This challenge is completely antithetical to psychological problems. Pen, fun, and www.biquge.info

Naturally, you should be able to think of physiological problems.

Why?

If it is said that a person is made up of spirit and body, there should be no doubt about it.

Through in-depth psychological analysis, patients are convinced that their psychology is completely free of problems and hidden dangers.

Therefore, no amount of psychological suggestion can hardly affect him.

However, there is a hint that immunity does not seem to have been formed for him, and that is that psychological problems have a physiological basis.

It can be said that if this problem is not solved, all psychological analysis is almost in vain.

This kind of suggestion is common in scientists or physiologists, or in popular science books......

Through the study of the brain, they came to the conclusion that psychology should be strictly physiological; Accustomed to reducing psychological problems to: biochemical reactions, genetic problems...... Rigorous scientific propositions.

Therefore, even Freud, a psychologist who advocated pure psychotherapy, was once disparaged as a "charlatan".

Modern medicine has also strongly demonstrated that many drugs can indeed have an "immediate" effect.

Unfortunately, there are very few examples of mental illness being cured entirely by drugs alone.

What's more, there is a deep-seated prejudice against medication for mental illness versus medication for physical illness.

Therefore, the scientific community cannot claim that the effect of drugs is great, otherwise it will contradict this bias.

However, these arguments for psychology do not make much sense.

Because the equation, molecular structure, composition, and content of biochemical reactions respected by the scientific community...... It is indeed irrefutable persuasive; Much more concrete than abstract psychoanalysis.

Psychologists may be dwarfed by science.

Psychiatric patients, in particular, are more likely to have a strong faith in scientific data; And the psychological analysis pales in comparison.

But, just keep your patience; There is still a little hope left for psychology, a little deeper; You may be surprised to find that mental illness has nothing to do with the exact scientific data and structures, and is parallel to each other.

The reasons are: excessive admiration and compromise of scientists by psychological patients, and excessive inferiority of their own qualifications; As a result, you can't get out of the spell like "genes are everything".

Fatalistic belief that one's mental illness is a fixed one that cannot be changed.

It's like a student who tries to improve his grades in various ways, but it doesn't work, and he is extremely confused.

Naturally, one thinks of the methods he employs or his own intelligence.

What's wrong? Is the method not suitable? Or is it not of high intelligence?

But almost no one, including himself, thought about the question of "do I want to study?"

If you don't want to read in the first place, the discussion of methods becomes meaningless.

There was once a student who somehow felt pessimistic before an important exam - I would definitely fail the exam.

The more prepared and assured you are, the stronger this doubt becomes.

In the eyes of ordinary people, this kind of pessimism is unnecessary and unreasonable, and it is the most typical manifestation of unconfidence.

But from a deep psychological point of view, this psychology is very reasonable.

It was his subconscious that was "rebelling" against the exam - why did he have to cater to the evaluation of the teacher and others and get a good grade?

From the later analysis, the answer was indeed found - in the distant past, in a chance and unexpected incident, he had a subtle compromise with the teacher, which led to a series of complex mental illnesses later.

The doubts about the exam are only restoring the healthy, uncompromising self that was there at that time.

I'm almost sure that as long as it's something that the ego really stands for, rather than a product of compromise, it's going to be confident and successful.

But in real life, too many people think that they will fail in other areas because of a few major setbacks, leading to pessimism and despair.

This is because of the "fusion of personalities" - the fusion of the personality of the person and the person to whom he has compromised, which will be detailed in the preceding and subsequent paragraphs.

If you fail to pursue a goal that suits him, it may lead to the failure of your own ideals and creativity.

So, don't underestimate the small successes that come naturally and from the heart in life – that's the true expression of yourself.

Connecting these small successes together is far more meaningful and valuable than a few big successes that you get by luck to cater to others......

For example, during World War II, someone once advised US President Roosevelt that if he did not produce nuclear bombs, just as Napoleon did not believe that steel ships could float on the sea, he missed out on victory planes.

Roosevelt said, "But the president of the United States of America did not want to be Napoleon." ”

It can be seen whether a person maintains himself or not as follows:

No matter how great the scientific research of ships and nuclear bombs is.

But if Roosevelt's ego was not concerned with this, the science would be meaningless to him.

Someone once questioned: "Just because you don't pay attention doesn't mean that these sciences don't exist." ”

"But did I say I was going to deny it? It's just not about paying attention. Just like whether a person's body is healthy or not, does it have to be premised on whether he has studied medicine or not? ”

Since a person aspires to regain mental health, it can be determined that there is no problem with his congenital condition.

This instinctive intuition makes more sense than genetics.

This requires a complex deconstruction process, which will be clarified later.

At that time, everyone will be surprised to find that fear is physically defective, but it is the result of excessive compromise with the science teacher.

In this way, psychological problems are still psychological problems, and are not completely reduced to mechanical "biochemical reactions"; This is still the psychological problem of excessive worship of chance, as mentioned earlier.

From this, it can be seen that the final problem returns to "idols".

Knowing this, patients will naturally not compromise too much with "idols", and will not be hinted at by them, fearing that their psychological illness is determined by strict physiological defects and cannot be changed.

However, patients are generally biased in subtle ways.

They always forget, what to do if they do not compromise with the "idols"?

They often choose the other extreme - abandoning "idols".

But this will cause them to lose the motivation to love in their hearts, lose the source of happiness, and thus become the basis of depression.

It's like when they first suffer from mental illness, they think that the physiologist is so powerless.

In the past, minor physical ailments could be successfully cured, but now that I have encountered mental illness, there seems to be no hope anymore.

It can be seen that the role of "idols" is so important!