The cheerleaders in Huai'an Fuzhong couldn't help but cheer when they saw that they were so angry that they didn't want to be instigated. The group of relatives and friends and cheerleaders at Shanyang High School are all bad: Please, we are here to cheer you on, not to see you being abused!

But everyone on the stage, whether it was the contestants or the judges, looked immovable, for no other reason, this kind of scene has been seen too much, and it has long been strange.

To be honest, the level of high school students is there, and most of the time it's not better than the strongest, but worse than whom. In the provincial level selection competition, it is not uncommon for the whole team to die in the first ten minutes, and it is already a strong team to be able to stand on the stage and speak normally, if you can also express your own views fluently, it is definitely the appearance of the champion!

Like the mutual attack and debate just now, both sides are trying to find arguments in the pile of old papers that have lasted for two or three thousand years and tens of thousands, and the more remote they are, the more knowledgeable they are, and the more they can impress the judges. In the end, the other party doesn't know what you're talking about. I can't understand it, so how can I start talking about rebuttals? The Shanyang High School team will push four, five, or six when they encounter problems like this, which is very common in the game.

The performance time of the Huai'an Fu squadron is over, and now the initiative is transferred to the Shanyang High School team.

The third debate Yuan Baoshan took a deep breath and said silently in his heart: Next, it's time for us to take action! If there is a mistake, we must admit it, and if we are beaten, we must stand upright, and the opponent's defense friend, have you stood up straight? And the audience, are your knees and slaps ready?

He first pointed to Jiang Shuiyuan: "The other party argued, according to statistics, although the "Book of Han" recorded the history of the Western Han Dynasty in 210 years, but the period from the death of the Qin Dynasty to the Han Dynasty and the Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty occupied 73 volumes, reaching more than 70% of the whole book, the reason is that this part is exactly the content recorded in the "Historical Records"; and among these 73 volumes, 61 volumes completely copied the original text of the "Historical Records", accounting for more than 60% of the entire "Book of Han", and Ban Gu and his son only made slight deletions and additions. Isn't that enough to prove that horses are superior to class?"

Jiang Shuiyuan replied in a good time: "First of all, the reason why the Book of Han devotes more than seventy percent of the length to record the history of the period from the fall of the Qin Dynasty to the period of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty is because of the more than 90 years of treacherous and heroic heroes. In fact, although the "Historical Records" is a general history of 3,000 years from the period of the Yellow Emperor to the beginning of the fourth year of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, there are also 74 records of the history of more than 90 years from the fall of the Qin Dynasty to the period of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, accounting for more than half of the length of the book. So your argument doesn't prove anything.

Secondly, Bangu and his son did not completely copy the original text of the "Historical Records". Wang Yun, a famous scholar of the Qing Dynasty, pointed out in his "School of Historical Records" that the "Book of Han" divided, combined, deleted, and supplemented the "Historical Records" on the basis of inheritance. How easy is it to be able to separate, combine, delete, and supplement such a huge work as "Records of the Historians"! Just imagine, if you ask your Excellency to revise the "Records of the Historians" and make a new book, what will be the result? Can the revised new book be called a millennium on a par with the "Records of the Historians"?

"Legend has it that Wang Erlie of the Qing Dynasty once wrote such a limerick poem: 'The articles in the world count the three rivers, and the articles of the three rivers count my hometown.'" The articles in my hometown count my brother, and I change the articles for my brother. It can be seen that being able to revise articles for others is one of the manifestations of being better than others. Ban Gu's father and son were able to separate and delete the "Historical Records", and the revised "Book of Han" could win rave reviews from all over the world, which is enough to prove that Ban is superior to Ma. I wonder what the opponent's defense friend thinks?"

"Good!"

"Nice rebuttal!"

As soon as Jiang Shuiyuan's voice fell, the audience in the audience even applauded at a sky-high price, and the posture of the supporters was not lost to the live show of the famous Peking Opera actors, and Huang Dongpei's brows jumped when he heard it. Yuan Baoshan looked as usual, and was not affected in the slightest, because he had already heard of Jiang's name, if he was easily asked by himself, then he would be too watery, right? Fortunately, he had a more powerful real hammer.

Yuan Baoshan looked at Gao He: "The other party's second argument, just now you mentioned that 'Yi Ma kills dogs in the road', although it is streamlined, but after all, it is not as good as 'there are horses in the streets, and the lying dogs are killed', 'There are dogs lying in the thoroughfares, and the hooves of the horses are killed'." Liu Xian, a famous scholar of the Northern and Southern Dynasties, clearly pointed out in "Wenxin Carving the Dragon" that "the text is capable of distinguishing cleanliness, not being complicated and skillful", and Zhu Xi also thought that "the Taishi Gongshu is sparse and cool, and the Bangu book is dense". What do you think about that?"

