to move on?Is there really an extension of the road off the screen?()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: