I don't have a choice, because as an omniscient being, I must have known the end of the matter at the very beginning of the matter. Everything, everything, everything is all at the same time.

And I, on the other hand, can only experience it for a moment. Just like watching a movie, from the beginning to the end, it seems that time passes linearly, but in fact, everything in the movie happens at the same time and has already ended.

I went through a moment, from left to right, from the beginning to the present, because I didn't know how the future would develop, so it created the illusion that I had free will. In fact, I don't even have the will, because it's all over.

The character just seems to have the will, can think and struggle, and seems to just need to work harder to choose another option more courageously. But in fact, the future is already determined, everything is over, and then I perceive that the thinking of the role is as fixed as a program.

It's like the main character of the movie, his thinking has been determined, but I don't know how the future will develop, so it seems that the character's thinking is interesting.

So, is my killing set? Of course, but I don't know if I'm going to continue to kill in the future, or if I'm going to give up and return to the Empire. This kind of ignorance is the fun, and it is one of the reasons why "super VIP" still appreciates it.

No, all I know for sure is "the moment", and the past and future are just imaginations in my head. And the so-called simultaneous existence of time is based on the real existence of objective things, so there is also a problem, is that right?

First of all, all thinking is certain, and there is no such thing as accidentality. Because all thinking is based on the memory in the brain, and these cognitions, knowledge reserves, thinking patterns, and a series of other things are fixed.

It seems that the human brain is not like a computer, searching for data and processing data to draw conclusions. But in fact, the so-called trade-off of the human brain is still a little bit of something in the brain, and if the same people have the same environment, then there will inevitably be the same result. The reason why there is the illusion of free will is simply because it is not omniscient and omnipotent.

Since my thinking is certain, is the development of objective things also certain? No matter how people choose, how they influence, how they affect each other, how they do the butterfly effect, how they are chaotic theories, all these things are caused by the inability to be omniscient and omnipotent.

But there is also an assumption that "objective things really exist and develop according to certain laws", and only in this way can an omniscient and omnipotent being know everything. Of course, "no regularity" can also be seen as a pattern in itself.

So, it's all just speculation, and I don't know if time is solid or liquid, or if the theory that time exists at the same time is also just a hypothesis. The only thing I know for sure is this moment. Well, whether time exists, I don't know at all.

If I could only know the moment, then the word "time" itself would be meaningless. There's no time, it's all right now. I remember remembering yesterday and just now, but these are just memories, how do I know that my memories are real?

Or rather, how do I know where these memories come from?

Time is just a term invented to explain all this, and in order to make my memory seem very reasonable, I pretend that there is such a thing as time, so I explain it all perfectly.

In other words, it is all to deny the fact that "I don't know", whether it is the statement that time has passed, or the statement that time exists at the same time, it is to reject the state of "uncertainty".

The same kind of twist.

I used to believe in the idea that time passes, and yesterday and today, time passes like a stream. I can't go back in time, and I can't look into the future. Then, I believe that time exists at the same time, and if you can know everything, then you must know the past and the future, so time exists at the same time, and the past and future are fixed like a movie.

It's easy to believe me. Because this kind of simultaneous existence is itself a denial of the existence of time. But it is also a speculation, an explanation of the status quo. And I also assume that "objective things develop in a certain direction", but it has already been developed, and I have only experienced it from scratch.

It's like reading a progress bar.

Any explanation is a guess, and what I have to do now is to clear my mind of those baseless affirmations.

If we don't even know whether objective things really exist, then any explanation of the operation and development of objective things seems meaningless. I only know that at this moment, then the explanation of time also seems redundant.

I don't know, that's the answer.

Depend on!

The idea that time exists at the same time implies another assumption, which is the continuity of my memories. This assumption is equivalent to saying that the past was real, all the way to the present.

The same metaphor can be used as a movie, although the protagonist does not know the future development and does not know that the whole film is over, but the protagonist will always follow the storyline.

So, how do I know that my memory is real? How do I know that what I thought was the past was really the past? Maybe in the last minute, I was Zhang Changwen and then died. I was Luo Changwen in the last second, and then I also died. Now I am the character of Yuan Changwen, with a complete memory and a reasonable world.

But can these show that the role of Yuan Changwen has always existed?

The simultaneous existence of time implies that I have always been the character of Yuan Changwen, but how do I know this? Of course, if I were to refer to "I exist", the term that time exists at the same time would seem redundant.

"I exist" is aware of the role of Yuan Changwen and is aware of it at this moment. So before, how do I know if "I exist" was aware of Zhang Changwen's character? I don't even know if "I exist" will be aware of multiple roles at the same time.

Therefore, the statement that time exists at the same time implies the assumption that "the role of Yuan Changwen has always existed", which is an unfounded affirmation. After all, how do I know I've been alive all along.

I only know that at this moment, "I exist" is aware of the role of Yuan Changwen.

The rest, all of which are explanations for this state of affairs, are unnecessary and superfluous. Why explain? Why does it have to make sense? The character wants to distort the world, but in fact, "I exist" is the only reality, and that awareness is everything.

What am I doing?

Yuan Changwen suddenly realized that what the hell was he thinking about? Since I have nothing to do with the character of Yuan Changwen, why should I care about everything about him? Why do I care about this world?

How much does it matter if the character is dead or alive, whether he is good or bad? Good or bad, good or evil, why should I care about this? Rich or not, murder and arson, kindness and kindness, it's my business.