readx; ").src="//.js?cdnversion="+.gethours; Next

Temple of Stone. Pen ~ fun ~ pavilion www.biquge.info

There are differences in the concepts between people and people......

Because of this, what some people take for granted may seem completely unacceptable to others......

Between gains and losses, many times it is often difficult to weigh right and wrong in a simple way!

It's like a joke question......

Different people have completely different perceptions and understandings of jokes!

In the eyes of some people, a joke is always a joke, and no matter how much trouble the joke itself causes to others, as long as the starting point is a joke, then it should be forgiven......

If someone can't understand, then they will be considered a person who can't afford to make jokes, and they will be considered cautious......

However, in reality, not everyone thinks like this, the vast majority of people are actually reluctant to accept the so-called jokes with obvious malice, jokes are themselves measured, and jokes that exceed a certain scale are no longer so-called jokes, but a hostile and malicious behavior!

Many people obviously lack emotional intelligence, so it is often difficult to correctly distinguish the difference between so-called jokes and malice, and it is difficult for such people to have real friends......

Of course, there are also some people who like to base their happiness on the pain of others, and when they see that they are unhappy, they will feel happy and satisfied, and if others show disgust with their behavior, they will say that the other party is cautious and the other party is a person who can't make jokes......

However, in fact, such people themselves often belong to the type that can't afford to make jokes, they can accept that they use malicious ways to make jokes about others, but it is often difficult to accept other people to make their own jokes with malice!

Many people have heard the principle of not doing unto others as you would have them do unto you, but it is often difficult for many people to do so!

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

The scale of law is fixed, but the scale of humanity is often difficult to be constant!

Different countries, different regions, different customs, and different laws of humanity......

In some places, heinous acts may be taken for granted in others......

For example, in some backward tribes, the custom of eating the brains of dead relatives is still retained, or the auction is openly carried out at a specific time and in a specific area, and so on......

These customs, which may seem unbelievable or even completely unacceptable in civilized society, seem so common to the locals that even those who don't like them don't show much disgust with them......

Of course, the more civilized the country and the more civilized the region, the higher the standard of humanity!

The more advanced the scientific and technological civilization, the higher the standards of people's humanitarian order will be formulated, and the more humanitarian rules people will need to abide by......

The process from barbarism to civilization is actually a kind of change that occurs after the abundance of materials......

In the era of scarcity of material resources, the competition for resources itself is a necessity for survival, and under this premise, all murderous plots and plundering can be said to be a matter of course, because all this is just for survival......

There is no reason to be blamed for doing things in order to survive!

However, in an era when civilization has developed to a certain height, peace and harmony have become a mainstream idea, and even if competition is still continuous, even if wars are still frequent in some regions, this does not affect the construction of humanitarian order......

With the continuous accumulation of resources, human beings will naturally become more civilized, which is a matter of course!

The so-called cangli knows etiquette enough, and that's the truth!

The so-called etiquette, in essence, is based on the abundance of materials!

Only if there is enough wealth, then there is a so-called etiquette, and if the poverty reaches a certain level, no matter how well educated a person is, he may become a beast......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

The same is true of the humane order!

Essentially, the faster a society develops, the faster the humane order will develop!

People's moral standards will continue to improve with the development of society!

The so-called material civilization and spiritual civilization themselves complement each other!

No one is willing to give up a fortune that is important to them to do good deeds, but if a person only needs to spend a very small amount of wealth to do something that is helpful to others, then I am afraid that the vast majority of people will be willing to do it!

Someone once put forward the idea that a beggar who donated all his property was, in a sense, more worthy of respect than a local tyrant who donated one-thousandth of his property, because his kindness was more worthy of admiration......

Although this concept is not correct, but in a sense, it can also be seen that from the perspective of many people, donating a wealth that is very important to themselves, and donating a wealth that is not very important to themselves, the former is more noble than the latter, and it is more valuable, there is no doubt about it!

Of course, in fact, how much good deed a person has done, and how noble they are, there is no direct relationship, simply put, people who donate more money, can always achieve better results of doing good, if the rich can do their own charity, naturally it is undoubtedly more practical than the poor donating money......

Even if the rich only spend a very small amount of their wealth on charity, as long as this wealth is properly planned, it is far more practical than the wealth donated by a hundred and a thousand beggars......

And the more abundant the material resources, the more wealth people can use freely, and the more wealth that can be used freely, it often means more resources that can be used to help others......

Under the premise of raising hands, I am afraid that many people will be indifferent when others need help.

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

It's like a porcelain incident in society!

In essence, people are not losing their morality, just because there is a theoretical risk of being blackmailed by raising an old man......

In the final analysis, it is the guidance of the law and public opinion that makes people biased towards not helping those who may blackmail themselves in terms of values......

In the final analysis, it is not that people do not have good intentions, but that it is often difficult for good intentions to be properly protected......

On the contrary, why does online crowdfunding always raise funds?

In fact, the reason is very simple......

Because for netizens, to a person who is suffering from pain and suffering, to extend a helping hand, to do their own modest efforts, itself is a matter of effort, donating a few dollars is not too little, dozens of dollars and hundreds of dollars are not too much, under such a premise, people feel that helping others will not have any negative impact on themselves, they are naturally willing to choose to be generous, after all, it is not really necessary to take out how much money to solve each other's problems, Just try to do it......

In such a situation, it is naturally easier to raise funds!

Online, no one knows who you are, and no one will have any opinion about a person because of how much money they donate......

If you donate too much, you will be praised, but even if you donate less, you will not be despised and ridiculed, and everyone's kindness can be responded to as it should be, under this premise, people are naturally willing to do good deeds!

On the contrary, in reality, many donations are often face-saving projects, and there are often horizontal comparisons between donors, who also give their love, and people who donate less money are often despised and ridiculed, obviously doing good things, but it is difficult to be recognized, it is difficult to generate satisfaction, so in the end they are often reluctant to donate money......

Just like the story of Zigong, the reason why the people of Lu were unwilling to redeem people in the end was because they were unwilling to put aside with a moral model like Zigong for people to judge...... (To be continued.) )ad_950