After hearing this, Jiang Shuiyuan immediately wrote the word "yes" on the slip of paper and pushed it in front of Gao He.

Gao He glanced at the note, nodded slightly towards the source of the river, then stood up and said loudly: "I have three opinions. First, I think that the reason why 'a horse kills a dog in the road' is not as good as 'a horse escapes in the street and the dog is killed by the dog', and 'a dog lies in the thoroughfare and kills the horse's hooves' is that in view of the fact that the historical books pursue rich historical materials and accurate descriptions, it does not mean that the former is inferior to the latter in all aspects. Please don't misinterpret what I mean!

"Second, 'the text is capable of distinguishing cleanliness, not being complicated and skillful, and the matter is beautiful with the clear core, not the deep and hidden as the strange', this sentence comes from Liu Xian's "Wenxin Carving Dragon" in the "Discussion of the Right", and the views put forward are mainly aimed at the style of 'discussion of the right'. 'Zhou's conspiracy is said to be a discussion', and 'those who take countermeasures should respond to the edict and Chen Zhengye' are two genres that are completely unrelated to the history books we are discussing. The opponent's defense friend randomly clicked on the mandarin duck score, but I am afraid that it is not appropriate, right?

"Third, the opponent's defense friend quoted Zhu Xi's point of view, and our third debate has just answered in the words of Wang Ruoxu, a scholar of the Jin Dynasty, that is, 'moving like a simple but real complex, solid like a complex but really simple', needless to say.

"The above three points, I hope the opponent's defense friend is satisfied!"

Yuan Baoshan couldn't help but want to burst into foul language: I hope I am satisfied? If you really want to make me satisfied, you should be as silent as a chicken. You talk endlessly, you say everything that should be said and what you shouldn't say, and I'm still satisfied with a fart!

Jiang Shuiyuan's heart moved.

For a long time, I will consciously or unconsciously act as a mentor and referee in various activities in the Chinese Studies Lecture Club, and I hope that everyone can do it according to their own intentions. Now that you think about it, everyone is actually a living, jumping, and thinking individual, not someone's natural retinue or puppet, so why should you follow your ideas?

Even if you were right in the past, can you guarantee that you will be right in the future?

Take 10,000 steps back and say, even if you can be consistently correct, can you stay in Huai'an Fu China Studies and Talks Club for the rest of your life? Without you, would the Huai'an China Studies and Talks Club fall apart?

This is not the case. It can be seen from Gao He's performance just now that everyone will do better than you think, and their boundless kindness and worries are just wishful thinking. Moreover, the difficulty of Chinese culture depends on the wisdom of the group after all, and the idea of conquering the world by oneself will only harm others and oneself.

Thinking of this, Jiang Shui smiled from the ground, and then secretly gave Gao He a thumbs up: "Well said!"

"Thank you!" was acknowledged by the president, and Takatsuru was even happier.

The depressed is the Shanyang High School team: they are also attacking each other, why can they kill the Quartet when they reach each other's hands, but they are hit head-on when it is their turn? This is not scientific!

Yuan Baoshan took a deep breath again, and pinned all his hopes on Qian Zhongming: "The other party argues four times, just now you mentioned that during the period from the Han Dynasty to the Sui and Tang Dynasties, the mainstream view was to respect the class and the horse, and to emphasize the "Han" and the "History". According to historical records, Zhang Fu of the Western Jin Dynasty clearly pointed out in his book "On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Famous Scholars" that it is better to move than to move three also. What do you think about this?"

"What do I think? Obviously, Zhang Fu belongs to the non-mainstream!" The free man Qian Zhongming's frivolous answer caused the audience to laugh.

But he didn't sit down after answering, and waited for the laughter to stop before continuing: "Saying that Zhang Fu is non-mainstream is not that I am unreasonable and sensational, but that this is the case. The opponent's defense friend mentioned Zhang Fu's "Theory of the Superiority and Disadvantages of Famous Men" about the superiority of horses over classes, and he must know that there is a sentence in the front: 'The world talks about the advantages and disadvantages of Sima Qian and Ban Gucai, and most of them win with solidity, and the rest think they lose'?

Hang as high as Haman?

Not only was the audience in an uproar, but Yuan Baoshan also looked at his teammates blankly: There is such a sentence in front?