It can be seen that the reason for the above example is that the man in the above example overcame his compulsion through analysis and tried to accept his fatherhood, but then contracted depression; The reason is that he went to the other extreme - completely abandoning motherhood and embracing fatherhood. Pen & Fun & Pavilion www.biquge.info

That is, he subconsciously went from being too dependent on his mother to completely abandoning this dependence and favoring fatherhood.

Sigmund Freud said: Human anxiety and depression come from the moment when the mother is separated from the baby.

This shows that the facts and his theories corroborate each other.

Then there is another question: since there is a man in the previous example, he originally loved a girl very much, but later because of the failure of the pursuit, he became very violent in his imagination, and hurt the girl to gain the attention of others, introspection, and satisfy his love needs in a roundabout way.

Isn't this an extreme of moving from motherhood to fatherhood?

This example can be explained by "regressive satisfaction".

But is it necessary to analyze so much later? Isn't it still back to "regressive satisfaction"?

If there is such a doubt, it is also reasonable.

But there is a certain certainty that the man's turn to violence is unconscious, passive.

The latter example is proactive.

What's the difference?

It's hard to see the difference if you don't tell the difference. It can even cause confusion.

But at the same time, it only needs to be a little more careful, and it is not difficult to find that the man in the latter example took the initiative to persuade himself to accept the male fierceness after psychological analysis. It's clearer than before.

Because the precedent shifts from kindness to violence, it is passive and unconscious; Analyzed and reverted to active, conscious.

It is like restoring a moment that is extremely fast and difficult to capture to a slow state, slow motion, so as to restore the formation process of the disease more clearly, and prevent the further development of the disease in time.

It can be said that psychoanalysis has analyzed all the problems clearly, so that there is no reason why he should not regain male masculinity.

However, the complexity of the problem is much more than ordinary people and psychologists would expect.

It is evident that the personality has returned from being overly dependent on the mother to a fatherly personality, so that the personality can take advantage of it.

However, in practice, patients are always very prone to go to the other extreme, from over-dependence and defense of the mother's status to excessive favoring of the father's strength. As a result, his dependence on his mother collapsed, and he lost even the means of proving and maintaining it. Thus causing depression.

It can be said that after a deep psychological analysis, there is no essential difference between it and before psychological analysis; The only value is to reduce the pathological process before illness to slow motion in order to effectively intervene.

In layman's terms, before his illness, he could no longer fully believe in his mother's dependence, and could only constantly maintain and prove his mother's status, fiercely fight against the fatherhood that threatened his mother's position, and form a compulsive personality.

Later, after he transferred his mother's feelings to other girls, he was repeatedly hit by lovelornness, and he didn't even have the conditions to fight against his father, because the girls didn't love him and didn't need him to defend it.

Therefore, he irrepressibly turned his personality completely to the violence of fatherhood, so as to seek the girl's self-blame and self-reflection. Roundabout to satisfy his thirst for love.

After a deep psychological analysis, he understood the mechanism of his illness, believing that it was caused by over-asserting his mother's status and forgetting his male nature.

If he must gain the masculinity of a man, he will not have to work hard and fight so much to maintain his motherhood, and he will not form a compulsion.

So, he deliberately embraced the fierceness of men. In this way, we can get rid of the compulsion caused by strong resistance.

Because after the previous analysis, he understood that compulsion and depression are symbiotic. When the compulsion is gone, there is no depression.

Because the personality has been restored to balance.

However, in actual experience, it is inevitable that he will go to extremes again because of the experience of regression and satisfaction in the past.

He will think that in order to accept the fierceness of men, it is necessary to deliberately detach, deny, and reject maternal dependence.

Because he did it according to the theory of a psychiatrist.

But the essence is still a kind of regressive satisfaction.

The extremely subtle subconscious seems to say, "Look, I'm going to regain male masculinity, this is what the psychiatrist taught me." If it fails, it's also his fault. In this way, he demanded the dependence of a psychiatrist.

Because the psychiatrist had long since become a substitute for his mother's dependence. The girl he loved was also a substitute for his mother's dependence.

This is the same sentence as in the precedent: "You see, I went from good to sinful because the girl taught me because she liked the bad guy." If I'm guilty, it's all her fault. ”

In this way, the girl is asked to introspect and gain her love.

It's the same thing, but without a deep and detailed analysis, you can't find it at all.

I would only be puzzled by the fact that psychoanalysis is so in-depth, but the effect is similar to that of no analysis.

It can be seen that there is no essential difference between before and after analysis, both go to extremes, and when maternal dependence disappears, he will completely favor paternity.

The only difference is that the former is an unquenchable impulse that unconsciously goes to the extreme of fatherhood, while the latter is intentional and controllable.

It's like reverting an elusive fast motion to slow motion, which doesn't solve the problem, but only provides great convenience for solving the problem.

It can also be seen that that extreme personality deviation is so deep-rooted. The memory of the pain was so deep that he was so stubbornly persistent in his extreme approach that he could not maintain his balance.

Deep psychoanalysis can only slow down this deviation, so that the unintentional becomes intentional, and it does not stop it.

But objectively speaking, this is a great step forward.

Because psychoanalysis transforms unconscious, uncontrollable, and unpredictable diseases into conscious and controllable, allowing patients to take the initiative.

This is similar to a process of "floating" from unconsciousness to conscious, which is later referred to as "natural growth".

The devastation of his illness is gone, and he has at least regained a part of himself and regained his familiarity with reality.