When he stops identifying with the role of Yuan Changwen, what else is necessary?

It's not just the so-called morality, it's not just the pursuit of career money, and there are some small details that I never care about. For example, about something that you would get hurt.

Here's the problem, if I didn't know anything, then I wouldn't know that reaching out and touching the flame would get burned. In that case, why should I hold on to the idea that "touching the flame will hurt" and then not touch the flame?

Touching the flame hurts, that's what I've learned from experience. But that doesn't mean that the next time you touch the flames, you'll hurt just as much. Any speculation about the consequences of touching a flame before touching it is a guess.

But why didn't I touch the flames? If my answer was that I didn't want to get hurt, then I accepted the guess that touching the flames would hurt. And, take that guess as something that will happen for sure.

However, the belief that drove me not to touch the flames, and even to be very careful with them, was the guess that touching the flames would hurt. Who is going to say that touching the flame does not hurt, then let him try?

The point is, I can't identify it as something I don't know, is it just unsolvable?

I can say that I couldn't be sure that there was flame, or that I was just aware of the injury. But this does not solve the driving force of "touching the flame will hurt".

Again, the topic of physical injuries is different from mental injuries. Those so-called self-esteem are nothing more than meaningless distortions, but physical injuries are not in the scope of discussion...... Is it?

If I skip it, then I'm declaring that in addition to "I exist", I also know that "touching a flame hurts". Of course, this is just a guess, but deep down I take it as a reality and deeply believe in life.

Damn it!

Totally stuck!

originally thought that he had seen through it, but he only needed to wait for time and gradually disagree with the role of Yuan Changwen. Unexpectedly, it was like this again, and when I was self-righteous, I found that it was a trap at all. But fortunately, at least the problem can be found.

If there is no problem, but it is not done, then it is embarrassing. At that time, it can only be said that he is no longer dishonest, and he is no longer willing to continue to kill, let alone use a knife to cut himself.

This question was once absolutely asked, but now there is no answer to it, let alone destroying it. It's always been like this, the same problem has to be slashed several times before it can be completely eliminated.

So, how do I know that touching a flame hurts? I don't know, but why do I think I know it all the time? And even if I saw that, I couldn't keep myself in a state of "I don't know if it hurt if I touched a flame?"

If the so-called flow of life requires itself to touch the flames, to itself to be injured, then would I do it?

Ha!

The question is whether or not I believe that "touching a flame hurts", and I wouldn't be surprised if one day I found out that touching a flame doesn't hurt because I don't believe in that myself.

In addition, any action taken by the character, even if it is sitting still, can be interpreted as believing something. The character's actions are fake, so it doesn't matter what the character does.

The paradox is that I don't believe in the difference between "touching the flame hurts" and "why don't you touch the flame?" When I don't believe that "touching a flame hurts", it doesn't mean that I have to touch a flame.

In the same way, I don't think that "touching the flame will hurt" as a way to avoid touching the flame myself. After I killed, the source of my behavior was definitely not the distortion in my head, but the flow of life.

Well, when the flow of life requires me to get hurt, or when I need to do something, I don't turn it down because of a twist in my head. Just like when a movie needs a villain to kill someone, or a supporting character is injured, the villain will not say that he wants to be a good person and refuse to kill, and the supporting character will not say why do you want me to get hurt and refuse to get hurt.

I don't believe it, so why not touch it?

I don't believe it, so why not curse yourself and play with it?

This problem is not blocking, it won't help with the slash, it's just a twist in the mind to try to get the character back to normal.

The character is fake, so any behavior of the character will be false, and naturally from the eyes of others, it can be interpreted as a choice made by believing in something.

But in fact, after the killing, he will definitely not believe anything, and the distortion in his mind will disappear completely. Walk in the world with the truth that "that awareness is everything".

You will not be surprised by "Touching a flame and getting hurt", nor will you be surprised by "Touching a flame will not hurt". Everything is that awareness, and as for how the content of awareness is transfigured, whether it has a certain law, it is not something that needs to be cared about at all.

What's not acceptable?

That awareness is everything, so being aware of anything is reasonable. Without a distortion in the mind, these problems are not a problem at all. So, the key point is still the distortion in the mind.

It's because I believe in distortions in my head, and when things are distorted beyond my head, I feel unbearable and incomprehensible. Either it comes down to new scientific research, or it comes down to illogical nonsense.

But what could be more efficient than this kind of judgment that is still distorted in the mind?

Obviously, the question is imagining how a person behaves after a killing, and how a person who doesn't believe in anything survives. This is indeed a contradiction, and regardless of the character's behavior, it can be interpreted as believing something.

Then, to solve this contradiction, the only way to see it is to see it for yourself. Right, what better solution could there be?

Moreover, the issue didn't hurt the character at all, and it didn't cause any damage to the twist in the character's head. Even, I didn't see what bullshit the character of Yuan Changwen still believes in now.

It looks like it's stuck, but it's just a waste problem. It's like you'll be stuck in the origin of the universe, but how the universe came into being seems to help move towards reality, but in reality it's just a matter of waste.

That awareness is everything, and everything else is. And I, trying to find reasonable logic and perfect laws in the? Isn't this the king of?

How many problems are there in the world, how many of them are right questions, how many are waste problems?

I'm not done yet, so there's bound to be a problem standing in my way. And this problem, not that touching the flame will hurt, but it is another problem that I haven't seen yet.