Kindness has always held a place in my heart.

Even though I know that kindness is not real, it is just a distortion of man. Moreover, I also know that the reason why kindness occupies an important position is because I am afraid of the harm caused to me by the unkindness of others, and on the other hand, because of the large number of people who agree with kindness.

However, there is still no killing kindness, and the idea that kindness must be good has always lingered in my mind.

It's not the kindness I choose, but the compulsion of kindness, the distortion of my head.

In other words, it's just that the picture elements present these contents, presenting "I am pulled by kindness".

There's no reason, there's no regret, it's just that. Even if the other party seeks revenge on me, that's all. The twist in my head kept trying to make up stories, but now the twists in my head didn't seem to be able to make up any stories to fear me.

On the contrary, I was disgusted with the twists in my head and the stories that were made up. I even feel that the distortion in my mind is too narrow, and even if I make up a story, it is only limited to a small scope. There's nothing new in the story, it's just a cover of fear.

Who's going to kill the good?

None of this is real, no matter what the elements of the picture present, it is not real. There is no need to delve into it, there is no need to discuss it, what is not true is not real. What else is there to talk about, this is the only truth, since it is not true, then there is no need to say anything more.

Regret is just a idea, because I can't be sure if the things in my memory have happened, and what to talk about. Also, regret is also due to reluctance to the consequences, but how do I know what the consequences will be

Even, when something seems intuitive, how can I be sure that the consequence is really related to the previous behavior?

It sounds sophistry, but it's unreasonable. However, this is reasoning, not being pulled by emotions.

I don't know what the consequences are, but I don't use the word "consequences" at all. It was just a word that was invented under the shadow of fear. When there is no fear, it just happens.

Even if it seems to be very causal, it is only a presentation of the elements of the picture, just a presentation. It doesn't mean anything, it doesn't mean anything, it's just presented as such.

The point is that it's not that you don't regret it, but that it doesn't matter if you regret it.

It's easy to get caught up in the "good" side and think that regret is not good, so you force yourself not to regret it. There is no such distinction between good and bad, and it doesn't matter if you regret it, because it's not true. Even, there is no problem in forcibly separating the good from the bad.

It's like the theater watcher mode, just watching.

None of this is real, the whole world and the characters are not real, and there is no need to criticize it. Everyone is false, and any words and deeds are just personal preferences. Judging by your own personal preferences, isn't it a bit nonsense?

Even, even if you have to judge, there is nothing wrong with it.

The empire will not allow this kind of argument, society needs to be stable, and everyone must have a goal to pursue. Instead of everything, it doesn't matter if the merchant is fireproof.

It's all false anyway, and it doesn't matter whatever. Whether the character is doing well Yuan Changwen suddenly felt that this question itself was a bit nonsense, whether the evaluation of how to live well came from the heart or from other people's standards

At least have a house, a car, a stable job, and a harmonious family, which is called a good life, if not, it is a bad life, even if the person concerned thinks that he is doing well, it will be considered a forced smile

It's here again

Yuan Changwen found that he began to want to preach again, what to do if others feel irritable in their hearts, and how to deal with other people's inner feelings that life is not good

Does this stuff have anything to do with me, I don't feel bad, so why bother discussing some kind of hypothetical situation, how do I know?

Someone else's logic, "I'm not doing well because I don't have enough money." If I make more money, I'll be doing well" and so on, why should I refute it. Right, it makes sense, it doesn't have a penny to do with me.

I don't need to forcibly reverse someone, because it's useless. I don't need to blame each other, because there is no right or wrong. It has nothing to do with me how other people live, and the part used to judge whether things are good or bad has been hacked to death by me.

There's no need to correct anything, because it's all just a representation of the elements of the picture. I don't know if there will be times when I need to correct it, but I don't have the slightest impulse to change others, to make others recognize me, approve of me, and worship me.

It's a very distressing thing to deal with the distortions in my head, I don't have the slightest interest in my own distortions, and as for other people's distortions, they are not distortions, they are just backgrounds. Like an NPC, it is very real and characterful, standing on one side of the binary opposite.

That's all, there is no right or wrong, and there is no level of high or low. Maybe something will be sought after by the character, and it will be selected as high-level, but it is still just fake.

Using other people's standards to put your own life on the table, you will always feel that something is wrong. And that's how emotions and fear make me grasp my self-definition and ignore the little things that are wrong.

It's all false, it's not true, why use other people's standardsSince everything in your mind is distorted, why don't you make one up yourself, or rather, my words and deeds are my truth, my standards.

It's just that the influence of society is huge, and the fear is incredibly powerful. Don't look for standards, but your own paradigm is the standard. Some words can easily sound different, as if something clogged has been turned on.

For example, living a life according to one's own ideas is success, etc., it is difficult to refute from the content, just like the opposite of this sentence, it also makes sense. And the sudden enlightenment or the feeling of "ding" is just a conflict caused by the negative content, which causes the distortion in the brain to suddenly empty for a while.

Then, you will discard the distortion in your head and replace it with another one. After a long period of time, these distortions will be collided with other opposite distortions, and the cycle will produce a sudden feeling of enlightenment.

It's called reading more.

Or, in order to keep the twist in your head, start waving flags for one side and expressing disdain for the other. Emotions can be a great way to make it seem natural and normal.

Yuan Changwen knew that he had to be cautious, walking on thin ice, and if he was not careful, he would stand on one side of the duality.

Something that isn't real will always find a lot of ways to pretend to be real, or that's how the elements of the picture are presented. There is no reason, no reason, and it is presented in this way that I believe that there is something false.

I couldn't do anything about it, I gave up and just did it.

https:bikan383831222247617ht