Chen Dingtian never thinks that what form of government is adopted, but whether he thinks that the public world and the family are the world, in fact, this kind of society is not democracy or real public ownership. This does not really depend on what form of government is adopted. Pen? Interesting? Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 info Chen Dingtian believes that what social concept should be adopted and what governing concept should be adopted, if it is for the benefit of a family and a surname to govern, then this is actually no different from the monarchy. For example, in later China, a neighboring country was nominally a society. ism, but everyone knows what it is, although it is nominally a republic, but this is more monarchy than the monarchy, and even greater power than the vast majority of monarchs. And their governing philosophy is actually to maintain the power of a very small number of people, or even a certain family, from generation to generation, not for the benefit of the public.

As for British capitalism, although it allows people to retain the existence of the king, it does not govern for the benefit of the king's family and surname, but for the benefit of the capitalists. Of course, starting from one family and one surname to one class, this group has expanded a lot, although not really for all citizens, but at least it has improved a lot. So although they still have kings, it does not mean that they are absolute monarchies, because their entire society has changed its governing philosophy. So to say that Britain is a monarchy. system, in fact, Chen Dingtian does not agree with this.

In fact, if we want to avoid the well-being of the real people, we need to change not only a so-called system, nor do we need to change the way leaders are produced, but we need to change the governing philosophy of the whole world. The monarchy does not absolutely represent autocracy, and even if it is a concession system, if it is ruled for its own selfish interests, it is not necessarily inferior to the progressive and enlightened monarchy, that is, the monarchy of the British. What needs to be changed is the concept of governance, not simply changing the system. Chen Dingtian said.

Fu Shanxiang and Li Fengbao began to think, but at this time, a voice suddenly came.

"Mr. Chen, if according to what you said, even if the Manchu court is overthrown and the Han court is re-established, then if you don't change the concept of governance, you are still the kind of person who governs for the benefit of one family and one surname, will you still follow the old path of the Manchu Tartars sooner or later?" Mo Qing, who was dressed in black, walked in and asked.

Chen Dingtian was speechless and said, "Miss Moqing, can't you knock on the door?" ”

"It's okay, I saw that you had a good conversation just now, so I can't bear to disturb you. I opened the door myself, and I came in to listen to it, but I didn't expect you to say this, so I couldn't help but start asking. Mo Qing said.

Chen Dingtian scolded in his heart: "What kind of broken lock is this, I can't even stop a woman!" ”

In fact, Chen Dingtian wronged those locksmiths, Mo Qing is a professional who was born in a ringing horse, and it is very easy to pick a lock, so ordinary locksmiths will design these things?

However, Mo Qing actually heard this just now, and he also had some feelings in his heart. That is what Chen Dingtian said made her think of some other problems, originally Mo Qing thought that as long as the Manchu Tartars were expelled, as long as the Manchu Tartars could be expelled, then the Chinese people would be able to have a happy life, and then the life would be naturally happy. But Chen Dingtian's words made Mo Qing think more, as if it was not so simple to make the people happy! Mo Qing is different from ordinary thieves, she has been by Zhu Yunqing's side for nine years, so she naturally has a lot of knowledge, not the kind of rebellion for her own ambitions, but hopes to overthrow the Qing Dynasty and make the people live a better life.

But now Chen Dingtian said that if the Qing Dynasty is overthrown, but if this ruling concept cannot be changed, then the people will actually suffer in the end.

"Miss Moqing, it's actually very simple, because if you still follow the kind of regime that fought for the interests of one family and one family in the past, then there will definitely be many problems when you sit on the throne and become an emperor like this. In order to protect his own interests, he does not hesitate to work against the interests of the people, so how can we solve it? He regarded the world as his private property and all the people in the world as his slaves, so he was not deliberately causing harm to the people. Maybe one or two emperors would do better, but could he guarantee that every one of his descendants would be as good as he was? He can't guarantee, and even I can't guarantee whether those emperors are really for the good of the people, or to keep their own country, so they deliberately do better. If it is for the continuation of his family's country to strive to let the people live a good life, then it is not really for the people, and serving the people is only a means, not an end. ”

"If Aimin is just a 'means' to protect his family's country, then it is actually no different from other emperors, even if it is no different from the means of tyrants to protect the interests of the family and the throne. Therefore, I believe that only by taking the concept of governing for the sake of the people of the world as the purpose can we truly let the people live a good life. Otherwise, even if there are one or two Ming monarchs, then he just regards Aimin as a 'means' to protect his family's country, not the real goal, it is actually the same, essentially no different from those tyrants who protect the interests of their own family. ”

"What we need to change is the governing philosophy of the whole society, not just changing the bureaucratic system. Otherwise, even if they reluctantly implement the Zen concession system, the purpose of their governance is not to love the people, but to protect the interests of a very small number of people, and the very few people also regard the country as their own private wealth, so this is actually no different from the monarchy in essence. ”

"The true public world is an idea of governing for the sake of safeguarding the interests of the general public, not a simple political bureaucracy."

Fu Shanxiang was still continuing to record, and several people next to him were thinking about this matter. Even a few other Europeans were listening, including Bismarck and James Bond, but they didn't say anything. Of course, in fact, qualification is also related to the current situation in Europe, especially President Napoleon has always hoped to become Napoleon's emperor, as for Britain has now implemented a constitutional monarchy, as Chen Dingtian said, the current British government exists to protect the interests of capitalists, and has not spread to safeguard overall interests. However, Venix didn't say anything, but he also recorded it on the side, this is actually one of Chen Dingtian's "books", and according to domestic requirements, this is to be sent back to China to be shown to those officials.

