There is no such thing as love.

Just like the character of Yuan Changwen does not exist, this tree does not exist, and this lake also does not exist. Everything that is "unconscious" is false, and falsehood does not exist, so these things do not exist.

Once time is removed, it can be seen that the so-called "love" is something built on countless assumptions.

Suppose that time passes linearly, suppose that the perceived element of the picture called "lover" is a real person, and suppose that the memory in the brain is correct.

It is only on the basis of these assumptions that the issues related to love can be discussed.

If you are only aware of that kind of heartbeat at this moment, why do you look for the process of pursuing yourself in your memory, or you have vowed to become the other person's lover or something when you are not aware of this heartbeat?

Once the time is removed, then the visual elements that are perceived at this moment are everything to themselves. I can't be sure that the memories in my head are correct, so why should I choose to act in the present moment according to the past in my head about our sweet memories?

For example, at the moment, I obviously don't want to deal with the other party. But because the memories in my head show that the other person has done something touching for me, or remembers that we once vowed to hug each other no matter what. Therefore, I believe that the memory in my head is contrary to the obvious "I don't want to deal with it" at the moment, and chooses "what a lover should do".

In the same way, at this moment, I am aware of my own heartbeat, why should I believe the memories in my head and weigh the so-called personality, family and other shit? Yes, the importance of character, the importance of appearance, the importance of intelligence, knowledge, conversation, etc., are all distorted trade-offs in the mind.

It's all a piece of shit.

By the time I knew why I had fallen in love with you, I had fallen into a lie of fear blending, had been deceived by assumptions, had believed the twist in my head. And this, in itself, is the basis for future quarrels.

Because, what I know, what I think, is just virtual data in my head. The other person I know is only the other person I know in my head, but is this what the other person really looks like? Whether the other person is a real person or a program, I can't fully understand the other person.

So, I'm just in love with you in my head, does it have anything to do with the real you? When I pursue you in reality, I have begun to confuse the virtual data in my head with the real you, how can this situation not be contradictory?

The virtual data in my head is incomplete after all, and I can only fall in love with you in my head, so when we come into contact, what else can we find except that the virtual data in my brain is changing?

Yuan Changwen shook his head, who would believe this statement? Who would approve of this set of rhetoric? The characters who would approve of it didn't need to see my set of rhetoric at all, and the characters who didn't approve of it would only forget it after seeing it. So, what's the point of writing it?

It seems that the characters will learn something and gain some insights by reading books. But this is all predestined, when the character needs to change, something happens to appear, and even without these things, the character will get the change in other ways.

Everything is a certainty, and if the linear passage of time is admitted, then there is no such thing as arrogance at all. Of course, perhaps this kind of pride is itself a certainty.

Yuan Changwen found that if a character believes in this set of rhetoric, then he will inevitably face the collapse of responsibility. Because the so-called responsibility is a distortion in the mind, a transaction based on the linear passage of time.

It's all a product of fear, and if you look closely, you will see that there is fear everywhere. Even the emergence of many words is a product of fear. For example, responsibility, dreams, courage, rules, reality, the pinnacle of life, hard work, struggle, and disappointment......

If you act exactly according to the heartbeat that you are aware of at this moment, you will inevitably face an old husband and wife, but suddenly realize that you are in love with another person. Or, suddenly, you realize that you want to live alone, etc., too many situations. And at this time, following the heartbeat of awareness, then this relationship will inevitably be abandoned.

Because, how do I know that the memory in my head is correct, how do I know that time passes linearly, how do I know that the other person is a real person and not a program?

What if I was the only one in the world and the rest was a program that I orchestrated? When I was eating, the other person would say, "I know you're eating," but how would I know that the other person really knew?

Perhaps, what kind of avenue is ruthless or something, that's the state.

Even, this reflection at this moment is not me, it is just a visual element that I am aware of. It looks like I'm controlling the mind, but there's nothing to justify the act of control.

Because the reason why I think I'm in control of this mind is that I remember what I was thinking about and then realize what I was thinking about at the moment. So, I claim that I'm controlling this thinking, isn't it a bit too much?

For example, I feel like I'm thinking about apples, and the memory in my head is, "A few seconds ago, I wanted to think about apples." That's all, if you claim that the memory in your head is correct, and that time passes linearly, then of course you will deduce that I am in control of this thought.

But again, the assumptions of the problem need to be carefully considered. I have absolutely no reason to think about a problem on the basis of an untested hypothesis.

It must be emphasized that this does not help in any way in life and does not make a glamorous, charismatic, rich character. Cultivating to the truth will only destroy life, and if all this is false, then who will live well?

In other words, who will live according to the twists in their heads?

And most of the characters throughout the empire believe in the twist in their heads, and in their opinion, my behavior can only be described as weird. This is still a situation where my words and deeds have not affected others, and if I pull up a bunch of disciples, the Führer will definitely not tolerate me in this state.

The whole scene completely became, and I felt that there was a body in the picture, a scenery in the picture, and a mind in the picture. Even though the characters in the frame were talking to me and talking to me, I had no idea who they were talking to, or if they were actually talking.

Even, there is no "I" aware of it at all, and the description of "that awareness" may be more appropriate.

Language is always based on duality, and it is simply too difficult to describe a state without a subject and an object. But it doesn't matter, because there is no need to explain "real" at all, and "unreal" does not need to be explained.

Everything is "unreal". Including this sentence.