Bismarck and the others are also following the record, but their purpose is only to show it to domestic officials, not to prepare for future ideological reform like Fu Shanxiang.

Including Li Fengbao, a scholar in the Qing Dynasty, also began to think, if he worked hard for the sake of a family with one surname, even if he was a Ming monarch, but so what? Even if he is a Ming Jun, he is only a means to protect his family's country, not a real Ming Jun for the benefit of the people, is such a Ming Jun a real good emperor? In fact, in other words, he is essentially the same as those tyrants, their purpose is actually just to protect their family's country, but the means adopted are different, one is to benefit the people, and the other is to choose to suppress through violence.

However, people in the past looked forward to Mingjun, but in fact, they just regarded Mingjun's means as an end, and Mingjun's welfare for the people was just a means, not his goal. If you want the real people to be safe for a long time, then you still have to take the welfare of the people as an "end", not a "means". The means are only a "means", that is not the real end, if other means can be achieved for this end, then the emperor as a ruler does not mind changing the "means", and does not necessarily use this means of "seeking the welfare of the people" as the purpose of maintaining his rule.

What Chen Dingtian said today has begun to subvert the ideas of these feudal scholars in the past. In the past, the ideas of feudal scholars were actually those who thought that they should assist the Ming Emperor and persuade the emperor to seek benefits for the people. However, what Chen Dingtian said now has far subverted the ideas of feudal scholars.

However, Li Fengbao is not actually a pure Confucian scholar, he is better at mathematics, his Confucian knowledge is not profound, and he even failed to pass the Xiucai exam twice. This Li Fengbao is better at mathematics, geography, surveying and mapping and other scientific courses, so although Li Fengbao has a subversive statement about Chen Dingtian, he is not the kind of person who dies in reading, he did not get up and make a fuss on the spot, but they all thought about it seriously.

According to what Chen Dingtian said, in the past, whether those emperors were the so-called Ming Jun, benevolent and virtuous monarchs, or those faint monarchs and tyrants, in fact, they were just "raccoon dogs". Because whether they are "Ming", "Ren", "Xian", or brutal, etc., they are actually a "means" to maintain his family's rule, and since they are just "means", there is actually no difference between noble and inferior.

It cannot be said that killing with poison is better than killing with a sword, because killing people by any means is essentially murder, and it will not become a noble and a despicable one just because the means are used. So if according to Chen Dingtian's statement, those emperors are all for the sake of maintaining the world of one family and one surname, then in fact, no matter what they do, whether they do it well or poorly, it is just a "means", not really for the good of the people. This can also be used to take advantage of the situation, why some emperors are benevolent and righteous, and some emperors are cruel, because they are actually only for the benefit of their own family in the future, not really for the good of the people.

Wickus, an Englishman, was the first to say: "This Chinese Chen has a point, it is true!" ”

But James Bond and Bismarck next to him didn't let go of a fart, where did they dare to answer. Because Wickix was British, England had already achieved the Glorious Revolution, and it was almost "fashionable" to evaluate and criticize the king. But although France is now a presidential system, as an agent of the intelligence organization next to French President Napoleon, James Bond understands Napoleon's thoughts very well, isn't it actually to protect the interests of Napoleon's family? So if James Bond dares to echo now, then maybe after a while, this James Bond will not know that he died in the Huangpu River. Because here I am afraid that Bismarck and Venix will not mind going to tell President Napoleon and kill him, James Bond.

In the same way, Bismarck is the same, in Prussia, a monarchy, the monarch still has very great power, so of course Bismarck does not dare to talk nonsense, if the two guys around him go to sue Wilhelm through other channels, then he will die without a place to be buried. Although they all knew that most of what Chen Dingtian said was right, they didn't dare to let go of a fart, but the Englishman Veneus, who achieved a constitutional monarchy, was bolder and dared to echo Chen Dingtian's words.

But no matter what, this Bismarck and that James Bond are also recording this related content, this is going back to show their boss, of course, they don't dare to neglect it. As for Chen Dingtian, he still continues to explain his so-called public ownership statement with several people.

Even Chen Dingtian belittled the so-called Ming monarchs and all kinds of good emperors in ancient times to worthless, because he thought that the so-called good emperor was just a "good" emperor in order to maintain the stability of his family. But if one day he finds that being a "good emperor" cannot maintain the stability of the country, no one will mind tearing his face and being a "tyrant". Because no matter how good a king is, he can't change his identity as a feudal king in essence. He still has to be responsible for his family, so that their so-called love for the people is just a "means", as a means, no matter what the means are, it is only a means, and it can never become an end. Only when love for the people is regarded as the "goal" can it truly be a good government. Otherwise, even if there is an occasional emperor who regards loving the people as a "means", he will also encounter more emperors who use other means to protect his country.

"Therefore, any so-called Mingjun is unreliable. I think that whether it is a Han or a Manchu, or even someone else, as long as he still regards the love of the people as a means, as long as the purpose of his ruling is still for the interests of a very small number of people, and he still regards the country as the private property of himself and his family, then it is actually no different from the monarch in essence, and he is not even really loving the people, his love for the people is just a means. Chen Dingtian said.